Joejet Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 What price would you pay to move up to #1 and would you use it to pick Carson Wentz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Two firsts(this years and next) and probably a 2nd or third depending on what year that pick is in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 No price at all, and I like Carson Wentz. We'd have to give up our 1st and 2nd along with probably our 4th. We need offensive linemen. I dont mind giving up a draft pick for a QB, but not half of our draft picks, especially for a rookie who imo shouldnt see the field this season. Spending that much doesnt mean that he must see the field, but your intentions are to spend that much then it should be for a person who is seeing the field this season. I'd rather see who we're looking at at #20. We need rookie Tackles and Centers more than we need rookie QB's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 #20 overall, Mo Wilk, and probably our 2nd round pick is probably scratching the surface on cost... but I wouldn't pay it. I don't believe good teams are built by giving away all of your assets for 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cant wait Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 If SF decides to not go QB, trading up to #7 could be a more realistic target Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 7 minutes ago, Joejet said: What price would it cost to move up to #1 Too much. Quote and would you use it to pick Carson Wentz? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 I personally think Wentz is overhyped. I think if a QB Macc like's drops he will take him.(Probably Lynch) but other than that there will be no trading up in this draft. We have too many holes and only 6 picks. I can actually see us trading down if anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 If Macc thinks either Goff or Wentz are the real deal then I'd pay the 2 #1's and them some (#2? Mo Wilk?). QB is the foundation. If we get that part right then we'll have a real chance to win going forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 If the front office where relatively sure about him I'd give them our entire draft. No big deal. We finally get a QB and I'll just pretend it's an Idzik draft where nobody other than our first rounder will be on the roster the following year anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 We can keep our picks and draft Kevin Hogan late and pick up Mike Bercovici UDRFA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sourceworx Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 4 minutes ago, SayNoToDMC said: If the front office where relatively sure about him I'd give them our entire draft. No big deal. We finally get a QB and I'll just pretend it's an Idzik draft where nobody other than our first rounder will be on the roster the following year anyway. This. If they truly believe that one of the QBs is going to be great, I'd be fine giving up whatever we had to in order to get him. When it comes to a franchise QB, there's no such thing as too expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckkieB Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 If the Jets are convinced that one of the QB's in this draft could be the answer for them, then they should do whatever it takes to make sure they land him, including trading up for the #1 pick. The Jets need to go balls out to get a franchise QB each and every time the opportunity presents itself until they get one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogglez Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 9 minutes ago, Villain The Foe said: We can keep our picks and draft Kevin Hogan late and pick up Mike Bercovici UDRFA Nah, I'm good with not taking either one of those two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 3 minutes ago, Mogglez said: Nah, I'm good with not taking either one of those two. cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 12 minutes ago, Villain The Foe said: We can keep our picks and draft Kevin Hogan late and pick up Mike Bercovici UDRFA That way we can take Geno, Petty, Hogan, Bercovici and hire a new team doctor, Dr. Frank N. Stein and have him build us a quarterback! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jett Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 You guys are all wrong. The redskins had the 6th pick, and traded 2 more first round picks and a 2nd round pick... Just for the 2nd.. Like it or not they set the value for that pick. In a draft with a bona-fide Andrew luck type prospect? Probably 3 first round picks, 2 second round picks and maybe two 4th's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 1 minute ago, CrazyCarl40 said: That way we can take Geno, Petty, Hogan, Bercovici and hire a new team doctor, Dr. Frank N. Stein and have him build us a quarterback! lol, nice. One of these days im going to hit, then I'll be able to pride myself on quarterbacks! lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 JMO people are bashing Carson Wentz in this thread because we can't actually get him. If the Jets had let's say the 4th pick in the draft, we wouldn't be sh*tting all over Carson Wentz. as for moving up it takes a ton of ammo to get to 1, with 6 picks total the Jets don't have that type of ammo right now. But other teams do for example the LA rams have 2 2nds and Case Keenum is their starter. They could package their 15th, the 2 2nds and next year's 1 to get up to the Titans pick (using the trade value chart) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe W. Namath Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 3 1sts would get it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j4jets Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Think RG3 and more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 There isn't a QB in this years draft that's worth moving to 1, and if there was, no one drafting 1st would trade that away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 58 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said: I personally think Wentz is overhyped. I think if a QB Macc like's drops he will take him.(Probably Lynch) but other than that there will be no trading up in this draft. We have too many holes and only 6 picks. I can actually see us trading down if anything. "Too many holes" should never be a reason to trade down in a draft. You don't draft for need. Draft quality players, so you won't have those holes in the future. Tannenbaum traded away picks like candy, then made awful selections with all of those picks in the post-Mangold/Brick year. Idzik had 12 picks and blew it on nearly all of them. If Macc thinks we can stick and pick and end up with a QB we like, OR that there aren't any QB's in the first round worth taking, we should stick and pick. IF he loves a QB we should move up to take him, though I can't possibly see us having the ammo to move up more than about 9 spots to do so. But trading down makes little sense. What player will be there at 20 that someone covets enough to move up? A QB that we hate but someone else loves? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 I just hope Macc doesn't trade 3 #1's for RG III Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chirorob Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 1 hour ago, SayNoToDMC said: If the front office where relatively sure about him I'd give them our entire draft. No big deal. We finally get a QB and I'll just pretend it's an Idzik draft where nobody other than our first rounder will be on the roster the following year anyway. It's not like we always had a lot of pics under Mike T. anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chirorob Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 56 minutes ago, bitonti said: JMO people are bashing Carson Wentz in this thread because we can't actually get him. If the Jets had let's say the 4th pick in the draft, we wouldn't be sh*tting all over Carson Wentz. as for moving up it takes a ton of ammo to get to 1, with 6 picks total the Jets don't have that type of ammo right now. But other teams do for example the LA rams have 2 2nds and Case Keenum is their starter. They could package their 15th, the 2 2nds and next year's 1 to get up to the Titans pick (using the trade value chart) You know, if the Titans could pull that off, they could actually be well on the way to fixing that team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 1 hour ago, ChuckkieB said: If the Jets are convinced that one of the QB's in this draft could be the answer for them, then they should do whatever it takes to make sure they land him, including trading up for the #1 pick. The Jets need to go balls out to get a franchise QB each and every time the opportunity presents itself until they get one. Agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jett Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 1 hour ago, bitonti said: JMO people are bashing Carson Wentz in this thread because we can't actually get him. If the Jets had let's say the 4th pick in the draft, we wouldn't be sh*tting all over Carson Wentz. as for moving up it takes a ton of ammo to get to 1, with 6 picks total the Jets don't have that type of ammo right now. But other teams do for example the LA rams have 2 2nds and Case Keenum is their starter. They could package their 15th, the 2 2nds and next year's 1 to get up to the Titans pick (using the trade value chart) I actually agree with you completely. I like wentz a lot and the biggest most glaring critique is he didn't play D1 but he looks great. If we had a chance to get him people would be salivating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LockeJET Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 1 hour ago, BurnleyJet said: There isn't a QB in this years draft that's worth moving to 1, and if there was, no one drafting 1st would trade that away. You're completely wrong!! The Titans just took a QB...They wouldn't take another one.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 I would've paid "almost" any price to get from #6 to #2 last year for Mariota. Moving 4 spots was possibly their best opportunity for another decade. Picking in the mediocre team teens and 20s is almost a complete waste of time without a QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 15 minutes ago, LockeJET said: You're completely wrong!! The Titans just took a QB...They wouldn't take another one.. And none are Luck, Elway, or they may trade Mariota, and keep the rook. Unfortunately it's Wentz and Goff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embrace the Suck Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Mo Wilkerson. The draft is a crap shoot. Whereas, Mo Wilkerson is a well behaved sure thing all pro. I'd throw in a pick outside the first round if I liked a guy enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 1 hour ago, RoadFan said: I would've paid "almost" any price to get from #6 to #2 last year for Mariota. Moving 4 spots was possibly their best opportunity for another decade. Picking in the mediocre team teens and 20s is almost a complete waste of time without a QB. Would you still do that? I am not a Mariota believer (wasn't then either) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Jets fan Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Jets have picked one QB in the top 10 in the last 33 years. One. Jets have not had a franchise QB in that entire time. You can't keep trying to find a franchise QB in the late rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 4 hours ago, SayNoToDMC said: If the front office where relatively sure about him I'd give them our entire draft. No big deal. We finally get a QB and I'll just pretend it's an Idzik draft where nobody other than our first rounder will be on the roster the following year anyway. Agree this QB hungry franchise needs to deliver us all a QB who can win it for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 1 hour ago, TuscanyTile2 said: Would you still do that? I am not a Mariota believer (wasn't then either) Absolutely. Mariota played with either the worst or 2nd worst (Browns) group of offensive talent in the league. He showed poise, leadership, accuracy, and the willingness to become a pocket passer on a really bad team with no running game and below average pass protection. Tennessee is trying to surround him with some pieces. You will see leaps and bounds better from him in years 2 and 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.