Jump to content

Positional value and day 2/3 strategy


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Maynard13 said:

All those 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th round picks aint doing squat to move up to mid round 2. JD will have to give up #72 and a 3rd next year and a 4th (129) this year to get into round 2. Take Corely then thereafter go get Pratt.  Pratt in early round 4 with the other 4th.  We dont need another TE or safety. Davis was resigned. We are set there.  We'd still have 134, 157 and 256 to pick up OL depth and another sleeper WR like Ryan Flourney. 

Corely round 3 - #72, next year's 3rd, and this years 4th #129

Round 4 #111 QB Pratt  

At 134, 157, 256 you look to find depth on the OL and grab another WR.  

Guard  Robinson,  Guard Zinter, Tackle Greenfiled, WR Cowing, WR Mcaffrey, Tackle Christian Jones,Tackle Javon Foster,  WR Flourney 

Agreed.  The free 4th and 5th rounder are nice but don't really allow us to get high into the 2nd.  If we package our 3rd, 4th and 4th we can only slide up to back end of round 2.  Maybe jump from 72 to around 56.  I think these wideouts are going to get scooped up, hoping a good one slides.

Our roster is pretty stacked, no way we end up keeping all these Day 3 picks.

 

 

RD1   RD2   RD3   RD4   RD5   RD6   RD7  
PK/TM   PK/TM   PK/TM   PK/TM   PK/TM   PK/TM   PK/TM  
  1  CHI 3000   33  BUF 580   65  CAR 265   101  CAR 96   136  DEN 38   177  MIN 20.6   221  BUF 3
  2  WAS 2600   34  NE 560   66  ARI 260   102  SEA 92   137  NE 37.5   178  PIT 20.2   222  WAS 2.6
  3  NE 2200   35  ARI 550   67  WAS 255   103  NE 88   138  ARI 37   179  SEA 19.8   223  LV 2.3
  4  ARI 1800   36  WAS 540   68  NE 250   104  ARI 86   139  WAS 36.5   180  NE 19.4   224  CIN 2
  5  LAC 1700   37  LAC 530   69  LAC 245   105  LAC 84   140  LAC 36   181  LAC 19   225  LAC 1.8
  6  NYG 1600   38  TEN 520   70  NYG 240   106  TEN 82   141  BUF 35.5   182  TEN 18.6   226  ARI 1.6
  7  TEN 1500   39  CAR 510   71  ARI 235   107  NYG 80   142  CAR 35   183  NYG 18.2   227  CLE 1.4
  8  ATL 1400   40  WAS 500   72  NYJ 230   108  MIN 78   143  ATL 34.5   184  MIA 17.8   228  BAL 1.2
  9  CHI 1350   41  GB 490   73  DAL 225   109  ATL 76   144  BUF 34   185  NYJ 17.4   229  LV 1
  10  MIN 1300   42  HOU 480   74  ATL 220   110  LAC 74   145  DEN 33.5   186  ARI 17   230  MIN 1
  11  NYJ 1250   43  ATL 470   75  CHI 215   111  NYJ 72   146  TEN 33   187  ATL 16.6   231  NE 1
  12  DEN 1200   44  LV 460   76  DEN 210   112  LV 70   147  DEN 32.6   188  HOU 16.2   232  MIN 1
  13  LV 1150   45  NO 450   77  LV 205   113  BAL 68   148  LV 32.3   189  HOU 15.8   233  DAL 1
  14  NO 1100   46  IND 440   78  WAS 200   114  JAX 66   149  CIN 31.8   190  NO 15.4   234  IND 1
  15  IND 1050   47  NYG 430   79  ATL 195   115  CIN 64   150  NO 31.4   191  IND 15   235  SEA 1
  16  SEA 1000   48  JAX 420   80  CIN 190   116  JAX 62   151  IND 31   192  SEA 14.6   236  JAX 1
  17  MIN 950   49  CIN 410   81  SEA 185   117  IND 60   152  WAS 30.6   193  NE 14.2   237  CIN 1
  18  CIN 900   50  PHI 400   82  IND 180   118  SEA 58   153  JAX 30.2   194  CIN 13.8   238  HOU 1
  19  LAR 875   51  PIT 390   83  LAR 175   119  PIT 56   154  LAR 29.8   195  PIT 13.4   239  NO 1
  20  PIT 850   52  LAR 380   84  PIT 170   120  PHI 54   155  LAR 29.4   196  LAR 13   240  CAR 1
  21  MIA 800   53  PHI 370   85  CLE 165   121  DEN 52   156  CLE 29   197  ATL 12.6   241  MIA 1
  22  PHI 780   54  CLE 360   86  HOU 160   122  CHI 50   157  NYJ 28.6   198  MIA 12.2   242  TEN 1
  23  JAX 760   55  MIA 350   87  DAL 155   123  HOU 49   158  MIA 28.2   199  NO 11.8   243  CLE 1
  24  DET 740   56  DAL 340   88  GB 150   124  SF 48   159  KC 27.8   200  CAR 11.4   244  DAL 1
  25  GB 720   57  TB 330   89  TB 145   125  TB 47   160  BUF 27.4   201  DET 11   245  GB 1
  26  TB 700   58  GB 320   90  ARI 140   126  GB 46   161  PHI 27   202  GB 10.6   246  TB 1
  27  ARI 680   59  HOU 310   91  GB 136   127  HOU 45   162  ARI 26.6   203  MIN 10.2   247  HOU 1
  28  KC 660   60  BUF 300   92  TB 132   128  BUF 44   163  BUF 26.2   204  BUF 9.8   248  KC 1
  29  DAL 640   61  DET 292   93  BAL 128   129  NYJ 43   164  DET 25.8   205  DET 9.4   249  DET 1
  30  BAL 620   62  BAL 284   94  SF 124   130  BAL 42   165  BAL 25.4   206  CLE 9   250  BAL 1
  31  SF 600   63  SF 276   95  BUF 120   131  KC 41   166  NYG 25   207  DEN 8.6   251  SF 1
  32  CAR 590   64  KC 270   96  JAX 116   132  SF 40   167  JAX 24.6   208  LV 8.2   252  TEN 1
                97  CIN 112   133  KC 39.5   168  NO 24.2   209  LAR 7.8   253  LAC 1
                98  PIT 108   134  NYJ 39   169  GB 23.8   210  PHI 7.4   254  LAR 1
                99  LAR 104   135  SF 38.5   170  NO 23.4   211  SF 7   255  GB 1
                100  WAS 100          171  PHI 23   212  JAX 6.6   256  DEN 1
                              172  PHI 22.6   213  LAR 6.2   257  NYJ 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Integrity28 said:

Primary needs: WR, TE, S

Secondary needs: QB, RB, DL

WR is the only glaring need that will necessitate a 2nd or 3rd round pick. Ideally we trade up to get a top-15 WR prospect, but we may be okay at 72.

TE, RB and S are positions where you can find excellent prospects later in the draft relative to the quality of the prospects at other positions… purely because of positional valuation. I think we can absolutely get a thumper to complement Breece and Izzy in 4th or 5th. I can also see us adding to the TE and S rooms in the same range. 

All this to say, I think we’re fortunate that when our picks are happen to align pretty well with the parts of the draft where value meets our specific needs.

It should be a fun couple of days seeing how they finish.

Listen, I agree with almost everything on your post.  The problem I have, is that some "experts" seem to think that we need to upgrade our TE position.  Bullsh*t!

Why?  Because all the brilliant minds made the dumb prediction that the Jets were 100% going to draft Brock Bowers, so in order to justify their belief, they said that the Jets were in need of a TE.  Again, Bullsh*t!

Remember this analogy:  "When all you have in your tool box is a hammer, then everything looks like a nail!"

Conklin had his best season as an NFL pro last year, and he is only 28 years old.  The braintrust on the Jets also believe that Ruckert will be a future star.  I don't care whether you believe it or not, but they have said it repeatedly, and well as Leger Douzable, who focuses on the Jets primarily.

I correctly predicted, rather emotionally, over and over again, that the Jets would no way draft Brock Bowers at #10.  I will make the next prediction right now:  The Jets will not be drafting a TE in this entire draft.  Okay?  

This is annoying to me.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Alka said:

Listen, I agree with almost everything on your post.  The problem I have, is that some "experts" seem to think that we need to upgrade our TE position.  Bullsh*t!

Why?  Because all the brilliant minds made the dumb prediction that the Jets were 100% going to draft Brock Bowers, so in order to justify their belief, they said that the Jets were in need of a TE.  Again, Bullsh*t!

Remember this analogy:  "When all you have in your tool box is a hammer, then everything looks like a nail!"

Conklin had his best season as an NFL pro last year, and he is only 28 years old.  The braintrust on the Jets also believe that Ruckert will be a future star.  I don't care whether you believe it or not, but they have said it repeatedly, and well as Leger Douzable, who focuses on the Jets primarily.

I correctly predicted, rather emotionally, over and over again, that the Jets would no way draft Brock Bowers at #10.  I will make the next prediction right now:  The Jets will not be drafting a TE in this entire draft.  Okay?  

This is annoying to me.

The prevailing word in this thread is Bullsheet. TE ? Bullsheet. RB? Bullsheet. DL Bullsheet. Safety? Bullsheet. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the roster is well set up to just draft players they like. Agree the need/position value thing lines up pretty well. 

Wide receiver - they could move up for someone they love. There are a couple guys I like. Think you could argue there's a better shot of hitting if they take two than pick one and with the pieces behind Wilson and Williams being Lazard, Gipson, Brownlee, and Charles I think they could use a little infusion of depth and talent.

Could easily add and roster developmental QB3, RB3, iOL. They could also definitely fit an edge. Safety wouldn't be that hard to fit either. And they absolutely could use long-term pieces at DT and LB if there's someone they like.

A sneaky big long-term need unless they extend guys, Sauce is the only corner they have signed for next year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Guilhermezmc said:

I think we're set at TE, they got Yeboah back and have Kuntz the PS guy.

 

RB2 LB and DT are much bigger needs

I'm not sure I agree. Conklin is our clear cut best guy and he's in the final year of his deal. After that it's a lot of question marks, besides Ruckert looking like a good blocker / functional TE2. Even if the Jets extend Conklin, a new TE wouldn't hurt as a development project.

I would group TE is a low priority move - I won't be upset if the Jets don't draft one, but I agree with tegrity's take that a 5th-7th rounder could help us in the future.

Of course, if we use multiple picks to move up, TE will quickly fall off the priority list behind RB, S, QB, etc 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Integrity28 said:

Primary needs: WR, TE, S

Secondary needs: QB, RB, DL

WR is the only glaring need that will necessitate a 2nd or 3rd round pick. Ideally we trade up to get a top-15 WR prospect, but we may be okay at 72.

TE, RB and S are positions where you can find excellent prospects later in the draft relative to the quality of the prospects at other positions… purely because of positional valuation. I think we can absolutely get a thumper to complement Breece and Izzy in 4th or 5th. I can also see us adding to the TE and S rooms in the same range. 

All this to say, I think we’re fortunate that when our picks are happen to align pretty well with the parts of the draft where value meets our specific needs.

It should be a fun couple of days seeing how they finish.

40 Picks until Jets are OTC. I'd be pouring over the Big Board making my best guesses on other team needs... If I'm JD, once I'm in the mid-40's I start calling teams in the mid-50's to see if they bare looking to deal. Can't be shy tonight. Being aggressive has worked for him recently... keep the mojo going and get your guy.

@Beerfish could conceivably go 2/2 on Jets picks. That would be quite the coup!

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Joe W. Namath said:

There is 0 need for a tight end.  We have 2 really good ones, one pretty good one and one with huge upside.  Might be one of the deepest tight end rooms in the nfl.  It was the reason Brock Bowers wasnt even on our board.

This isnt difficult folks.  The Jets are trading back in to the 2nd round and taking a stud receiver.

Book it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I really think AR is going to use Lazard more in a TE role than a traditional WR role.Wilson, Williams and day two pick will be the 3 primary WR’s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LIJetsFan said:

This is the guy I hope drops way too far so we can draft and stash him on IR:  Florida State QB Jordan Travis recovery from leg injury

I saw clips of this kid play.  Just sick. He has really good skills and Florida State played lights out in 2023.  Compared him to Zach Wilson, who went #2,  this kid may not even be drafted until round 5 or 6 or even 7.   How is that even possible? Yea he was inured and suffefred a broken leg but he's out of his boot from his injury and recovering well.  He's just making defenders look silly out there. He has Lamar Jackson vibes written all over him! I'm with you on taking him!

 

 

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Post of the Week 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really hope we’re able to grab Travis or Pratt. Would be huge. 

17 minutes ago, Maynard13 said:

I saw clips of this kid play.  Just sick. He has really good skills and Florida State played lights out in 2023.  Compared him to Zach Wilson, who went #2,  this kid may not even be drafted until round 5 or 6 or even 7.   How is that even possible? Yea he was inured and suffefred a broken leg but he's out of his boot from his injury and recovering well.  He's just making defenders look silly out there. He has Lamar Jackson vibes written all over him! I'm with you on taking him!

 

 

 

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Guilhermezmc said:

Kuntz sure, i just don't think they will cut yeboah just after extending him but what do i know right

Eh, you’re probably right, but whatever… cut him anyway so his truthers pee themselves.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Alka said:

Listen, I agree with almost everything on your post.  The problem I have, is that some "experts" seem to think that we need to upgrade our TE position.  Bullsh*t!

Why?  Because all the brilliant minds made the dumb prediction that the Jets were 100% going to draft Brock Bowers, so in order to justify their belief, they said that the Jets were in need of a TE.  Again, Bullsh*t!

Remember this analogy:  "When all you have in your tool box is a hammer, then everything looks like a nail!"

Conklin had his best season as an NFL pro last year, and he is only 28 years old.  The braintrust on the Jets also believe that Ruckert will be a future star.  I don't care whether you believe it or not, but they have said it repeatedly, and well as Leger Douzable, who focuses on the Jets primarily.

I correctly predicted, rather emotionally, over and over again, that the Jets would no way draft Brock Bowers at #10.  I will make the next prediction right now:  The Jets will not be drafting a TE in this entire draft.  Okay?  

This is annoying to me.

I’m not an expert. Those are the needs I believe we have. I have no confidence in Yeboah or Kuntz and think it makes sense to have a full TE room. I’m not saying “upgrade”. I don’t expect a 3rd-5th rounder to suddenly put Conklin and Ruck on the bench. I think we need a viable 3rd TE, same as I don’t expect the WR we need to bench Mike or Garrett, or the S to start right away. I just see these as shallow parts of our roster that benefit from investment.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, slats said:

Agree completely that TE is not a need. I’d like to see them use two of their remaining seven picks on WRs; their third rounder and one more in the fourth. A RB wouldn’t bother me, either, preferably a thumper. 

Would you lose it if they didn’t take a WR at 72 and then double dipped in the 4th?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Integrity28 said:

I wouldn’t be mad at this

 

IMG_4494.jpeg

I agree that there may be a really good player available at 72, that isn't a WR. 
 

I’d be OK with that as long as they take 2 WR in the 4th.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Maynard13 said:

I saw clips of this kid play.  Just sick. He has really good skills and Florida State played lights out in 2023.  Compared him to Zach Wilson, who went #2,  this kid may not even be drafted until round 5 or 6 or even 7.   How is that even possible? Yea he was inured and suffefred a broken leg but he's out of his boot from his injury and recovering well.  He's just making defenders look silly out there. He has Lamar Jackson vibes written all over him! I'm with you on taking him!

 

 

 

All good points, but will Rodgers be okay with the team drafting a QB named Jordan?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, NYJCAP2 said:

I agree that there may be a really good player available at 72, that isn't a WR. 
 

I’d be OK with that as long as they take 2 WR in the 4th.

The fans all want WR, but what would that even look like in 2024? That guy plays WR4/5 behind Wilson, Williams, Lazard, and maybe Gipson. 

It's one thing to draft Rome/Bowers and say that pick is going to be WR2/3, but at a certain point, these guys become developmental, and the Jets still really aren't making Developmental picks right now. Rodgers' hand signals and whatnot are not rookie WR-friendly. And the team already has a KR/PR so that usual rookie job is taken. 

side note: Olu's gonna play a lot. Like 6-8 starts. Maybe the whole year. The fans don't want to consider this outcome, but it's pretty likely 

Bring on a Kris Jenkins at 72 or BPA whoever that is. If it's a WR, that's awesome too. I just don't see it as a huge need atm

right now the roster needs are RB2, QB3 (do teams even do that anymore?) DT3, safety and maybe a CJ Mosely replacement 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NYJCAP2 said:

Would you lose it if they didn’t take a WR at 72 and then double dipped in the 4th?

I’d somewhat lose it tonight and then regain my composure tomorrow. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bitonti said:

The fans all want WR but what would that even look like in 2024? that guy plays WR4/5 behind Wilson, Williams, Lazard, and maybe Gipson? 

It's one thing to draft Rome/Bowers and say that guys going to be WR2/3 but at a certain point these guys become developmental and the Jets still really aren't making Developmental picks right now. Rodger's hand signals and whatnot are not rookie WR friendly. And the team already has a KR/PR so that usual rookie job is taken. 

side note Olu's gonna play a lot. Like 6-8 starts. Maybe the whole year. The fans don't want to consider this outcome, but it's pretty likely 

so yes Bring on a Kris Jenkins at 72 or BPA whoever that is. If it's a WR that's awesome too. I just don't see it as a huge need atm

right now the honest needs are RB2, safety and maybe a CJ Mosely replacement 

Mike Williams isn’t dependable, health wise so we need the depth. If the receiver is good, he will be fine. Rodger’s last year in GB saw him be successful with Christian Watson. Even Doubs had good games with Rodgers. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bitonti said:

The fans all want WR but what would that even look like in 2024? that guy plays WR4/5 behind Wilson, Williams, Lazard, and maybe Gipson? 

It's one thing to draft Rome/Bowers and say that guys going to be WR2/3 but at a certain point these guys become developmental and the Jets still really aren't making Developmental picks right now. Rodger's hand signals and whatnot are not rookie WR friendly. And the team already has a KR/PR so that usual rookie job is taken. 

side note Olu's gonna play a lot. Like 6-8 starts. Maybe the whole year. The fans don't want to consider this outcome, but it's pretty likely 

so yes Bring on a Kris Jenkins at 72 or BPA whoever that is. If it's a WR that's awesome too. I just don't see it as a huge need atm

right now the honest needs are RB2, QB3 (do teams even do that anymore?) DT3, safety and maybe a CJ Mosely replacement 

If the jets decided they want a legit #2 wr they can trade into the mid 2nd round and take a guy they really like.  If not they can sit where they are and then decide if it’s worth taking a wr in the early 3rd knowing they have 3 picks in the 4th round, or go with their favorite DT or S and then draft wr depth on day 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Integrity28 said:

I’m not an expert. Those are the needs I believe we have. I have no confidence in Yeboah or Kuntz and think it makes sense to have a full TE room. I’m not saying “upgrade”. I don’t expect a 3rd-5th rounder to suddenly put Conklin and Ruck on the bench. I think we need a viable 3rd TE, same as I don’t expect the WR we need to bench Mike or Garrett, or the S to start right away. I just see these as shallow parts of our roster that benefit from investment.

 

I think the most important part of your post is, that you have no confidence in Yeboah or Kuntz.  

The question is: "What does JD and scouts think of these 2 guys?"  

Both are athletic freaks of nature.  The second question is: "Is the TE that we are picking up in the later rounds, a better prospect then the the guys we currently have on the roster?"

Anyone that we draft in the later rounds will be a lower tier draft pick than Brock Bowers.  Will the player they are looking at grade better than Yeboah or Kuntz?

I will answer the question for you.  The answer is no.  This is why the Jets will not draft one this year.  

And by the way, either Yeboah or Kuntz, I forget who, was a free agent this offseason, and the Jets chose to sign them to a new contract to stay on the team.  That would indicate to me, that they have confidence in these guys going forward, to continue to try to develop them.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rayzor said:

are you guys willing to trade our 3rd and three 4's to get to the bottom 3rd of the 2nd?  That's what it will cost according to the value chart which was pretty accurate with the Vikings trade.  The better option might be to trade next year's picks to get a WR to contribute this year but that might shorten the list of teams willing to do so.  With our needs, it might be better to stay put and let the chips fall.

Chart-wise just the early 4th alone, or both of our lower 4ths while keeping pick #111, gets them to picks 59-60 (depending how willing a team is to move down). That's roughly (the middle of) the bottom 1/3 of the 2nd round, no?

Yes they could trade a pick from next year's draft, which would probably be our 3rd rounder next year (paired with our 3rd rounder this year), instead of the earliest of our three picks in the 4th. I think they'd choose a 4th (or a pair of 4ths) this year while we're holding 3 of them instead of our 3rd rounder next season. Could also depend what wiggle room Douglas, presumably from his hot seat, has in trading next season's day 1 or 2 draft picks away.

image.png

Depends which WR has lasted to what pick before deciding to move up, if there's a guy they're so focused on getting, which I guess is how it should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Augustiniak said:

If the jets decided they want a legit #2 wr they can trade into the mid 2nd round and take a guy they really like.  If not they can sit where they are and then decide if it’s worth taking a wr in the early 3rd knowing they have 3 picks in the 4th round, or go with their favorite DT or S and then draft wr depth on day 3

there's a ton of great prospects right now but they'd have to get to the top of the round for the Ladd/Roman types - the guys who really could make a run at Williams/Lazard reps.  it would take a future pick probably. 

not saying it's impossible it just doesn't feel like a dire need is all I'm saying 

it's hard for me to imagine a scenario where the Jets draft a WR today and that guy gets real playing time this year and soaks up targets from Aaron  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Alka said:

I think the most important part of your post is, that you have no confidence in Yeboah or Kuntz.  

The question is: "What does JD and scouts think of these 2 guys?"  

Both are athletic freaks of nature.  The second question is: "Is the TE that we are picking up in the later rounds, a better prospect then the the guys we currently have on the roster?"

Anyone that we draft in the later rounds will be a lower tier draft pick than Brock Bowers.  Will the player they are looking at grade better than Yeboah or Kuntz?

I will answer the question for you.  The answer is no.  This is why the Jets will not draft one this year.  

And by the way, either Yeboah or Kuntz, I forget who, was a free agent this offseason, and the Jets chose to sign them to a new contract to stay on the team.  That would indicate to me, that they have confidence in these guys going forward, to continue to try to develop them.

Yeboah got a new deal to keep him around. Hes a core special teamer, though. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tranquilo said:

Mike Williams isn’t dependable, health wise so we need the depth. If the receiver is good, he will be fine. Rodger’s last year in GB saw him be successful with Christian Watson. Even Doubs had good games with Rodgers. 

agree on williams not being dependable. Maybe my memory is bad but I remember Rodgers basically complaining about his rookie WR the whole time, even though they had 1 or 2 good games (they all bloomed last year when Rodgers left in year 2). He didn't seem happy about it

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bitonti said:

there's a ton of great prospects right now but they'd have to get to the top of the round for the Ladd/Roman types - the guys who really could make a run at Williams/Lazard reps.  it would take a future pick probably. 

not saying it's impossible it just doesn't feel like a dire need is all I'm saying 

it's hard for me to imagine a scenario where the Jets draft a WR today and that guy gets real playing time this year and soaks up targets from Aaron  

 

For debating sake let’s say they’re in the 23rd pick in the 2nd round and at least one of franklin, Roman wilson or Corley is there.  Can one of these guys contribute this season, with mike williams recovering from an acl tear and Lazard’s level of commitment a big ?  Maybe.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the needs should be WR, C/G, RB, S, ILB in that order

with that said  - if there is better prospect C/G than WR where they pick they sh do BPA

 

I think RB and S could be brought in later for sure and even in the UDFA

 

also I expect them to use that 7th rounder to secure a camp ARM QB for possible practice squad duty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Augustiniak said:

For debating sake let’s say they’re in the 23rd pick in the 2nd round and at least one of franklin, Roman wilson or Corley is there.  Can one of these guys contribute this season, with mike williams recovering from an acl tear and Lazard’s level of commitment a big ?  Maybe.  

Look, I'd be real happy if it played out that way, especially Roman Wilson, but in my heart of hearts RB2 or LB/S at 72 gets more playing time this year than WR4/5

side note Lazard isn't unmotivated he's just a body catcher who Zach was throwing balls at 60 mph and he got disgruntled. The dude has a history of playing well with Rodgers. I just don't know if a rookie can pick up on all the Rodgers audibles and nuances quick enough to help right away 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Integrity28 said:

I wouldn’t be mad at this

 

IMG_4494.jpeg

This is great and better than I just did.   I had Roman Wilson available at 72, but based on my mock all the WRS and S go before the Fourth Round.  Zinter also lingers and would be a good pick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Integrity28 said:

Primary needs: WR, TE, S

Secondary needs: QB, RB, DL

WR is the only glaring need that will necessitate a 2nd or 3rd round pick. Ideally we trade up to get a top-15 WR prospect, but we may be okay at 72.

TE, RB and S are positions where you can find excellent prospects later in the draft relative to the quality of the prospects at other positions… purely because of positional valuation. I think we can absolutely get a thumper to complement Breece and Izzy in 4th or 5th. I can also see us adding to the TE and S rooms in the same range. 

All this to say, I think we’re fortunate that when our picks are happen to align pretty well with the parts of the draft where value meets our specific needs.

It should be a fun couple of days seeing how they finish.

Im not sure why TE is listed as primary need, we have conklin who is probably best te we have had in forever. We just drafted a couple guys the last two years that really tall kid who rodgers connected with and worked wiht alot at the end of last season, and ruckert. So i dont think we need to draft a TE at all, let along list him as a primary or secondary need. 

WR agreed 100 percent. And you are right abotu the positional value. It does line up nicely wiht our available picks. 

I noticed you put QB in there, and I generally agree we should have some project qb, especially wiht the rule change that gives us the free roster spot. Tyrod is find for back up but i love to take with one of those late picks some purdy type of kid, good numbers, maybe not the biggest school or jump off the tape ability that gets drafted in round 1, but just a solid guy that can run a system, that has a good head on his shoulder and makes good decisions. Im not sure what type of guys are out there, not sure it matter. Just get someone late and let him try to improve. 

We might get the next hasselback or wahtever...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...