I want the Jets next QB to be...

[Maxman]

Go on record, who do you want.

[Maxman]

I wanted to limit this to 7 so @T0mShane took the last spot over Zach Wilson.

[oatmeal]

This crazy bastard 

[prime21]

Rodgers for two years and hope Zack learns how to be a QB.

[Smashmouth]

Mike White 

[Barry McCockinner]

Best available QB is Rodgers so that's who we should go after. Douglas has opened a window if we have QB. You can't waste those opportunities. 

[Barry McCockinner]

1 minute ago, Smashmouth said:

Mike White 

 

 

[Flightattendant]

Did anyone else watch a single Packers game this year ?

[Mogglez]

I selected Lamar Jackson, despite the fact that he is unlikely to be available, so my realistic answer would be Rodgers.  That being said, if we can land young franchise QB, who is a former league MVP, I’ll take that every single time.

[RedBeardedSavage]

Rodgers.

Lamar is tempting but I think the cost in both picks and dollars would be exorbitant.

Let's give ol' immunized a shot for a year or two with a young talented roster.

[Maxman]

I voted for Rodgers but I am coming around on Carr. His showcase at the pro bowl skills competition sold me. 

Seriously though in some ways Carr is more exciting because the team keeps all their draft picks and he is young.

The two years with Rodgers thing and hope Zach matures scares me.

[sciond]

I will stick with Mike White. We need to develop our own guys as it most effective.

[Bocajetfan]

Voted TOmShane behind a poor line ? lol

[nj meadowlands]

3 minutes ago, Maxman said:

I voted for Rodgers but I am coming around on Carr. His showcase at the pro bowl skills competition sold me. 

Seriously though in some ways Carr is more exciting because the team keeps all their draft picks and he is young.

The two years with Rodgers thing and hope Zach matures scares me.

Would rather go Tannehill if it's not Rodgers or Lamar

[Green Ghost]

If we can’t get Carr, Rodgers ( who i don’t want) or Lamar(who I would love to see here) I’d go Mayfield ( I think he’d surprise a lot of people here), Minshew ( we might strike gold with this guy… who knows?), but no matter which way we go, I just don’t buy into the idea that after two years of horrible results Zach Wilson is going to learn how to play QB watching a two year replacement.

[JohnnyLV]

24 minutes ago, Maxman said:

Go on record, who do you want.

None of the above?

[Green Ghost]

7 minutes ago, sciond said:

I will stick with Mike White. We need to develop our own guys as it most effective.

A lot of people will think you’re crazy for saying that, but really the only reason to argue against it is fear of him always being injured. Yet a lot of people want Jimmy G, which just doesn’t make sense to me.

[heymangold]

14 minutes ago, Mogglez said:

I selected Lamar Jackson, despite the fact that he is unlikely to be available, so my realistic answer would be Rodgers.  That being said, if we can land young franchise QB, who is a former league MVP, I’ll take that every single time.

This is me as well. Lamar is the best option available.  Rodgers is next.

[Green Ghost]

4 minutes ago, johnnysd said:

None of the above?

Who then?

Minshew, Trubisky, Mike White? … please don’t say Zach unless you’re down to tank for a guy in ‘24 ( which I’d be okay with)

[chirorob]

4 minutes ago, Green Ghost said:

A lot of people will think you’re crazy for saying that, but really the only reason to argue against it is fear of him always being injured. Yet a lot of people want Jimmy G, which just doesn’t make sense to me.

If White wasn't always hurt, I'd be fine with him.  But he is.

I 100% on Jimmy G, they guy is older and always hurt.  I do not get the love for him.

[Green Ghost]

5 minutes ago, heymangold said:

This is me as well. Lamar is the best option available.  Rodgers is next.

To me, they’re apples and oranges.
Two completely different type players at opposite points in their career. I don’t understand you and @Mogglez equating the two?

I’d love to get Lamar, but want no part of Rodgers.

[Smashmouth]

22 minutes ago, Barry McCockinner said:

 

 

Glass Joe Garroppolo 

[32EBoozer]

9 minutes ago, Maxman said:

I voted for Rodgers but I am coming around on Carr. His showcase at the pro bowl skills competition sold me. 

Seriously though in some ways Carr is more exciting because the team keeps all their draft picks and he is young.

The two years with Rodgers thing and hope Zach matures scares me.

I voted AR but if Carr can be THE GUY, I'd be all for it. The ZW experiment goes out the window and we have our FQB for the next 4-5 years. Also allows JD to construct the contract in a way that when QW, AVT, GW are due extensions, we can fit them easily into our cap.

[Jets Things]

Anyone but Lamar. Hard pass on a slightly more talented, slightly less injured RGIII. 

[Smashmouth]

23 minutes ago, Flightattendant said:

Did anyone else watch a single Packers game this year ?

Did you watch the MVP 2 years in a row one year prior to them taking away all his WR's ?

[#27TheDominator]

17 minutes ago, Flightattendant said:

Did anyone else watch a single Packers game this year ?

They all watched one, but they all think the Jets defense is super bowl ready so it is discounted.

[#27TheDominator]

6 minutes ago, Green Ghost said:

To me, they’re apples and oranges.
Two completely different type players at opposite points in their career. I don’t understand you and @Mogglez equating the two?

I’d love to get Lamar, but want no part of Rodgers.

For age and career point I get it, but I question whether we would have to redo the entire scheme to fit Jackson.  It seems they set themselves up to plug in Rodgers.   I honestly don't want to mortgage everything for either, but I get how things are more balanced than young up and comer vs. over the hill. 

[Bronx]

[Jet Nut]

4 minutes ago, Smashmouth said:

Did you watch the MVP 2 years in a row one year prior to them taking away all his WR's ?

While playing with a broken thumb last season

[JetsMetsDevilsPA]

If no (1) Rodgers and (2) Carr, bring in the BakerBoy.  How bad can it get from where we are now?  He's still young and can throw the ball a ton.

[Barry McCockinner]

6 minutes ago, #27TheDominator said:

They all watched one, but they all think the Jets defense is super bowl ready so it is discounted.

It is. Watch what happens when we have an offense that doesn't go 3 and out all game and we actually play with a lead. Defense gets to be in more passing situations will create more turnovers because the other team will be forced to press.

Last year teams had the luxury of being really patient on offense.

[PepPep]

27 minutes ago, Flightattendant said:

Did anyone else watch a single Packers game this year ?

I actually did. 

My brother in law is a big Packers fan. 

The Packers looked BAD this year. And it was not Rodgers. Their star players seemed to underperform or be dinged up. 

Seemed like the offense struggled every time I watched them and Rodgers was the only  one making anything happen. Christian Watkins started to look good towards the later part of the season but it seemed to be in large part because of Rodgers. The run game was there but not close to intimidating. The defense was there but did not move the needle. This is why they missed the playoffs and ended the season 8-9. 

If Rodgers was 100% and in his prime he would have probably carried that team to the playoffs but not much further than that, IMO. 

[Green Ghost]

6 minutes ago, #27TheDominator said:

For age and career point I get it, but I question whether we would have to redo the entire scheme to fit Jackson.  It seems they set themselves up to plug in Rodgers.   I honestly don't want to mortgage everything for either, but I get how things are more balanced than young up and comer vs. over the hill. 

You make a good point about structuring the offense around Lamar. I’ll be honest, I haven’t considered that, and I should have.

My only counter would be I’ve seen where Lamar doesn’t want to be thought of as a running QB, and would prefer to play from the pocket more. The fly in that ointment is does that make him less appealing, or more?

[playtowinthegame]

Give me Derek Carr and let Joe Douglas do his thing in the NFL Draft. 

 

Note: I wouldn't mind the 26-year-old Lamar Jackson if that's a possibility, but I can't see the Ravens letting him walk away. 

[#27TheDominator]

1 minute ago, Green Ghost said:

You make a good point about structuring the offense around Lamar. I’ll be honest,  I haven’t considered that as much as I should have.

My only counter would be I’ve seen where Lamar doesn’t want to be thought of as a running QB, and would prefer to play from the pocket more. The fly in that ointment is does that make him less appealing, or more?

I haven't watched him enough to tell.  I have too many Ravens fan friends that have poisoned me against the idea.  I am also allergic to throwing a ton of money and picks at one player, so I don't really like any big splash sh*t.