Integrity28 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I mean, we're splitting hairs over backups around the league.... Glennon, Hoyer... McGloin is a guy I'd rather add to the QB room over Hoyer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, Integrity28 said: I mean, we're splitting hairs over backups around the league.... Glennon, Hoyer... McGloin is a guy I'd rather add to the QB room over Hoyer. McGloin, Geno, Hoyer, McCown. They're all basically in the same category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, UnitedWhofans said: McGloin, Geno, Hoyer, McCown. They're all basically in the same category. Hot take, brah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebag Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I'd rather take McGloin over Hoyer - he has room to grow as a qb. Plus the McGroin references here would be non-stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
August Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I'd rather bring back Geno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebag Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 20 minutes ago, August said: I'd rather bring back Geno. Ok bend over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTownsell1 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 31 minutes ago, peebag said: I'd rather take McGloin over Hoyer - he has room to grow as a qb. Plus the McGroin references here would be non-stop. I'm a PSU fan, watched him play a ton. He has no room to grow as a QB. It's amazing that he has managed to become a serviceable backup QB in the NFL. His best case scenario is a Ryan Fitzpatrick type of career. With that said, Mcgloin or Hoyer, it's all the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 He has some starts but really not too many so you really don't know how well he would do if he's a starter. But it's a good option to consider. If the Jets signed a Cutler and wanted an experienced backup over Petty he could be no. 2 Qb with Hack as no. 3. It would all depend on how the Jets evaluate Petty and Hack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Clouds Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 hour ago, peebag said: I'd rather take McGloin over Hoyer - he has room to grow as a qb. Plus the McGroin references here would be non-stop. Yeah.......I just might have to pull for McGroin also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetFaninMI Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 hour ago, peebag said: I'd rather take McGloin over Hoyer - he has room to grow as a qb. Plus the McGroin references here would be non-stop. Starting with this one: I'd rather have a kick in the McGroin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetFaninMI Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 10 minutes ago, Happy Clouds said: Yeah.......I just might have to pull for McGroin also. Beaten by minutes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 hour ago, JoJoTownsell1 said: I'm a PSU fan, watched him play a ton. He has no room to grow as a QB. It's amazing that he has managed to become a serviceable backup QB in the NFL. His best case scenario is a Ryan Fitzpatrick type of career. With that said, Mcgloin or Hoyer, it's all the same. Agreed. It was amazing what O'Brien did for him, but that is all that is there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Keep sleeping on Hoyer. Matt McGloin is something like 1-6 as a starter 11/11 TD/INT and never had a 300 yard game. Hoyer had like 9 300 yard games, 44/26 TD/INT and I believe he has a winning record as a starter. Hoyer is way bigger and I think he just has more tools. Negatives on Hoyer are that he is not a franchise guy, won't go 0-16/2-14 and that playoff game he had against KC. Ouch. Postive is that he should be cheap and a value for the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 23 minutes ago, #27TheDominator said: Keep sleeping on Hoyer. Matt McGloin is something like 1-6 as a starter 11/11 TD/INT and never had a 300 yard game. Hoyer had like 9 300 yard games, 44/26 TD/INT and I believe he has a winning record as a starter. Hoyer is way bigger and I think he just has more tools. Negatives on Hoyer are that he is not a franchise guy, won't go 0-16/2-14 and that playoff game he had against KC. Ouch. Postive is that he should be cheap and a value for the money. I'd welcome him as a backup. The point of the thread was more of an esoteric commentary on arguing trash vs. trash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: I'd welcome him as a backup. The point of the thread was more of an esoteric commentary on arguing trash vs. trash. We are going to have trash. Why shouldn't we argue about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 No glennon pls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: I'd welcome him as a backup. The point of the thread was more of an esoteric commentary on arguing trash vs. trash. Well that isn't happening Hoyer to the 9ers on a multi year deal. This other guy may be looked at along with every other QB that is left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 8, 2017 Author Share Posted March 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, #27TheDominator said: We are going to have trash. Why shouldn't we argue about it? No rebuttal. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Straw Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Welcome back, Geno! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Am I crazy but didnt we just use two draft picks in back to back years on Quarterbacks? Either play the kids you drafted or quit. I dont get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggin94it Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I'd be very happy, since it would lock in the tank for Darnold/Rosen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 4 hours ago, Integrity28 said: I mean, we're splitting hairs over backups around the league.... Glennon, Hoyer... McGloin is a guy I'd rather add to the QB room over Hoyer. Passing not so bad. not much of a body of work. Share & more Modify & Share Table Embed this Table Get table as CSV (for Excel) Copy Link to Table to Clipboard About Sharing Tools Glossary Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate QBR Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% 4QC GWD AV 2013 24 OAK qb 14 7 6 1-5-0 118 211 55.9 1547 8 3.8 8 3.8 52 7.3 6.4 13.1 221.0 76.1 50.2 6 53 6.88 5.96 2.8 4 2014 25 OAK 14 1 0 12 19 63.2 129 1 5.3 2 10.5 29 6.8 3.1 10.8 129.0 61.0 26.7 1 8 6.05 2.55 5.0 0 2015 26 OAK 14 2 0 23 32 71.9 142 2 6.3 1 3.1 14 4.4 4.3 6.2 71.0 88.3 43.1 2 20 3.59 3.44 5.9 0 2016 27 OAK qb 14 4 1 0-1-0 8 15 53.3 50 0 0.0 0 0.0 19 3.3 3.3 6.3 12.5 60.4 14.5 0 0 3.33 3.33 0.0 0 Career 14 7 1-6-0 161 277 58.1 1868 11 4.0 11 4.0 52 6.7 5.8 11.6 133.4 75.3 9 81 6.25 5.29 3.1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayBen Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Matt McGloin didn't even come to my mind as a possible option. Very low ceiling, and I'm not in the mood to see Ryan Fitzpatrick 2.0 this season. However, are we that against geno? I'm very intrigued to pit him, petty, and hack against each other this preseason and allow competition to grant the position to whoever earns it. Realistically we are not a team that is contending for the Super Bowl or even the playoffs really next year, there's a lot of unproven players (which I definitely see some potential in though). Why not let the young guys compete and see what happens? Worse case scenario we end up with a high draft pick next year AKA Sam Darnold. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 8 minutes ago, BroadwayBen said: Matt McGloin didn't even come to my mind as a possible option. Very low ceiling, and I'm not in the mood to see Ryan Fitzpatrick 2.0 this season. However, are we that against geno? I'm very intrigued to pit him, petty, and hack against each other this preseason and allow competition to grant the position to whoever earns it. Realistically we are not a team that is contending for the Super Bowl or even the playoffs really next year, there's a lot of unproven players (which I definitely see some potential in though). Why not let the young guys compete and see what happens? Worse case scenario we end up with a high draft pick next year AKA Sam Darnold. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I am Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I would sign him only if he can hold on field goals. Holden McGloin jokes would be so much fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetswinbaby! Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I'd much prefer Pat McGroin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I think I listed him as an option last season if Fitz didn't re-sign. Would take him over Hoyer any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.