Would you trade the #2 and a 2nd round pick and Sam Darnold for the #10 and Dak Prescott?

[docdhc]

Make Cowboys give up a 1st rounder to take the contract and it makes sense. 

[The Crusher]

29 minutes ago, Bruce Harper said:

No way.


Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app

 

27 minutes ago, FidelioJet said:

Nope...

 

22 minutes ago, doitny said:

no

 

19 minutes ago, long time suffering Jets f said:

No thanks. I’ll pass.

 

10 minutes ago, ganggreen305 said:

Hell No.

LOL, many ways to say it. 100% 

[Dunnie]

[Charlie Brown]

Ummmmm Noooooo Darnold outplayed Dak head to head when Dak was on the better team!

Nooooooo

[Charlie Brown]

Just now, Dunnie said:

Ummm some how I look at your post and the word that I think is YES!!! Not Nooo...

But that is just me   

[Greenbloodblitz]

No.

I rate Dak Prescott in the same category as Sam Darnold, Kirk Cousins, Matty Ice, Matt Stafford , Andy Dalton and Derek Carr.

Sammy Hagar has a really good voice but he ain't no David Lee Roth!

[Ken Schroy]

2 hours ago, jetstream23 said:

Heard this idea on a local sports talk show. Seemed like an interesting way for the Cowboys to get out of the financial predicament with Dak and to choose a potential QB of the future at #2, letting Darnold start the season as starter. The Jets would be upgrading at QB, could probably afford Dak and still have a Top 10 pick.

Not sure how I feel about paying Dak a ton. He’s a better starter than Darnold with no bust/development risk but he’s no Deshaun Watson. 

No.

[rex-n-effect]

IMO Dak would be an upgrade at the position but not for $40 million and not for any sizable contract without knowing how he is going to perform on the ankle. I would consider Darnold and a mid-round pick for a very reasonable contract even if that meant escalation clauses for performance. 

[Thai Jet]

3 hours ago, jetstream23 said:

Heard this idea on a local sports talk show. Seemed like an interesting way for the Cowboys to get out of the financial predicament with Dak and to choose a potential QB of the future at #2, letting Darnold start the season as starter. The Jets would be upgrading at QB, could probably afford Dak and still have a Top 10 pick.

Not sure how I feel about paying Dak a ton. He’s a better starter than Darnold with no bust/development risk but he’s no Deshaun Watson. 

Interesting. Basically it comes down, for me, that Dak just isn't worth the money. I mean seriously what has he done to justify eating up 1/5 of the cap ? Pass

[Barry McCockinner]

Blocked and reported.

[Untouchable]

No

If you’re moving on from Darnold, then you either make a blockbuster deal for Watson or take Wilson/Fields at #2.

Dak is a good QB, but he’s not part of that elite tier and sure as hell isn’t worth $40 million a year.

And after shredding his ankle, who knows if he’ll even regain his prior form.

[Barry McCockinner]

 

[32EBoozer]

5 hours ago, johnnysd said:

Nope. People need to realize that we have a rare opportunity to take a QB at #2. There is risk, but the best way for us to truly be competitive is with an elite QB on a rookie salary. 

Just like we had that rare opportunity to trade up to number three to pick the quarterback who we are looking to trade

[Biggs]

Dak is really good.  I still like a cheap QB on a rookie deal who might be great.  Can't see Dak making us better than he made the Cowboys.  

I would love to see how we grade out the 4 QB's after Lawrence.   We might be able to trade down and pick up a really good QB and a pick.  

Take Sams draft as an example.  If you didn't fall in love with any of them you could have moved down and taken random Allen/Rosen/Jackson and had a 67% chance of getting a really good NFL QB and a 33% chance of getting a bust.   By falling in love with Baker and Sam we had a 50% of getting a decent not great QB and a 50% chance of getting a bust.  

Don't fall in love work the draft and put the QB we draft in position to be succeed if he has it in him.  There are 4 likely 1st round QB's get one of them get another pick and do what it takes to give them a chance including letting them sit for awhile. 

[JohnnyLV]

18 minutes ago, 32EBoozer said:

Just like we had that rare opportunity to trade up to number three to pick hey quarterback

Just because you fail once does not mean you should not get up and try again.

[Integrity28]

Isn’t Dak a free agent?

[chad2coles]

2 hours ago, Greenbloodblitz said:

No.

I rate Dak Prescott in the same category as Sam Darnold, Kirk Cousins, Matty Ice, Matt Stafford , Andy Dalton and Derek Carr.

Sammy Hagar has a really good voice but he ain't no David Lee Roth!

I can understand Dak, Cousins, Stafford, Carr, and even Ryan at 35 years old being in the same group (ranked somewhere between top 6 to top 15), but Sam Darnold has never had a good NFL season, and Andy Dalton averaged half the yards per game Dak did on the same team this last year.

[nycdan]

3 hours ago, Dunnie said:

I think if I put my face in just the right spot it would say "HELLO".  I'd like to try.

[C Mart]

Close this up

 

[HighPitch]

7 hours ago, Smashmouth said:

In a heartbeat ? The guy wants 4o mil a year unless you think he's the second best QB in the NFL

There was no mention of pay

[nycdan]

I am really surprised.  KC's deal with Mahomes looks like the bargain of the century now that DAL is paying Prescott the same thing.  Jerry just can't let his toys slip away.  I don't see how they will be able to afford to put enough talent around Dak to challenge for the trophy and Dak isn't Patrick in that I don't think he can carry a team that isn't loaded.  We'll see.

The side story to this is I wonder how long until Deshaun Watson realizes his shiny new contract isn't market value anymore.  I wonder if trading for him is no longer as good a deal as it was yesterday and if that will affect the trade value.

[jetophile]

I don't understand this at all. What makes Dak Prescott or the Russell Wilson "idea" (it's dumb) any different? A few shekels, of course, but that's about it. 

The Jets are not in a win now position in either scenario, with or without The Boot. "But, but, what about Watson?" It's a good thing Tannenbaum is only playing armchair GM these days.

 

[Smashmouth]

1 hour ago, HighPitch said:

There was no mention of pay

well he just got 40 mil per from Jerry world

160 over 4 years 126 guaranteed and that's before he even tested the 2 x repaired ankle.

[dcJet]

5 hours ago, Biggs said:

Take Sams draft as an example.  If you didn't fall in love with any of them you could have moved down and taken random Allen/Rosen/Jackson and had a 67% chance of getting a really good NFL QB and a 33% chance of getting a bust.   By falling in love with Baker and Sam we had a 50% of getting a decent not great QB and a 50% chance of getting a bust.  

 

Yes.  My hope is Wilson and Fields both become great so it's impossible for us to F it up.   

Unless we Macc it and trade down or take a RT.

[Philc1]

No