Smashmouth Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 45 minutes ago, Paradis said: Something absurd like 18-20 a year well that really ****s the market for Chark and Robinson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 1 hour ago, Sperm Edwards said: @BornJetsFan1983 Finally, I'm the first one to do one of these lmao i heard this is the car and all i could think about was doing what you just did but i wouldn't be home in time. lol 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 between Berrios and Tomlinson that " Fire JD " thread got quiet real fast. poor JD haters were just getting started. 1 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetstream23 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 1 hour ago, jetstream23 said: This girl's constant tweeting every day since the end of the season made it happen. Maybe JD just got so annoyed with her that he signed Berrios? lol But she may be the real MVP here of getting Braxton's deal done. Boom! He lit her up and sent her a killer shoutout. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 30 minutes ago, Matt39 said: WR is still a critical need. Draft at least 2 in rounds 1-3. They're not drafting two of them by round 3. I'd expect at #10 - or later if they trade down from there, or one of their high round 2 picks at the latest - but there'll probably be another lower-end veteran signing after the dust settles. They didn't sign Berrios at $6MM/year be the WR5/6. If they do take a second one it'll be in/around round 5 (or later, since I'm still expecting him to trade down in at least one spot). Also possible the team hasn't 100% given up on Mims yet. 96%, yeah maybe, but not 100% lol. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets723 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Good deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 7 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: They're not drafting two of them by round 3. I'd expect at #10 - or later if they trade down from there, or one of their high round 2 picks at the latest - but there'll probably be another lower-end veteran signing after the dust settles. They didn't sign Berrios at $6MM/year be the WR5/6. If they do take a second one it'll be in/around round 5 (or later, since I'm still expecting him to trade down in at least one spot). Also possible the team hasn't 100% given up on Mims yet. 96%, yeah maybe, but not 100% lol. I’m all for building depth at positions that are important and where the Jets are typically always hurt at. If two rookie receivers squeeze someone else out of the rotation, that’s a good thing. Having Berrios as your 1 bc of injuries is bad. Less important position but the same goes for RB. They need to draft these guys every year. Stop worrying about DB’s and rotational DT’s. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dax89 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 16 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: They're not drafting two of them by round 3. I'd expect at #10 - or later if they trade down from there, or one of their high round 2 picks at the latest - but there'll probably be another lower-end veteran signing after the dust settles. They didn't sign Berrios at $6MM/year be the WR5/6. If they do take a second one it'll be in/around round 5 (or later, since I'm still expecting him to trade down in at least one spot). Also possible the team hasn't 100% given up on Mims yet. 96%, yeah maybe, but not 100% lol. I do expect 2 pass catchers in rounds 2-3. One of them being a TE. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 both are good signings. berrios shows up for every game and has been pretty durable. tomlinson has been a decent oline player. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sciond Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 JD is killing it thus far 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornJetsFan1983 Posted March 14, 2022 Share Posted March 14, 2022 3 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said: Um, I was willing to go as high as $7.5 or $8M per dude. Christian Kirk is making over twice that per, over 4 years. lmao. 8 good god Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
More Cowbell Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 1 hour ago, BornJetsFan1983 said: 8 good god Would have been worth every Penny and that’s a long way away from Christian Kirk money, ya goof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 4 hours ago, Dax89 said: I do expect 2 pass catchers in rounds 2-3. One of them being a TE. So do I. Just not 2 WRs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 4 hours ago, Matt39 said: I’m all for building depth at positions that are important and where the Jets are typically always hurt at. If two rookie receivers squeeze someone else out of the rotation, that’s a good thing. Having Berrios as your 1 bc of injuries is bad. Less important position but the same goes for RB. They need to draft these guys every year. Stop worrying about DB’s and rotational DT’s. Worry shmurry. They need another starting LB more than they need a WR5. WR5 isn’t a “critical need” imo, let alone a rookie WR5. If someone sticks out as a can’t-pass-on prospect, yeah I’ve got no problem with that. But there’s depth and there’s depth. They need starters at other positions more than a 5th/6th wideout who’ll work with the QB almost never, and odds are will be the one who’s squeezed out unless they chose so poorly in round 1 and is better - as a rookie - than the 3 returning WRs. And Mr. Mims lol. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 5 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: Worry shmurry. They need another starting LB more than they need a WR5. WR5 isn’t a “critical need” imo, let alone a rookie WR5. If someone sticks out as a can’t-pass-on prospect, yeah I’ve got no problem with that. But there’s depth and there’s depth. They need starters at other positions more than a 5th/6th wideout who’ll work with the QB almost never, and odds are will be the one who’s squeezed out unless they chose so poorly in round 1 and is better - as a rookie - than the 3 returning WRs. And Mr. Mims lol. Moore and Davis staying healthy is unlikely. I’m factoring that in too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj71787 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 5 hours ago, doitny said: between Berrios and Tomlinson that " Fire JD " thread got quiet real fast. poor JD haters were just getting started. Give it 1 loss and people will flock back to it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naturalscience Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 Perfect. Player got a nice bump in pay. A nice guarantee. The team didn't overpay and got a great contributor back. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 39 minutes ago, Matt39 said: Moore and Davis staying healthy is unlikely. I’m factoring that in too. Teams don’t draft a WR5 before drafting starters out of fear of two simultaneous WR injuries If Moore and Davis are both injured at the same time again, then you’re still just talking about a 3rd WR and most likely for 1-3 games at that (if even that many). Also it’s different than last year since they’ll have 2 TEs and last year they had zero, so any WR injury was magnified that much more. So I still say the only way they should look to drafting a 2nd rookie WR as early as round 3 is if it’s a pure BAP selection (and I’m 100% behind them if that’s what they do) — but it’d be value-based because they just couldn’t pass up on the guy they took; not a purely position-based pick. Really, they’ll be fine even if they don’t draft two of them. R1 rookie WR (or could be top of R2) Moore Davis Berrios R2 rookie TE Uzomah Probably another cheap veteran WR Really, this is enough that they aren’t painted into a corner to draft another WR in round 3 as though they’d be in “critical need” territory. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maynard13 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 Bargain Basement Braxton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 Very surprised if this kid doesn't do big things for us going forward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 59 minutes ago, jj71787 said: Give it 1 loss and people will flock back to it they will be back way before then. probably by Wednesday when we dont get a #1 WR 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal N of Provo Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 48 minutes ago, doitny said: they will be back way before then. probably by Wednesday when we dont get a #1 WR The Jets have 3 WRs who have potential, but all need to take big a step forward in different ways. That’s far from from a given. Dangerous roll of the dice at an important position but everything else looks like there is a good plan, so I’ll wait and see. Free agent WR or not. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornJetsFan1983 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 16 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said: Would have been worth every Penny and that’s a long way away from Christian Kirk money, ya goof. lol no way that is where we disagree, I'm a Joe Douglas type and you are a Macc type....as time has shown us your approach does not work in the long run. Even if you get a good player giving money for moneys sake is not worth it. CJ mosely is perfect example. Macc just kept piling on the cash until he left Baltimorewell anyway we just disagree. You have to be glad we didnt have to overpay him, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lith Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 This one is official (no need to wait until the league year starts to re-sign your own). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 3 hours ago, BornJetsFan1983 said: lol no way that is where we disagree, I'm a Joe Douglas type and you are a Macc type.... Oh GTFO with that sir. I was ripping on Mike Maccagnan years before he finally got fired, and have been known as one of Douglas' biggest supporters. Me being willing to spend an extra $1-$2M on a valuable slot receiver/returner does not put me in a pro-Macc / anti-Douglas camp, and you can kindly GFY for suggesting this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 2 hours ago, Lith said: This one is official (no need to wait until the league year starts to re-sign your own). "Sophia is Back!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornJetsFan1983 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 16 minutes ago, Jetsfan80 said: Oh GTFO with that sir. I was ripping on Mike Maccagnan years before he finally got fired, and have been known as one of Douglas' biggest supporters. Me being willing to spend an extra $1-$2M on a valuable slot receiver/returner does not put me in a pro-Macc / anti-Douglas camp, and you can kindly GFY for suggesting this. yet you want to overspend on guys, One of the biggest thingJoe doesnt do and Macc did. I think it squarely puts you in the Macc Camp. Over paying guys instead of sticking to yoru guns and paying guys what they are worth. Im not sure what GFY means but Im sure it is just your mind breaking at the realization you would be Macc in the NFL and not like Joe. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 1 minute ago, BornJetsFan1983 said: yet you want to overspend on guys, One of the biggest thingJoe doesnt do and Macc did. I think it squarely puts you in the Macc Camp. Over paying guys instead of sticking to yoru guns and paying guys what they are worth. Im not sure what GFY means but Im sure it is just your mind breaking at the realization you would be Macc in the NFL and not like Joe. I was willing to "overspend" on ONE guy, not several. You are annoying. GFY means "Go f**k yourself". So go do that, please, instead of completely mischaracterizing my opinions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 3 minutes ago, BornJetsFan1983 said: yet you want to overspend on guys, One of the biggest thingJoe doesnt do and Macc did. I think it squarely puts you in the Macc Camp. Over paying guys instead of sticking to yoru guns and paying guys what they are worth. Im not sure what GFY means but Im sure it is just your mind breaking at the realization you would be Macc in the NFL and not like Joe. It means "Get Flacco, immediatelY" Used in a sentence: "Hey JD, GFY!" 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornJetsFan1983 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 Just now, Jetsfan80 said: I was willing to "overspend" on ONE guy, not several. You are annoying. GFY means "Go f**k yourself". So go do that, please, instead of completely mischaracterizing my opinions. Mischaracterizing you would be like saying you drink coffee coffee all the time and wear dumb glasses while not knowing how to do your job. "overpaying just one guy" as you put it, is Macc - esk. and then crying about it is even more Macc - esk somehow Be better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornJetsFan1983 Posted March 15, 2022 Share Posted March 15, 2022 4 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said: It means "Get Flacco, immediatelY" Used in a sentence: "Hey JD, GFY!" lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.