MDL_JET Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, dbatesman said: 1. CLE: Darnold 2. NYG: Chubb 3. NYJ: Allen We riot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prime21 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: If they want more draft picks in favor of guys not a part of the future, then the move is to trade Eli, not the #2 overall pick they're going to use on team's next QB through the 2031 season. They wont trade Eli. Although he is declining I don't think they want to take another PR hit. HE can groom the next guy if they select a QB. If not then Webb will continue to learn from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsplayer21 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 15 minutes ago, T0mShane said: Possible. Doubt they turn down a desperate haul bills are rumored to give. They can still get a very good player like Davenport at 12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycdan Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 You've got to hand it to them for palming him off on another team. I hope it doesn't blow up in their faces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted March 22, 2018 Author Share Posted March 22, 2018 Just now, Beerfish said: There goes your Vernon to the jets cap dump dream scenario. It was a great idea by me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prime21 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, MDL_JET said: Or because they know Allen will be there. Possibly but Baker is really never thought of as going in the top 2 spots. The other 3 QB's have all been tied to these spots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDL_JET Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 The fact that so many people just have us passing on Rosen for Allen is terrifying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whodeawhodat Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 explosive move amirite??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted March 22, 2018 Author Share Posted March 22, 2018 6 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: If they want more draft picks in favor of guys not a part of the future, then the move is to trade Eli, not the #2 overall pick they're going to use on team's next QB through the 2031 season. What’s the cap hit on this for the team that gets him? Isn’t it like $17 mil? Asking for a friend cough Jaguars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycdan Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Just now, MDL_JET said: The fact that so many people just have us passing on Rosen for Allen is terrifying. Or more likely wishful thinking on their parts. I'll admit I'd be stunned if we did that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDL_JET Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, nycdan said: Or more likely wishful thinking on their parts. I'll admit I'd be stunned if we did that. He responded with" Mac seems to have a type". F me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpoppy717 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Don't think this means they take Chubb. To me means more likely they take QB, as indicates they are not all about win now, trading good player for picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BklynJetsFan85 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Makes sense, since giants switching to the 3-4Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munchmemory Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 21 minutes ago, UntouchableCrew said: You think? My reaction was "big blow to the Giants want to win now crowd." This sounds like waving the white flag and taking the QB. they're transitioning to a 34 where JPP has no value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoop24 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Just now, MDL_JET said: He responded with" Mac seems to have a type". F me. Rosen fits his type to a tee. If where being honest . Tall with above average arm . Baker is the one that don’t fit in the type argument Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDL_JET Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, jpoppy717 said: Don't think this means they take Chubb. To me means more likely they take QB, as indicates they are not all about win now, trading good player for picks. I think if the Giants want anyone but a QB they'll do a swap with the Jets and the Jets would do it. If no swap happens, it's a QB. Zero reason to stay at 2 if you're taking Chubb, Barkley or Nelson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 13 minutes ago, IndianaJet said: Denver is the play here...and they're gonna steal Baker from us. Charlie Weiss was on NFL Network radio this morning and has an interesting theory on why the Jets traded up.....to get Mayfield. His thought was that the Jets were comfortable moving up to 3 because they know the Browns won't take Mayfield {(1) they seem to love Darnold and (2) they can't risk Mayfield turning into Johnny Football v. 2.0} and because the Jets know the Giants won't take Mayfield because he doesn't fit the conservative Giants M.O. Hence, moving up to three because they know Baker will still be there. Baker aka doug flutie 2.0 at 3 is an insane thought. Can we stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Makes sense, since giants switching to the 3-4Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile appGood point. I totally forgot about that switch. Trade makes sense then just from that standpoint.Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbt Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 saw one mock draft where Giants trade with the Bills and then they take Marcus Davenport at 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 11 minutes ago, dbatesman said: 1. CLE: Darnold 2. NYG: Chubb 3. NYJ: Allen From what I understand Chubb is a huge reach as a 34 DE or OLB and is considered a much better fit in a 43 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Got very nervous when I saw the headline "giants trade....." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted March 22, 2018 Author Share Posted March 22, 2018 I forgot the Giants signed two edge guys in Kareem Martin and Josh Mauro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BklynJetsFan85 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Good point. I totally forgot about that switch. Trade makes sense then just from that standpoint.Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile appI still think they take Barkley with their glaring need at RB. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, Larz said: Got very nervous when I saw the headline "giants trade....." As far as Jets fans worried about the Bills trading up, FWIW all reports are that Bills are in love with Allen, and if Browns love for Darnold is true...Bills trade might just end up saving the Jets from themselves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndianaJet Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Just now, kevinc855 said: Baker aka doug flutie 2.0 at 3 is an insane thought. Can we stop. In ten years, Baker is going to be the best QB out of this draft. Can we stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 I still think they take Barkley with their glaring need at RB. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile appI agree. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycdan Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 They guys that fits a desperate need for the Giants is Nelson. But similarly to Chubb, they don't need to take him at 2. But he also won't be there at 12. Trade down w/ CLE or DEN seem to work but I don't see why either team would pay a lot to move up unless CLE wanted Barkley and thought the Giants would take him. Still...if they want Nelson, I don't see them taking a QB instead of him at 2 just because of positional value. You can choose a DE over an OG there, but you don't draft a QB unless you REALLY want a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 29 minutes ago, T0mShane said: Puts Bradley Chubb in play at #2. OR trade the pick to a QB starved team like Denver and pick Chubb at #5. Risky but it's possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obrien2Toon Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 A third seems kind of high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maury77 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 This was a pure salary dump, the Giants only had 5 million in cap space: https://overthecap.com/salary-cap/new-york-giants Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 I dont think you take one of these QBs unless you need a QB. Nelson, Barkley and Chubb have less question marks than these four QBs do.Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted March 22, 2018 Author Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, Thai Jet said: OR trade the pick to a QB starved team like Denver and pick Chubb at #5. Risky but it's possible. No doubt. No one knows what the Giants are doing right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack48 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 33 minutes ago, T0mShane said: Puts Bradley Chubb in play at #2. Yup. They want a star with that pick. But they cpuld trade to 5 with Denver and get Chubb. They may want Barkley, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTownsell1 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 1 minute ago, Sperm Edwards said: If they want more draft picks in favor of guys not a part of the future, then the move is to trade Eli, not the #2 overall pick they're going to use on team's next QB through the 2031 season. I've said for months, they can't trade Eli. He's not good and his contract is atrocious. No one wants him. This wasn't a conscious decision by the Giants. Eli was overrated when he was young, now he's just an old turn over machine. He's basically a high priced version of mccown, tyrod, mccarron, Keenum... The only question that's relevant to us is whether the giants are high on Davis Webb or willing to ride with Eli and try to build an elite team around him with guys like Barkley, Odell, engram, Shepard... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.