David Harris Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 11 minutes ago, Maynard13 said: All those 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th round picks aint doing squat to move up to mid round 2. JD will have to give up #72 and a 3rd next year and a 4th (129) this year to get into round 2. Take Corely then thereafter go get Pratt. Pratt in early round 4 with the other 4th. We dont need another TE or safety. Davis was resigned. We are set there. We'd still have 134, 157 and 256 to pick up OL depth and another sleeper WR like Ryan Flourney. Corely round 3 - #72, next year's 3rd, and this years 4th #129 Round 4 #111 QB Pratt At 134, 157, 256 you look to find depth on the OL and grab another WR. Guard Robinson, Guard Zinter, Tackle Greenfiled, WR Cowing, WR Mcaffrey, Tackle Christian Jones,Tackle Javon Foster, WR Flourney Agreed. The free 4th and 5th rounder are nice but don't really allow us to get high into the 2nd. If we package our 3rd, 4th and 4th we can only slide up to back end of round 2. Maybe jump from 72 to around 56. I think these wideouts are going to get scooped up, hoping a good one slides. Our roster is pretty stacked, no way we end up keeping all these Day 3 picks. RD1 RD2 RD3 RD4 RD5 RD6 RD7 PK/TM PK/TM PK/TM PK/TM PK/TM PK/TM PK/TM 1 CHI 3000 33 BUF 580 65 CAR 265 101 CAR 96 136 DEN 38 177 MIN 20.6 221 BUF 3 2 WAS 2600 34 NE 560 66 ARI 260 102 SEA 92 137 NE 37.5 178 PIT 20.2 222 WAS 2.6 3 NE 2200 35 ARI 550 67 WAS 255 103 NE 88 138 ARI 37 179 SEA 19.8 223 LV 2.3 4 ARI 1800 36 WAS 540 68 NE 250 104 ARI 86 139 WAS 36.5 180 NE 19.4 224 CIN 2 5 LAC 1700 37 LAC 530 69 LAC 245 105 LAC 84 140 LAC 36 181 LAC 19 225 LAC 1.8 6 NYG 1600 38 TEN 520 70 NYG 240 106 TEN 82 141 BUF 35.5 182 TEN 18.6 226 ARI 1.6 7 TEN 1500 39 CAR 510 71 ARI 235 107 NYG 80 142 CAR 35 183 NYG 18.2 227 CLE 1.4 8 ATL 1400 40 WAS 500 72 NYJ 230 108 MIN 78 143 ATL 34.5 184 MIA 17.8 228 BAL 1.2 9 CHI 1350 41 GB 490 73 DAL 225 109 ATL 76 144 BUF 34 185 NYJ 17.4 229 LV 1 10 MIN 1300 42 HOU 480 74 ATL 220 110 LAC 74 145 DEN 33.5 186 ARI 17 230 MIN 1 11 NYJ 1250 43 ATL 470 75 CHI 215 111 NYJ 72 146 TEN 33 187 ATL 16.6 231 NE 1 12 DEN 1200 44 LV 460 76 DEN 210 112 LV 70 147 DEN 32.6 188 HOU 16.2 232 MIN 1 13 LV 1150 45 NO 450 77 LV 205 113 BAL 68 148 LV 32.3 189 HOU 15.8 233 DAL 1 14 NO 1100 46 IND 440 78 WAS 200 114 JAX 66 149 CIN 31.8 190 NO 15.4 234 IND 1 15 IND 1050 47 NYG 430 79 ATL 195 115 CIN 64 150 NO 31.4 191 IND 15 235 SEA 1 16 SEA 1000 48 JAX 420 80 CIN 190 116 JAX 62 151 IND 31 192 SEA 14.6 236 JAX 1 17 MIN 950 49 CIN 410 81 SEA 185 117 IND 60 152 WAS 30.6 193 NE 14.2 237 CIN 1 18 CIN 900 50 PHI 400 82 IND 180 118 SEA 58 153 JAX 30.2 194 CIN 13.8 238 HOU 1 19 LAR 875 51 PIT 390 83 LAR 175 119 PIT 56 154 LAR 29.8 195 PIT 13.4 239 NO 1 20 PIT 850 52 LAR 380 84 PIT 170 120 PHI 54 155 LAR 29.4 196 LAR 13 240 CAR 1 21 MIA 800 53 PHI 370 85 CLE 165 121 DEN 52 156 CLE 29 197 ATL 12.6 241 MIA 1 22 PHI 780 54 CLE 360 86 HOU 160 122 CHI 50 157 NYJ 28.6 198 MIA 12.2 242 TEN 1 23 JAX 760 55 MIA 350 87 DAL 155 123 HOU 49 158 MIA 28.2 199 NO 11.8 243 CLE 1 24 DET 740 56 DAL 340 88 GB 150 124 SF 48 159 KC 27.8 200 CAR 11.4 244 DAL 1 25 GB 720 57 TB 330 89 TB 145 125 TB 47 160 BUF 27.4 201 DET 11 245 GB 1 26 TB 700 58 GB 320 90 ARI 140 126 GB 46 161 PHI 27 202 GB 10.6 246 TB 1 27 ARI 680 59 HOU 310 91 GB 136 127 HOU 45 162 ARI 26.6 203 MIN 10.2 247 HOU 1 28 KC 660 60 BUF 300 92 TB 132 128 BUF 44 163 BUF 26.2 204 BUF 9.8 248 KC 1 29 DAL 640 61 DET 292 93 BAL 128 129 NYJ 43 164 DET 25.8 205 DET 9.4 249 DET 1 30 BAL 620 62 BAL 284 94 SF 124 130 BAL 42 165 BAL 25.4 206 CLE 9 250 BAL 1 31 SF 600 63 SF 276 95 BUF 120 131 KC 41 166 NYG 25 207 DEN 8.6 251 SF 1 32 CAR 590 64 KC 270 96 JAX 116 132 SF 40 167 JAX 24.6 208 LV 8.2 252 TEN 1 97 CIN 112 133 KC 39.5 168 NO 24.2 209 LAR 7.8 253 LAC 1 98 PIT 108 134 NYJ 39 169 GB 23.8 210 PHI 7.4 254 LAR 1 99 LAR 104 135 SF 38.5 170 NO 23.4 211 SF 7 255 GB 1 100 WAS 100 171 PHI 23 212 JAX 6.6 256 DEN 1 172 PHI 22.6 213 LAR 6.2 257 NYJ 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alka Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 hour ago, Integrity28 said: Primary needs: WR, TE, S Secondary needs: QB, RB, DL WR is the only glaring need that will necessitate a 2nd or 3rd round pick. Ideally we trade up to get a top-15 WR prospect, but we may be okay at 72. TE, RB and S are positions where you can find excellent prospects later in the draft relative to the quality of the prospects at other positions… purely because of positional valuation. I think we can absolutely get a thumper to complement Breece and Izzy in 4th or 5th. I can also see us adding to the TE and S rooms in the same range. All this to say, I think we’re fortunate that when our picks are happen to align pretty well with the parts of the draft where value meets our specific needs. It should be a fun couple of days seeing how they finish. Listen, I agree with almost everything on your post. The problem I have, is that some "experts" seem to think that we need to upgrade our TE position. Bullsh*t! Why? Because all the brilliant minds made the dumb prediction that the Jets were 100% going to draft Brock Bowers, so in order to justify their belief, they said that the Jets were in need of a TE. Again, Bullsh*t! Remember this analogy: "When all you have in your tool box is a hammer, then everything looks like a nail!" Conklin had his best season as an NFL pro last year, and he is only 28 years old. The braintrust on the Jets also believe that Ruckert will be a future star. I don't care whether you believe it or not, but they have said it repeatedly, and well as Leger Douzable, who focuses on the Jets primarily. I correctly predicted, rather emotionally, over and over again, that the Jets would no way draft Brock Bowers at #10. I will make the next prediction right now: The Jets will not be drafting a TE in this entire draft. Okay? This is annoying to me. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIJetsFan Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 This is the guy I hope drops way too far so we can draft and stash him on IR: Florida State QB Jordan Travis recovery from leg injury 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maynard13 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 37 minutes ago, Alka said: Listen, I agree with almost everything on your post. The problem I have, is that some "experts" seem to think that we need to upgrade our TE position. Bullsh*t! Why? Because all the brilliant minds made the dumb prediction that the Jets were 100% going to draft Brock Bowers, so in order to justify their belief, they said that the Jets were in need of a TE. Again, Bullsh*t! Remember this analogy: "When all you have in your tool box is a hammer, then everything looks like a nail!" Conklin had his best season as an NFL pro last year, and he is only 28 years old. The braintrust on the Jets also believe that Ruckert will be a future star. I don't care whether you believe it or not, but they have said it repeatedly, and well as Leger Douzable, who focuses on the Jets primarily. I correctly predicted, rather emotionally, over and over again, that the Jets would no way draft Brock Bowers at #10. I will make the next prediction right now: The Jets will not be drafting a TE in this entire draft. Okay? This is annoying to me. The prevailing word in this thread is Bullsheet. TE ? Bullsheet. RB? Bullsheet. DL Bullsheet. Safety? Bullsheet. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derp Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 I think the roster is well set up to just draft players they like. Agree the need/position value thing lines up pretty well. Wide receiver - they could move up for someone they love. There are a couple guys I like. Think you could argue there's a better shot of hitting if they take two than pick one and with the pieces behind Wilson and Williams being Lazard, Gipson, Brownlee, and Charles I think they could use a little infusion of depth and talent. Could easily add and roster developmental QB3, RB3, iOL. They could also definitely fit an edge. Safety wouldn't be that hard to fit either. And they absolutely could use long-term pieces at DT and LB if there's someone they like. A sneaky big long-term need unless they extend guys, Sauce is the only corner they have signed for next year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Rogers Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 hour ago, Guilhermezmc said: I think we're set at TE, they got Yeboah back and have Kuntz the PS guy. RB2 LB and DT are much bigger needs I'm not sure I agree. Conklin is our clear cut best guy and he's in the final year of his deal. After that it's a lot of question marks, besides Ruckert looking like a good blocker / functional TE2. Even if the Jets extend Conklin, a new TE wouldn't hurt as a development project. I would group TE is a low priority move - I won't be upset if the Jets don't draft one, but I agree with tegrity's take that a 5th-7th rounder could help us in the future. Of course, if we use multiple picks to move up, TE will quickly fall off the priority list behind RB, S, QB, etc 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymation Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 There isn't a TE worth taking for the rest of the draft. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 hours ago, Integrity28 said: Primary needs: WR, TE, S Secondary needs: QB, RB, DL WR is the only glaring need that will necessitate a 2nd or 3rd round pick. Ideally we trade up to get a top-15 WR prospect, but we may be okay at 72. TE, RB and S are positions where you can find excellent prospects later in the draft relative to the quality of the prospects at other positions… purely because of positional valuation. I think we can absolutely get a thumper to complement Breece and Izzy in 4th or 5th. I can also see us adding to the TE and S rooms in the same range. All this to say, I think we’re fortunate that when our picks are happen to align pretty well with the parts of the draft where value meets our specific needs. It should be a fun couple of days seeing how they finish. 40 Picks until Jets are OTC. I'd be pouring over the Big Board making my best guesses on other team needs... If I'm JD, once I'm in the mid-40's I start calling teams in the mid-50's to see if they bare looking to deal. Can't be shy tonight. Being aggressive has worked for him recently... keep the mojo going and get your guy. @Beerfish could conceivably go 2/2 on Jets picks. That would be quite the coup! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section314 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 hours ago, Joe W. Namath said: There is 0 need for a tight end. We have 2 really good ones, one pretty good one and one with huge upside. Might be one of the deepest tight end rooms in the nfl. It was the reason Brock Bowers wasnt even on our board. This isnt difficult folks. The Jets are trading back in to the 2nd round and taking a stud receiver. Book it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I really think AR is going to use Lazard more in a TE role than a traditional WR role.Wilson, Williams and day two pick will be the 3 primary WR’s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maynard13 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 hour ago, LIJetsFan said: This is the guy I hope drops way too far so we can draft and stash him on IR: Florida State QB Jordan Travis recovery from leg injury I saw clips of this kid play. Just sick. He has really good skills and Florida State played lights out in 2023. Compared him to Zach Wilson, who went #2, this kid may not even be drafted until round 5 or 6 or even 7. How is that even possible? Yea he was inured and suffefred a broken leg but he's out of his boot from his injury and recovering well. He's just making defenders look silly out there. He has Lamar Jackson vibes written all over him! I'm with you on taking him! 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomebodytoAnybody47 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Really hope we’re able to grab Travis or Pratt. Would be huge. 17 minutes ago, Maynard13 said: I saw clips of this kid play. Just sick. He has really good skills and Florida State played lights out in 2023. Compared him to Zach Wilson, who went #2, this kid may not even be drafted until round 5 or 6 or even 7. How is that even possible? Yea he was inured and suffefred a broken leg but he's out of his boot from his injury and recovering well. He's just making defenders look silly out there. He has Lamar Jackson vibes written all over him! I'm with you on taking him! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 3 hours ago, Guilhermezmc said: Kuntz sure, i just don't think they will cut yeboah just after extending him but what do i know right Eh, you’re probably right, but whatever… cut him anyway so his truthers pee themselves. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 2 hours ago, Alka said: Listen, I agree with almost everything on your post. The problem I have, is that some "experts" seem to think that we need to upgrade our TE position. Bullsh*t! Why? Because all the brilliant minds made the dumb prediction that the Jets were 100% going to draft Brock Bowers, so in order to justify their belief, they said that the Jets were in need of a TE. Again, Bullsh*t! Remember this analogy: "When all you have in your tool box is a hammer, then everything looks like a nail!" Conklin had his best season as an NFL pro last year, and he is only 28 years old. The braintrust on the Jets also believe that Ruckert will be a future star. I don't care whether you believe it or not, but they have said it repeatedly, and well as Leger Douzable, who focuses on the Jets primarily. I correctly predicted, rather emotionally, over and over again, that the Jets would no way draft Brock Bowers at #10. I will make the next prediction right now: The Jets will not be drafting a TE in this entire draft. Okay? This is annoying to me. I’m not an expert. Those are the needs I believe we have. I have no confidence in Yeboah or Kuntz and think it makes sense to have a full TE room. I’m not saying “upgrade”. I don’t expect a 3rd-5th rounder to suddenly put Conklin and Ruck on the bench. I think we need a viable 3rd TE, same as I don’t expect the WR we need to bench Mike or Garrett, or the S to start right away. I just see these as shallow parts of our roster that benefit from investment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted April 26 Author Share Posted April 26 I wouldn’t be mad at this 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYJCAP2 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 hours ago, slats said: Agree completely that TE is not a need. I’d like to see them use two of their remaining seven picks on WRs; their third rounder and one more in the fourth. A RB wouldn’t bother me, either, preferably a thumper. Would you lose it if they didn’t take a WR at 72 and then double dipped in the 4th? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYJCAP2 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 5 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: I wouldn’t be mad at this I agree that there may be a really good player available at 72, that isn't a WR. I’d be OK with that as long as they take 2 WR in the 4th. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, NYJCAP2 said: Would you lose it if they didn’t take a WR at 72 and then double dipped in the 4th? I could see that, going defense today. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYJCAP2 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: I could see that, going defense today. If Nubin, Fiske, or Jenkins are there at 72… I’m in. Then go get slot WRs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tranquilo Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 50 minutes ago, Maynard13 said: I saw clips of this kid play. Just sick. He has really good skills and Florida State played lights out in 2023. Compared him to Zach Wilson, who went #2, this kid may not even be drafted until round 5 or 6 or even 7. How is that even possible? Yea he was inured and suffefred a broken leg but he's out of his boot from his injury and recovering well. He's just making defenders look silly out there. He has Lamar Jackson vibes written all over him! I'm with you on taking him! All good points, but will Rodgers be okay with the team drafting a QB named Jordan? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 7 minutes ago, NYJCAP2 said: I agree that there may be a really good player available at 72, that isn't a WR. I’d be OK with that as long as they take 2 WR in the 4th. The fans all want WR, but what would that even look like in 2024? That guy plays WR4/5 behind Wilson, Williams, Lazard, and maybe Gipson. It's one thing to draft Rome/Bowers and say that pick is going to be WR2/3, but at a certain point, these guys become developmental, and the Jets still really aren't making Developmental picks right now. Rodgers' hand signals and whatnot are not rookie WR-friendly. And the team already has a KR/PR so that usual rookie job is taken. side note: Olu's gonna play a lot. Like 6-8 starts. Maybe the whole year. The fans don't want to consider this outcome, but it's pretty likely Bring on a Kris Jenkins at 72 or BPA whoever that is. If it's a WR, that's awesome too. I just don't see it as a huge need atm right now the roster needs are RB2, QB3 (do teams even do that anymore?) DT3, safety and maybe a CJ Mosely replacement 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guilhermezmc Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 Twitter is saying that the Jets really like Troy Franklin, don't know how hard will it be to get him, maybe its out of reach if he doesn't falls a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 9 minutes ago, NYJCAP2 said: Would you lose it if they didn’t take a WR at 72 and then double dipped in the 4th? I’d somewhat lose it tonight and then regain my composure tomorrow. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tranquilo Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, bitonti said: The fans all want WR but what would that even look like in 2024? that guy plays WR4/5 behind Wilson, Williams, Lazard, and maybe Gipson? It's one thing to draft Rome/Bowers and say that guys going to be WR2/3 but at a certain point these guys become developmental and the Jets still really aren't making Developmental picks right now. Rodger's hand signals and whatnot are not rookie WR friendly. And the team already has a KR/PR so that usual rookie job is taken. side note Olu's gonna play a lot. Like 6-8 starts. Maybe the whole year. The fans don't want to consider this outcome, but it's pretty likely so yes Bring on a Kris Jenkins at 72 or BPA whoever that is. If it's a WR that's awesome too. I just don't see it as a huge need atm right now the honest needs are RB2, safety and maybe a CJ Mosely replacement Mike Williams isn’t dependable, health wise so we need the depth. If the receiver is good, he will be fine. Rodger’s last year in GB saw him be successful with Christian Watson. Even Doubs had good games with Rodgers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, bitonti said: The fans all want WR but what would that even look like in 2024? that guy plays WR4/5 behind Wilson, Williams, Lazard, and maybe Gipson? It's one thing to draft Rome/Bowers and say that guys going to be WR2/3 but at a certain point these guys become developmental and the Jets still really aren't making Developmental picks right now. Rodger's hand signals and whatnot are not rookie WR friendly. And the team already has a KR/PR so that usual rookie job is taken. side note Olu's gonna play a lot. Like 6-8 starts. Maybe the whole year. The fans don't want to consider this outcome, but it's pretty likely so yes Bring on a Kris Jenkins at 72 or BPA whoever that is. If it's a WR that's awesome too. I just don't see it as a huge need atm right now the honest needs are RB2, QB3 (do teams even do that anymore?) DT3, safety and maybe a CJ Mosely replacement If the jets decided they want a legit #2 wr they can trade into the mid 2nd round and take a guy they really like. If not they can sit where they are and then decide if it’s worth taking a wr in the early 3rd knowing they have 3 picks in the 4th round, or go with their favorite DT or S and then draft wr depth on day 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alka Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 18 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: I’m not an expert. Those are the needs I believe we have. I have no confidence in Yeboah or Kuntz and think it makes sense to have a full TE room. I’m not saying “upgrade”. I don’t expect a 3rd-5th rounder to suddenly put Conklin and Ruck on the bench. I think we need a viable 3rd TE, same as I don’t expect the WR we need to bench Mike or Garrett, or the S to start right away. I just see these as shallow parts of our roster that benefit from investment. I think the most important part of your post is, that you have no confidence in Yeboah or Kuntz. The question is: "What does JD and scouts think of these 2 guys?" Both are athletic freaks of nature. The second question is: "Is the TE that we are picking up in the later rounds, a better prospect then the the guys we currently have on the roster?" Anyone that we draft in the later rounds will be a lower tier draft pick than Brock Bowers. Will the player they are looking at grade better than Yeboah or Kuntz? I will answer the question for you. The answer is no. This is why the Jets will not draft one this year. And by the way, either Yeboah or Kuntz, I forget who, was a free agent this offseason, and the Jets chose to sign them to a new contract to stay on the team. That would indicate to me, that they have confidence in these guys going forward, to continue to try to develop them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 hours ago, rayzor said: are you guys willing to trade our 3rd and three 4's to get to the bottom 3rd of the 2nd? That's what it will cost according to the value chart which was pretty accurate with the Vikings trade. The better option might be to trade next year's picks to get a WR to contribute this year but that might shorten the list of teams willing to do so. With our needs, it might be better to stay put and let the chips fall. Chart-wise just the early 4th alone, or both of our lower 4ths while keeping pick #111, gets them to picks 59-60 (depending how willing a team is to move down). That's roughly (the middle of) the bottom 1/3 of the 2nd round, no? Yes they could trade a pick from next year's draft, which would probably be our 3rd rounder next year (paired with our 3rd rounder this year), instead of the earliest of our three picks in the 4th. I think they'd choose a 4th (or a pair of 4ths) this year while we're holding 3 of them instead of our 3rd rounder next season. Could also depend what wiggle room Douglas, presumably from his hot seat, has in trading next season's day 1 or 2 draft picks away. Depends which WR has lasted to what pick before deciding to move up, if there's a guy they're so focused on getting, which I guess is how it should be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet_Engine1 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 4 hours ago, Integrity28 said: It should be a fun couple of days seeing how they finish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 2 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: If the jets decided they want a legit #2 wr they can trade into the mid 2nd round and take a guy they really like. If not they can sit where they are and then decide if it’s worth taking a wr in the early 3rd knowing they have 3 picks in the 4th round, or go with their favorite DT or S and then draft wr depth on day 3 there's a ton of great prospects right now but they'd have to get to the top of the round for the Ladd/Roman types - the guys who really could make a run at Williams/Lazard reps. it would take a future pick probably. not saying it's impossible it just doesn't feel like a dire need is all I'm saying it's hard for me to imagine a scenario where the Jets draft a WR today and that guy gets real playing time this year and soaks up targets from Aaron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet_Engine1 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 5 minutes ago, Alka said: I think the most important part of your post is, that you have no confidence in Yeboah or Kuntz. The question is: "What does JD and scouts think of these 2 guys?" Both are athletic freaks of nature. The second question is: "Is the TE that we are picking up in the later rounds, a better prospect then the the guys we currently have on the roster?" Anyone that we draft in the later rounds will be a lower tier draft pick than Brock Bowers. Will the player they are looking at grade better than Yeboah or Kuntz? I will answer the question for you. The answer is no. This is why the Jets will not draft one this year. And by the way, either Yeboah or Kuntz, I forget who, was a free agent this offseason, and the Jets chose to sign them to a new contract to stay on the team. That would indicate to me, that they have confidence in these guys going forward, to continue to try to develop them. Yeboah got a new deal to keep him around. Hes a core special teamer, though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 8 minutes ago, Tranquilo said: Mike Williams isn’t dependable, health wise so we need the depth. If the receiver is good, he will be fine. Rodger’s last year in GB saw him be successful with Christian Watson. Even Doubs had good games with Rodgers. agree on williams not being dependable. Maybe my memory is bad but I remember Rodgers basically complaining about his rookie WR the whole time, even though they had 1 or 2 good games (they all bloomed last year when Rodgers left in year 2). He didn't seem happy about it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 1 minute ago, bitonti said: there's a ton of great prospects right now but they'd have to get to the top of the round for the Ladd/Roman types - the guys who really could make a run at Williams/Lazard reps. it would take a future pick probably. not saying it's impossible it just doesn't feel like a dire need is all I'm saying it's hard for me to imagine a scenario where the Jets draft a WR today and that guy gets real playing time this year and soaks up targets from Aaron For debating sake let’s say they’re in the 23rd pick in the 2nd round and at least one of franklin, Roman wilson or Corley is there. Can one of these guys contribute this season, with mike williams recovering from an acl tear and Lazard’s level of commitment a big ? Maybe. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SickJetFan Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 I think the needs should be WR, C/G, RB, S, ILB in that order with that said - if there is better prospect C/G than WR where they pick they sh do BPA I think RB and S could be brought in later for sure and even in the UDFA also I expect them to use that 7th rounder to secure a camp ARM QB for possible practice squad duty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 3 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: For debating sake let’s say they’re in the 23rd pick in the 2nd round and at least one of franklin, Roman wilson or Corley is there. Can one of these guys contribute this season, with mike williams recovering from an acl tear and Lazard’s level of commitment a big ? Maybe. Look, I'd be real happy if it played out that way, especially Roman Wilson, but in my heart of hearts RB2 or LB/S at 72 gets more playing time this year than WR4/5 side note Lazard isn't unmotivated he's just a body catcher who Zach was throwing balls at 60 mph and he got disgruntled. The dude has a history of playing well with Rodgers. I just don't know if a rookie can pick up on all the Rodgers audibles and nuances quick enough to help right away Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 32 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: I wouldn’t be mad at this This is great and better than I just did. I had Roman Wilson available at 72, but based on my mock all the WRS and S go before the Fourth Round. Zinter also lingers and would be a good pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornJetsFan1983 Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 4 hours ago, Integrity28 said: Primary needs: WR, TE, S Secondary needs: QB, RB, DL WR is the only glaring need that will necessitate a 2nd or 3rd round pick. Ideally we trade up to get a top-15 WR prospect, but we may be okay at 72. TE, RB and S are positions where you can find excellent prospects later in the draft relative to the quality of the prospects at other positions… purely because of positional valuation. I think we can absolutely get a thumper to complement Breece and Izzy in 4th or 5th. I can also see us adding to the TE and S rooms in the same range. All this to say, I think we’re fortunate that when our picks are happen to align pretty well with the parts of the draft where value meets our specific needs. It should be a fun couple of days seeing how they finish. Im not sure why TE is listed as primary need, we have conklin who is probably best te we have had in forever. We just drafted a couple guys the last two years that really tall kid who rodgers connected with and worked wiht alot at the end of last season, and ruckert. So i dont think we need to draft a TE at all, let along list him as a primary or secondary need. WR agreed 100 percent. And you are right abotu the positional value. It does line up nicely wiht our available picks. I noticed you put QB in there, and I generally agree we should have some project qb, especially wiht the rule change that gives us the free roster spot. Tyrod is find for back up but i love to take with one of those late picks some purdy type of kid, good numbers, maybe not the biggest school or jump off the tape ability that gets drafted in round 1, but just a solid guy that can run a system, that has a good head on his shoulder and makes good decisions. Im not sure what type of guys are out there, not sure it matter. Just get someone late and let him try to improve. We might get the next hasselback or wahtever... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.