Jump to content

**** OFFICIAL JETS DISMANTLE THE BRONCOS GAME THREAD ****


Pac

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Vader said:

the fumble gave rodgers his excuse to ignore diva boy who talks a big game 

but it was said earlier by him that teams were playing cover 2 and taking Garrett out of the game anyway. Rodgers is already risk averse and sees the better odds throwing away from Wilson, cancelling out Surtain/CB1.

Dogsh*t excuse IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Vader said:

They'll wind up trading Wilson if they can't figure it out.

I'm sure Rodgers wants it to succeed but Wilson is potentially just not a fit. Rodgers won't cater to him either if he can make easier plays on the other side of the field versus the lesser defender so this kind of smallish, loping, wiggly-jiggledy #1WR may not be ideal ti begin with even if it could also be said that for rodgers and Wilson "not throwing to GW" is "taking Surtain out of the game", so

Oh yes, lets trade the young WR because 41 year old QB can't throw him the ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...