Popular Post jetsons Posted March 18 Popular Post Share Posted March 18 imo... Total BS... Looks like she was getting reamed by her manager for talking to him and not doing her job... she made this up to appear she was innocent... she should be arrested & Michael Irvin should sue her & the NFL Network for sending him home. 7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post peebag Posted March 18 Popular Post Share Posted March 18 Anything that gets Michael Irvin off my TV screen, I support. 3 1 1 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Green Ghost Posted March 18 Popular Post Share Posted March 18 I don’t want to get in trouble here, so I’ll just say I hope Michael sues everyone and wins, especially the woman and Marriot. (although I’d love to see ESPN and the NFL Network pay through the nose also) 9 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Dunnie Posted March 18 Popular Post Share Posted March 18 If this is all there is ... At a minimum the accuser and.orchestrator deserve whatever they get.I dont have the same feeling about Marriot ... This is a subsidiary owned by them. And unless they were somehow involved .. I don't see it.The world we live in is upside down.Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk 10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenwichjetfan Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 6 hours ago, jetsons said: imo... Total BS... Looks like she was getting reamed by her manager for talking to him and not doing her job... she made this up to appear she was innocent... she should be arrested & Michael Irvin should sue her & the NFL Network for sending him home. 20 mins?!?!? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kleckineau Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 Suspect she may have become pissed off and vindictive when she made her lets have a good time tonight move on him and he blew her off. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Integrity28 Posted March 18 Popular Post Share Posted March 18 Let’s the legal courts sort it out, not the court of public opinion. Give less ****s. 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammybighead Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 Was Irvin fired from his jobs or just placed on leave pending the investigation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Kleckineau Posted March 18 Popular Post Share Posted March 18 1 hour ago, Integrity28 said: Let’s the legal courts sort it out, not the court of public opinion. Give less ****s. Yeah because history shows courts never miss and no life has ever been ruined by something exactly like this. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 37 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: Let’s the legal courts sort it out, not the court of public opinion. Give less ****s. This, 100%. With that said, our court system tends to have several very serious biases, pro-money advantage, pro-men in sexual-based cases and pro-famous people. So, yeah… 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangerous Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 Irvin’s reputation precedes him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butterfield Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 The video is worthless. Doesn’t prove anything one way or another. The claim is that he asked her if she had ever had a big black man inside her. How would a video prove that or not? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 1 minute ago, Butterfield said: The video is worthless. Doesn’t prove anything one way or another. Exactly ... which is why I said ... if this is all there is ... there is no case. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butterfield Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 1 minute ago, Dunnie said: Exactly ... which is why I said ... if this is all there is ... there is no case. I agree with you. But, Irvin ain’t winning anything on this either. At least not if I was on the jury. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corn Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 I'm glad this one shows Irwin smacking the hell out of himself like he did something wrong.(approx 13.15) just when he finished talking and staring at her. Still not guilty of anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butterfield Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 6 minutes ago, Corn said: I'm glad this one shows Irwin smacking the hell out of himself like he did something wrong.(approx 13.15) just when he finished talking and staring at her. Still not guilty of anything. No one is suing him for guilt. If Irvin has an issue with anyone it should be his employers for not doing a more in depth investigation before punishing him. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 1 hour ago, Warfish said: This, 100%. With that said, our court system tends to have several very serious biases, pro-money advantage, pro-men in sexual-based cases and pro-famous people. So, yeah… Yea, agreed. Not getting fixed with this case, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 1 hour ago, Kleckineau said: Yeah because history shows courts never miss and no life has ever been ruined by something exactly like this. You’re right. I e reconsidered my position… History has overwhelmingly proven that grandstanding and virtue signaling on the internet rights all the wrongs of society. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal N of Provo Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 No need to follow the play by play in something like this. There is clearly more info, angles, etc… I’ll be curious to see the final result is, but it will probably be inconclusive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 6 hours ago, Corn said: I'm glad this one shows Irwin smacking the hell out of himself like he did something wrong.(approx 13.15) just when he finished talking and staring at her. Still not guilty of anything. I thought the same thing, and honestly, it is sad this is even news worthy. Did he actually assult her, allegedly? Are we only talking about verbal correspondence? I really haven't followed it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corn Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 29 minutes ago, hawk said: I thought the same thing, and honestly, it is sad this is even news worthy. Did he actually assult her, allegedly? Are we only talking about verbal correspondence? I really haven't followed it. The woman only claimed verbal sexual misconduct! On that alone he gets kicked out of the hotel and banned from his commentator Super Bowl appearance. It's not news worthy but In this society People have been getting fired for accusations or bad manners for some time now. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet_Engine1 Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 15 hours ago, peebag said: Anything that gets Michael Irvin off my TV screen, I support. Why, you don't like incomprehensible shouting? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Brown Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 8 hours ago, Butterfield said: The video is worthless. Doesn’t prove anything one way or another. The claim is that he asked her if she had ever had a big black man inside her. How would a video prove that or not? If he said what you allege would that constitute a sexual assault to you? I see the claim is verbal sexual misconduct which is an amorphous claim at best. Here is a general definition of the foregoing: when one makes deliberate or repeated unwelcome verbal comments, gestures, or physical contact of a sexual nature is also engaging in sexual harassment." We have lost our way. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 7 hours ago, Integrity28 said: You’re right. I e reconsidered my position… History has overwhelmingly proven that grandstanding and virtue signaling on the internet rights all the wrongs of society. We could determine guilt or innocence by examining any number of photos of him on the web to look for suspect moles & marks that'd indicate he's a witch. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 I’ve met Irving quite a few times in stripclubs and he’s no angel so I pretty much believe what she said. I’m sure what she said he said is true but what she said happened doesn’t seem to be true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremy2020 Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 A bunch of men who get upset when people call their teenage boy mancrush bad at football on the internet are definitely the right group to figure this out for society. Get to work boys. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hal N of Provo Posted March 18 Share Posted March 18 18 minutes ago, jeremy2020 said: A bunch of men who get upset when people call their teenage boy mancrush bad at football on the internet are definitely the right group to figure this out for society. Get to work boys. Hey! You’re not talking about our sweet Zachary, are you? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butterfield Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 4 hours ago, Charlie Brown said: If he said what you allege would that constitute a sexual assault to you? I see the claim is verbal sexual misconduct which is an amorphous claim at best. Here is a general definition of the foregoing: when one makes deliberate or repeated unwelcome verbal comments, gestures, or physical contact of a sexual nature is also engaging in sexual harassment." We have lost our way. What claim? No one is asking him to be arrested or sued. He may have engaged in bad behavior. I don’t know. They thought he did, and they asked him to leave and notified his employer. Big deal. I notify employers of employee bad behavior all the time. That isn’t illegal either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 5 hours ago, Sperm Edwards said: We could determine guilt or innocence by examining any number of photos of him on the web to look for suspect moles & marks that'd indicate he's a witch. What also floats in water? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Brown Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 47 minutes ago, Butterfield said: What claim? No one is asking him to be arrested or sued. He may have engaged in bad behavior. I don’t know. They thought he did, and they asked him to leave and notified his employer. Big deal. I notify employers of employee bad behavior all the time. That isn’t illegal either. No one said informing someone of bad behavior is inappropriate or illegal, certainly not me. But to me, it is a "Big Deal" when as here you are potentially destroying someone's public life. If you noted, I responded to your initial post, and your graphic statements, which I never heard anywhere and I am now asking you then since you have experience in turning folks in and/or reporting them what to you constitutes Bad Behavior? Indeed, since it is not a legal standard, which I tend to go by, then what standard do you use when you report some folks for "bad behavior"??? Being drunk in public, going over to a man or woman, and asking them back to your room? Just wondering..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butterfield Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 54 minutes ago, Charlie Brown said: No one said informing someone of bad behavior is inappropriate or illegal, certainly not me. But to me, it is a "Big Deal" when as here you are potentially destroying someone's public life. If you noted, I responded to your initial post, and your graphic statements, which I never heard anywhere and I am now asking you then since you have experience in turning folks in and/or reporting them what to you constitutes Bad Behavior? Indeed, since it is not a legal standard, which I tend to go by, then what standard do you use when you report some folks for "bad behavior"??? Being drunk in public, going over to a man or woman, and asking them back to your room? Just wondering..... Whatever I deem is bad behavior. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Brown Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just now, Butterfield said: Whatever I deem is bad behavior. Ok that makes sense..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butterfield Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Just now, Charlie Brown said: Ok that makes sense..... Yep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.