afosomf Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Nobody is going to play the Ed Reed role unless his name is Ed Reed or Ronnie Lott pumps his body full of HGH. That being said, this trade is beyond ridiculous. Cutler isn't worth that much. I could see a 1st. round pick but one of the better Safeties in the league on top of that? if we get cutler we are going to have a nice bet... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 17, 2009 Author Share Posted March 17, 2009 I must say I'm very surprised by the voting so far... more than 2/3rds have voted "No". Wow. So people are we really saying that Kerry Rhodes is so unreplacable that we are going to pass up the chance on a young, strong armed Franchise Quarterback for him? Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alk Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 I must say I'm very surprised by the voting so far... more than 2/3rds have voted "No". Wow. So people are we really saying that Kerry Rhodes is so unreplacable that we are going to pass up the chance on a young, strong armed Franchise Quarterback for him? Interesting. Is Brandon Marshall included in this trade? Because he's going to look like Ryan Leaf with the cast of receivers the Jets have right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Is Brandon Marshall included in this trade? Because he's going to look like Ryan Leaf with the cast of receivers the Jets have right now. just do not run away if trade occurs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alk Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 if we get cutler we are going to have a nice bet... Not going to happen. At some point madmike seems to have broken a little bit of himself off in you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetkid94 Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Rhodes on defense is more important than cutler on offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alk Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 just do not run away if trade occurs Why would I do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Not going to happen. At some point madmike seems to have broken a little bit of himself off in you. nope just a nice wager i haven't called u okie today have I ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman88 Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Not a ****ing chance I do this trade, Cutler isn't even worth just our first rounder. I don't understand all the love for Cutler, he has a big arm but otherwise he hasn't done **** in the NFL. He has a losing record overall and don't blame that soley on the team because Jake Plummer who was nowhere near as good had the Broncos in the AFC Championship before Cutler took over. Getting Cutler would be the exact same type of move that getting Favre was last year, a sexy move that won't get us anywhere. Also Cutler would be eaten alive by the NY media and fans, he's having this much of a hissy fit over almost being traded in Denver, are you kidding me? The NFL is a business, **** happens, suck it up and play. He's a bigger primma donna than Matt Leinert and when he talks to the media he sounds stuck up. He would fail miserably here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack48 Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 rhodes can be replaced he has not played that great anyway sign rodney roid:D for a year Rhodes is definitely overrated on this board. I don't know about the rest of the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alk Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Rhodes is definitely overrated on this board. I don't know about the rest of the league. He is overrated on this board but what board doesn't overrate their own players? That being said, he is still one of the top young safeties in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Let's say Kerry Rhodes' trade value is a 1st and another conditional pick. We would be essentially giving up 3 VERY valuable draft picks (or a franchise safety and a 1st round pick) for Jay Cutler. I vote no. Rhodes value is nowhere near 1+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gang_green03 Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 That'd be very tough but I think I'd do it. Young, proven franchise QBs that haven't even entered their prime yet are hard to come by and Rhodes isn't so great to warrant passing on aquiring one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Babe Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 Rhodes value is nowhere near 1+ i dunno, tannenbaum can make any team overpay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 cutler would never make it in NY he'd go "ryan leaf" on cimini by week 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdropOFvenom Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 The goal isn't to create one hole in order to fill another. I wouldn't. I'd sooner give up an '09 First and an '10 First. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 17, 2009 Share Posted March 17, 2009 No. Rhodes is a great safety. Trading him and a first is too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 We can get a Ball-Hawk in the 2nd round. This is not a BAD idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreen Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 i voted no. i want to trade for Cutler, but i think a first round and Kerry is too steep a price. grow clemens or ratliff if thats what their asking for. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryno the Jet Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skCV2L0c6K0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skCV2L0c6K0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTsurfing Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 not only no, but hell no. I want cutler also, but he's not worth all that. I would go a first and a back-up player and 2 and 3rd next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTsurfing Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 or I would do Rhodes and a second or third this year and 2and third next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aten Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 It's one thing if you just don't want Cutler. It's something else entirely if you move from yes to no south of this price. You don't have the stomach for this conversation and would do well to get out before names start coming up that aren't a 15M hit away from even being in play. Who should we do next? Nick? Revis? I don't see how you can be serious about this and think anybody is untouchable save for reasons of financial impossibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ylekram Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 cutler is the very best qb to ever come up on the open market.i mean ever(i might be missing a few trades)3 years in the league.got at least a decade left if healthy.who else is better? manning?starting his 12th season.maybe 4 or 5 left.probably the best,but age? brady?who knows how his knee is gonna be.a full year is a long time out of football. big ben? maybe brees?already messed up his shoulder once.one more time and done.still a good qb the only other qb i can think of is the kid from san diego.rivers rivers and cutler gotta be the best 2 qb options(if you were a franchise trying to acuire a franchise qb)in the league. if cutler aint worth a mid 1st and overrated hollywood,i dont know what is. again,he has to be worth 2 1st's and a second Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 I can't believe this poll is currently 2-1 against. People are clammoring for the Jets to "do what it takes" to get Cutler, but balking at giving up Rhodes? What kind of offer do you expect Denver to accept? You gotta give a little bit if it's your dream to get a young, talented, pro bowl, 4500 yard, 25 TD QB to wear your favorite uniform. Wake up, man. Either you want him or you don't. If this deal turns your stomach, then you don't. I tend to doubt that this would be enough to get him in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Cutler does not fit to what our offense is trying to do. I voted no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJ667 Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 they also said Darrelle Revis instead of Rhodes, i still said hell no. the Jets are building a killer D. Cutler turns the ball over too much for Rex's scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreen Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 or I would do Rhodes and a second or third this year and 2and third next year. Why would you want to give up Rhodes? Not only that, but, but you'd want to give them picks, too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Rhodes on defense is more important than cutler on offense No. Just no. Come on, man. Troy Palomalu is not more important than Ben Roethlisberger. Crap, Ed Reed isn't more important than Joe Flacco! they also said Darrelle Revis instead of Rhodes, i still said hell no. the Jets are building a killer D. Cutler turns the ball over too much for Rex's scheme. I'd even give up Revis, but I'd no longer be willing to give a #1. Maybe a conditional 2010 pick that could become a #1. Revis is legitimately a special player. Rhodes can be very good, but he's not special. And 18 int's over 600 pass attempts for a second year starter on a team with a poor running game and defense is pretty damn good if you ask me - and likely only to get better. I'm a miser when it comes to trading in general, but you gotta make a serious play for a QB of this caliber. You have to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KINGDIRK Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 No, I wouldn't do it because I seriously doubt Rex Ryan would do it. He's not gutting his defense for Cutler. Explain to me who the **** is going to play the Ed Reed role in Rex's defense? "Gutting his defense"....Oh man, get a clue. Stupidity rains. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 redskins are now involved in talks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penguini 15 Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 i was joking about rodney roid Kerry can be replaced, hollywood's play has slipped and Cutler makes us a great team not just agood team who says we even have a "good" team with the offense we have. Our defense would go from "great" to "mediocre" if we lost kerry. Cutler isnt worth it if that would be the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penguini 15 Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 I'd even give up Revis, but I'd no longer be willing to give a #1. Maybe a conditional 2010 pick that could become a #1. Revis is legitimately a special player. Rhodes can be very good, but he's not special. ??????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 18, 2009 Author Share Posted March 18, 2009 redskins are now involved in talks Makes sense. I read something a couple of months ago that they might be looking to get rid of Jason Campbell and that would be ideal for them to pick up Cutler, I'm just not so sure why Josh McDaniels would want Jason Campbell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted March 18, 2009 Share Posted March 18, 2009 Makes sense. I read something a couple of months ago that they might be looking to get rid of Jason Campbell and that would be ideal for them to pick up Cutler, I'm just not so sure why Josh McDaniels would want Jason Campbell. cause joshie is an idiot..won't be shocked if bowlen swallows pride and cans the doosh before they play a game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.