Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

will the Jets keep 4 QB's going into week 1 or will Garrard or Mcelboy be dropped?


91 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

I think we might as well hang on to all 4 just incase

 

 

with this crappy team we'll need as many healthy QB's as can be

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Dunno, we'll have to take it as it goes.

 

Didn't we have 5 QB's on the roster under Mangini at some point?  Kliff Kingsbury was one of them I think.  It was a strange scenario as I recall.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Dunno, we'll have to take it as it goes.

 

Didn't we have 5 QB's on the roster under Mangini at some point?  Kliff Kingsbury was one of them I think.  It was a strange scenario as I recall.

 

i was hoping to never remember the Jets had a guy named "Kliff" on our roster at some point in my lifetime :D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Drop Garrard if you won't drop Sanchez.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

why would they drop Garrard over Sims?

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

if garrard gets hurt and is unable to play the rest of the year drop him

 

if not mcelroy and sims are prime canadites

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Sims and McElroy are as good as a fart in the wind come week 1.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Um... 1 goes to the practice squad, 1 gets cut. Pretty straightforward. Not sure if they could move 2 to the PS, in case Garrard gets hurt and you have to call up McElroy or Simms to be your 3rd string.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Week 1 should be

1-Sanchez

2-Geno

3-McElroy

Garrard has always been a bum and now hasn't played in 2 years.

Simms has to be listed on roster as favor to father, I don't even count him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

McElroy stinks and is worst of the bunch

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I think we might as well hang on to all 4 just incase

 

 

with this crappy team we'll need as many healthy QB's as can be

 

Why would Garrard or McElroy be the one dropped?  That makes no sense to me.  If anyone is dropped, it would be Simms.  Beyond him, if any QB is dropped, it ought to be Sanchez imo.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Can we drop Sanchez and smith?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The only QB whose job is completely safe in 2013 is Geno Smith.

I think the safe guess is Smith, Sanchez, and Garrard as the QBs on opening day, but a lot can happen between now and then. If Garrard is horrible, or gets hurt, he's gone. If Garrard and Smith are both playing well enough to merit starting, the team could look to cut ties with Sanchez. So McElroy's left to hope that Garrard is either great or terrible/injured, because otherwise he's pretty much out of a job.

If the fans are as brutal to Sanchez in the preseason as I believe they're capable of being, I really think he could be gone. It would be such a relief for the fan base.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Nope.  We are dropping Buttchez and Simms.  Garrard starts, Smith, then McElroy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

There are only 3 viable starters - Geno, Sanchez and Garrard. I'd be shocked if they weren't the 3 there on opening day.

 

Garrard could easily be gone if he's terrible, hasn't played in a long time and he may just be finished, he has to prove he can play. Looks decreasingly like were cutting Sanchez lose, sadly, which in fact, makes him the favourite to start.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

There are only 3 viable starters - Geno, Sanchez and Garrard. I'd be shocked if they weren't the 3 there on opening day.

 

Garrard could easily be gone if he's terrible, hasn't played in a long time and he may just be finished, he has to prove he can play. Looks decreasingly like were cutting Sanchez lose, sadly, which in fact, makes him the favourite to start.

 

52 turnovers in 2 years says Sanchez is not a viable starter.  That leaves only 2.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

52 turnovers in 2 years says Sanchez is not a viable starter.  That leaves only 2.

 

$17 Million says he is. Which puts it back to 3.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I think we might as well hang on to all 4 just incase

 

 

with this crappy team we'll need as many healthy QB's as can be

 

Garrard, Smith and Mcelroy or Simms will be the only 3 on the roster for the start of the season. Bank.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Is it just me with the thinking of, WTF is wrong with everyone considering Matt Simms as an actual qB option?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Sanchez/Garrard>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Smith

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Is it just me with the thinking of, WTF is wrong with everyone considering Matt Simms as an actual qB option?

 

I feel the same way when I hear Mark Sanchez as an actual qB option.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Sanchez/Garrard>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Smith

 

R U HIGH?

 

Garrard, MAYBE, Sanchez, my 4 year old is better than Sanchez

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

R U HIGH?

 

Garrard, MAYBE, Sanchez, my 4 year old is better than Sanchez

To early

 

 

Well, if that's true get the kid an agent.  

 

Sanchez had the year from hell last year.  Other then that he's been a middeling NFL QB

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Is it just me with the thinking of, WTF is wrong with everyone considering Matt Simms as an actual qB option?

Simms is awful. There's no reason he should still be on the team. None. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The only thing McElroy and Simms are going to be competing for is a spot on the practice squad.  Other than that, they'll need either an injury to one of the other QBs or some desperate team being willing to cough up something (anything) for Sanchez, in which case McElroy moves into the #3 spot and Simms to the PS.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0