BigRy56 Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 2 minutes ago, Mogglez said: I can’t divulge specifics, but as it stands, I’m ok with it. I say “…as it stands….” because I’ve been told the hold up is because: a.) He needs to officially say whether or not he’s going to play this season (both the Jets and Packers feel he will, and are operating on the belief that he will.) b.) the Jets prefer to have an understanding of whether or not this will be a one and done season, or if Aaron will commit to two (or more, but I doubt it will be more) years. That’s why I believe that this is taking so long. I think he’s going to play this year and, as I said, so do both teams involved here. Regardless the cash flow and picks involved are contingent on this. Can you say if it involves anything more than draft picks from the Jets? The rumor of Jermaine Johnson being involved is not something I’d love 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogglez Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 Just now, Dcat said: does the comp include the tackle? I know early on they attempted to get both. I don’t believe that will be the case now. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post football guy Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 10, 2023 Inside the building there’s no sense of distress or worry over this like us fans. Apparently business as usual and they’re proceeding as if he’ll be there. Beyond frightening if you ask me, but it sounds like they’re prepared to wait. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogglez Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 Just now, BigRy56 said: Can you say if it involves anything more than draft picks from the Jets? The rumor of Jermaine Johnson being involved is not something I’d love I cannot. Apologies. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 9 minutes ago, Pac said: Or he's having fun trolling everyone. Still think he's in.. Would be a huge dick move to make everyone including his great friend Hackett wait till last minute just to say no. that's exactly what i would do. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 13 minutes ago, choon328 said: If traded Bahktiari would have $1.6 million cap hit for his new team. This leads me to believe he won't be included in the deal. But if he is and GB is eating $15 million then #13 for sure will be involved in the deal. How many JNers would object to # 13 for Rodgers and Bakhtiari? Many here want to use the pick on an OT anyways. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SackExchangeNYJ Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 Just now, football guy said: Inside the building there’s no sense of distress or worry over this like us fans. Apparently business as usual and they’re proceeding as if he’ll be there. Beyond frightening if you ask me, but it sounds like they’re prepared to wait. In other words, if Joe Douglas played poker against the entire Jets fan base, we would all be broke. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndianaJet Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 11 minutes ago, choon328 said: If traded Bahktiari would have $1.6 million cap hit for his new team. This leads me to believe he won't be included in the deal. But if he is and GB is eating $15 million then #13 for sure will be involved in the deal. Thoroughly confused by this tweet. OTC has Bakhtiari's contract for 2023 as: $1.2 million in base salary $600,000 per game roster bonus ( x17 games is $10.2 million) $700K workout bonus Where is this "$5.5 million of his 2023 base salary" coming from when his 2023 base salary was only $1.2 to being with? And the OTC webiste does not appear to have been updated since this new broke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndianaJet Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 Just now, Jetsfan80 said: How many JNers would object to # 13 for Rodgers and Bakhtiari? Many here want to use the pick on an OT anyways. I would object. I want nothing to do with Bakhtiari, the only dude injured more then him is Becton. I certainly wouldn't up the ante to a 1st round pick for him. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 I really believe the GB FO Morons are obsessed about getting a high draft pick because they need to show it to their fans, and they don’t mind in the alternative absorbing cap hit and cash spend to do that. They are working on buying draft picks. The way Rodgers contract works, he actually gets relatively very little cash for playing in 2025 and 2025-$15mm and $10mm, respectively. That is what is contract says if he wants to play. If I am him, that is not enough cash to do that. Let’s see if he tried to amend his contract to give him more money in total, but spread over more years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BigRy56 Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 10, 2023 2 minutes ago, Mogglez said: I cannot. Apologies. Damn alright. Looking forward to this sh*t being over so we can focus on free agency 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bla bla bla Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 5 minutes ago, IndianaJet said: Thoroughly confused by this tweet. OTC has Bakhtiari's contract for 2023 as: $1.2 million in base salary $600,000 per game roster bonus ( x17 games is $10.2 million) $700K workout bonus Where is this "$5.5 million of his 2023 base salary" coming from when his 2023 base salary was only $1.2 to being with? And the OTC webiste does not appear to have been updated since this new broke. OTC is showing the old contract, 3rd and 5th columns (base salary and roster bonus) is where the money is being pulled from for the signing bonus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said: How many JNers would object to # 13 for Rodgers and Bakhtiari? Many here want to use the pick on an OT anyways. i wouldn't be thrilled w/it. Adding an oft injured tackle isn't very appealing. but we need a qb 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mogglez Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 10, 2023 1 minute ago, BigRy56 said: Damn alright. Looking forward to this sh*t being over so we can focus on free agency Thank you for understanding. I’m on pins and needles as well, lol. Just gonna have to wait it out. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oatmeal Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 6 minutes ago, Mogglez said: I can’t divulge specifics, but as it stands, I’m ok with it. I say “…as it stands….” because I’ve been told the hold up is because: a.) He needs to officially say whether or not he’s going to play this season (both the Jets and Packers feel he will, and are operating on the belief that he will.) b.) the Jets prefer to have an understanding of whether or not this will be a one and done season, or if Aaron will commit to two (or more, but I doubt it will be more) years. That’s why I believe that this is taking so long. I think he’s going to play this year and, as I said, so do both teams involved here. Regardless the cash flow and picks involved are contingent on this. Item B. Will push a ego clown like this to retire. He’s probably like: “yeah I can do one but IDK after that…” (even though I think he would give it at least 2 shots here depending on how it went the 1st season) BUT he really just wants room to be able to do this same exact song and dance next season 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post y2k8 Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 10, 2023 34 minutes ago, SackExchangeNYJ said: He hasn't ever officially been a Jet, and the franchise already has an "Aaron Rodgers Era." The "Aaron Rodgers Era" has already lasted longer than the franchise's "Bill Belichick Era". 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bla bla bla Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 5 minutes ago, Barry McCockinner said: i wouldn't be thrilled w/it. Adding an oft injured tackle isn't very appealing. but we need a qb According to Packers fans, he was a beast the 2nd gmhave of the year when he got healthy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, oatmeal said: Item B. Will push a ego clown like this to retire. He’s probably like: “yeah I can do one but IDK after that…” (even though I think he would give it at least 2 shots here depending on how it went the 1st season) BUT he really just wants room to be able to do this same exact song and dance next season I think it's a silly request to ask him to commit to 2 years. If he's questioning whether he'll play this year how is he going to know where he's at after the grind of another NFL season. I get that both teams would ideally like to know the answer to that, but you won't get an answer. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETS SB Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 30 minutes ago, Jets4Life1979 said: No, he's gonna give Joe Dougals a middle finger and say hes retiring and the entire jets front office look like the schmucks they are Why would pursuing Aaron Rodgers and have him turn us down to retire make the Jets front office look bad ? Isn’t the attempt to get a HOF QB here a positive move or are you just a miserable human being ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 The only way any of this is worth it is if he is giving a minimum of two years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bla bla bla Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 12 minutes ago, Mogglez said: I know early on they attempted to get both. I don’t believe that will be the case now. Do you think it's possible we put lipstick on this trade? Like besides whatever picks it costs maybe Davis and Lawson get sent over to make the trade not look quite so lopsided? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 1 minute ago, Beerfish said: The only way any of this is worth it is if he is giving a minimum of two years. it's going to all be worth it when Breece is tearing down the sideline to make it a 3 score lead in the 4th quarter of the AFCCG. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bla bla bla Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 Just now, JETS SB said: Why would pursuing Aaron Rodgers and have him turn us down to retire make the Jets front office look bad ? Isn’t the attempt to get a HOF QB here a positive move or are you just a miserable human being ? Because the media with run: "Aaron Rodgers has decided $110m is not enough to play for the Jets" "Aaron Rodgers turns down richest QB salary to avoid Jets" That's what will happen 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SackExchangeNYJ Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 Just now, bla bla bla said: Because the media with run: "Aaron Rodgers has decided $110m is not enough to play for the Jets" "Aaron Rodgers turns down richest QB salary to avoid Jets" That's what will happen This. The Jets-hating football media have already laid the foundation for how to spin it if the Jets get Rodgers, and how to spin it if they don't. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptisme Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 1 hour ago, 32EBoozer said: Interesting. I wonder if GB going full rebuild or partial? Maybe extra year will be tied to it to match up with Rodgers. Both leave together. Not full rebuild. Bak, Jones, Smith etc would have been gone. They look to be switching to Love and somewhat maintaining around him till they get out from under Rodgers cap hit next year. Partial Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETS SB Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 1 minute ago, bla bla bla said: Because the media with run: "Aaron Rodgers has decided $110m is not enough to play for the Jets" "Aaron Rodgers turns down richest QB salary to avoid Jets" That's what will happen And that makes the Jets front office look bad for trying to get him. Gotcha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Pac Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 10, 2023 Live video of Rodgers beginning to contemplate if he'll commit to 2 years. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joejet Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 40 minutes ago, fusionCA said: and if Rodgers comes here does everyone lineup and kick you in the balls ? Yes please!! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ptisme Posted March 10, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted March 10, 2023 2 minutes ago, bla bla bla said: Because the media with run: "Aaron Rodgers has decided $110m is not enough to play for the Jets" "Aaron Rodgers turns down richest QB salary to avoid Jets" That's what will happen Ok first. Packers fan here. Second I’m very bullish on the Jets and will be rooting for them as my second favorite team if they get Rodgers. But all respect due, the Jets couldn’t look worse as a franchise over the last few decades. They will have to recover by winning playoff games, not blowing the media 4 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oatmeal Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 Not going to lie I can see Rodgers retiring before he committed 2 years 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets4Life1979 Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 8 minutes ago, JETS SB said: Why would pursuing Aaron Rodgers and have him turn us down to retire make the Jets front office look bad ? Isn’t the attempt to get a HOF QB here a positive move or are you just a miserable human being ? Cause they put all their eggs in one basket, and they had carr in the building and let him walk without making an offer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike135 Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 3 minutes ago, Joejet said: Yes please!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cbucco19 Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 27 minutes ago, Mogglez said: I can’t divulge specifics, but as it stands, I’m ok with it. I say “…as it stands….” because I’ve been told the hold up is because: a.) He needs to officially say whether or not he’s going to play this season (both the Jets and Packers feel he will, and are operating on the belief that he will.) b.) the Jets prefer to have an understanding of whether or not this will be a one and done season, or if Aaron will commit to two (or more, but I doubt it will be more) years. That’s why I believe that this is taking so long. I think he’s going to play this year and, as I said, so do both teams involved here. Regardless the cash flow and picks involved are contingent on this. Shouldn’t it all be conditional though ? He can say he is playing 2 but only plays 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SackExchangeNYJ Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 1 minute ago, Cbucco19 said: Shouldn’t it all be conditional though ? He can say he is playing 2 but only plays 1 I would think Douglas would put in protections into the deal in the event Rodgers only plays one year. Trust in Joe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lauderdale jet Posted March 10, 2023 Share Posted March 10, 2023 2 hours ago, Cbucco19 said: Shouldn’t it all be conditional though ? He can say he is playing 2 but only plays 1 exactly what i said. if he retires you dont get a 24 pick etc. easy...done 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.