KRL Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Mentioned on Francessa's show today, supposedly DAL wants to jump back into the bottom of the first round and has talked to the Jets. If it goes down DAL would have to give us their #2, #3 and #6 picks based on the value chart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPitch Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 more young prospects with cheepie rookie contracts? I'm aboard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Wilkerson and the #20 for the #4. Jerry Jones can bite my sack otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no psls Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 7 minutes ago, KRL said: Mentioned on Francessa's show today, supposedly DAL wants to jump back into the bottom of the first round and has talked to the Jets. If it goes down DAL would have to give us their #2, #3 and #6 picks based on the value chart Nice picture ; Sons of Anarchy ; don't mess with August Marks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 2 minutes ago, KRL said: Mentioned on Francessa's show today, supposedly DAL wants to jump back into the bottom of the first round and has talked to the Jets. If it goes down DAL would have to give us their #2, #3 and #6 picks based on the value chart 1 minute ago, T0mShane said: Wilkerson and the #20 for the #4. Jerry Jones can bite my sack otherwise. I was thinking the same thing (not about your sack) but I think the OP is saying Dallas wants to add a late first round pick, not give up their own first round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Straw Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Just now, AFJF said: I was thinking the same thing (not about your sack) but I think the OP is saying Dallas wants to add a late first round pick, not give up their own first round pick. How about #20 for their 2016 2nd rounder and their 2017 1st rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Just now, AFJF said: I was thinking the same thing (not about your sack) but I think the OP is saying Dallas wants to add a late first round pick, not give up their own first round pick. I got that, but the only way you do that is if you get their 2017 first in exchange. If Jones has a player he wants at the end of Rd 1, you gotta hold him up for it. Dropping back into the 2nd for an extra third is crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 14 minutes ago, KRL said: Mentioned on Francessa's show today, supposedly DAL wants to jump back into the bottom of the first round and has talked to the Jets. If it goes down DAL would have to give us their #2, #3 and #6 picks based on the value chart It's essentially moving back 16 spots to get an early 3rd rounder. I would pass on this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcat Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 15 minutes ago, KRL said: Mentioned on Francessa's show today, supposedly DAL wants to jump back into the bottom of the first round and has talked to the Jets. If it goes down DAL would have to give us their #2, #3 and #6 picks based on the value chart no way unless their 2017 1st round pick is included. Without that... no deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcat Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 17 minutes ago, KRL said: Mentioned on Francessa's show today, supposedly DAL wants to jump back into the bottom of the first round and has talked to the Jets. If it goes down DAL would have to give us their #2, #3 and #6 picks based on the value chart Francessa didn't by chance let us know the source of his little rumor, did he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Francesa also reported on Friday that Dallas traded up for the #1 pick, as his source was Minko. However Minko at the time was listening to a live mock draft on NFL Radio with trades so he got confused. This actually happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 #sauces aside, trading out of the first would be a terrible idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmat321 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 What if Romo was on the table? You have to consider it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljr Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 I like the idea of Mac being open to moving either direction depending on how the action plays out on draft day ... Or even sooner, if he believes the benefit is large enough to make the move worth it . that being said , isn't a year later's pick supposed to be one round better for equal value? ... So in addition to the lower picks, I would def push for the 2017 1st rounder over the 2016 2nd rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derp Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Paxton? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcat Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 1 hour ago, jmat321 said: What if Romo was on the table? You have to consider it. Romo is always on the table Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 2 hours ago, KRL said: Mentioned on Francessa's show today, supposedly DAL wants to jump back into the bottom of the first round and has talked to the Jets. If it goes down DAL would have to give us their #2, #3 and #6 picks based on the value chart If thats true and depending on how the draft breaks this would be great. Im always a fan of trading down for the right price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtina Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 And who would they be targeting? If it's Paxton why on earth would the QB hungriest team give that up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetPotato Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 1 hour ago, Xtina said: And who would they be targeting? If it's Paxton why on earth would the QB hungriest team give that up? Jerry's gonna put his eggs in the Manziel basket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powpow Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 4 hours ago, T0mShane said: Wilkerson and the #20 for the #4. Jerry Jones can bite my sack otherwise. Jared Goff would be the pick! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powpow Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 18 minutes ago, JetPotato said: Jerry's gonna put his eggs in the Manziel basket Yea he'll take him out for a night on the town, get some hookers, candy and proclaim himself greatest GM/owner ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogglez Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 5 hours ago, AFJF said: I was thinking the same thing (not about your sack) but I think the OP is saying Dallas wants to add a late first round pick, not give up their own first round pick. If we trade out for anything less than next year's first and a pretty decent haul this year, I will have a stroke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-met57 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 1. we are in win now mode, no way we trade out 2. trading down sucks. people think its "smart" but the truth is the further down you go the sh*ttier the picks end up being in the long run. look at Bellicheck....guy has been picking in the second round forever and only won once he spent some first rounders on D and payed a lot of money for free agents Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 1. we are in win now mode, no way we trade out 2. trading down sucks. people think its "smart" but the truth is the further down you go the sh*ttier the picks end up being in the long run. look at Bellicheck....guy has been picking in the second round forever and only won once he spent some first rounders on D and payed a lot of money for free agents 1) The 4th oldest team in the NFL without a legitimate QB is not in a "win now" mode. They need as many draft picks as possible to get younger and faster. 2) BB and the Pats are near the bottom of the league in FA spending over the years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-met57 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 1) The 4th oldest team in the NFL without a legitimate QB is not in a "win now" mode. They need as many draft picks as possible to get younger and faster. 2) BB and the Pats are near the bottom of the league in FA spending over the years. Right, but they went 10 years without winning a SB until they spent money on FA's and stopped trading down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 this would make sense for the jets since i continue to believe they would take cook early 2nd round. it would be interesting to see the demand for the jets pick if teams are bidding for lynch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 25 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: this would make sense for the jets since i continue to believe they would take cook early 2nd round. it would be interesting to see the demand for the jets pick if teams are bidding for lynch. Wouldn't teams want to jump AHEAD of the Jets if Lynch were still on the board after pick #18?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 13 hours ago, Matt39 said: Francesa also reported on Friday that Dallas traded up for the #1 pick, as his source was Minko. However Minko at the time was listening to a live mock draft on NFL Radio with trades so he got confused. This actually happened. No way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 5 minutes ago, Maxman said: No way. Was pretty funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 This type of thing would happen on the draft floor, if all top 3 qbs are gone by some chance and the top lt's and pass rusher is gone the jets might be faced with the top for or 5 guys on their board being dline or 2nd tier corners or wr they may not love. Dallas might like cook better than the jets or a dlineman. Might make sense to trade down in that scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 the sad truth of the draft is there isn't much of a difference between the Jets' 20 and the Cowboys' 34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex-Rex Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 16 hours ago, KRL said: Mentioned on Francessa's show today, supposedly DAL wants to jump back into the bottom of the first round and has talked to the Jets. If it goes down DAL would have to give us their #2, #3 and #6 picks based on the value chart So, based on that Dallas would keep the fourth pick and then have the number 20 pick for 2nd, 3rd and 6th picks. F THAT. I know Mac wants more picks, but that is not a trade I would make. T0m Shane's idea of Mo and the number four for the 20 pick sounds better than fair and it helps both teams. Dallas gets the DL they need and at 20 can still add a decent player. Meanwhile the Jets would get Jared Goff or Wentz, which I would be ecstatic about. Would mean a season of losing with Geno while the two young guys develop and battle it out in 2017, but at least there might be a light at the end of this long tunnel. They could still sign Fitz back, but he would know it is basically a one year deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chirorob Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 The talk out here is that they would do it to get a running back to go with that O line. (I live in Dallas). But there hasn't been much talk about it, just some possibilities. The only thing Jerry keeps saying is that they aren't going QB with the #4 pick. Which, means.. well, nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chirorob Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 2 hours ago, Ex-Rex said: So, based on that Dallas would keep the fourth pick and then have the number 20 pick for 2nd, 3rd and 6th picks. F THAT. I know Mac wants more picks, but that is not a trade I would make. T0m Shane's idea of Mo and the number four for the 20 pick sounds better than fair and it helps both teams. Dallas gets the DL they need and at 20 can still add a decent player. Meanwhile the Jets would get Jared Goff or Wentz, which I would be ecstatic about. Would mean a season of losing with Geno while the two young guys develop and battle it out in 2017, but at least there might be a light at the end of this long tunnel. They could still sign Fitz back, but he would know it is basically a one year deal. Dallas plays a 4-3 now, so Mo isn't a great fit. I don't believe Dallas has the cap space to sign a 16 million dollar DE. They could draft someone, Bosa maybe, who might be as good as Mo in their system and cost 1/3 as much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted March 30, 2016 Share Posted March 30, 2016 On 3/28/2016 at 7:14 PM, KRL said: Mentioned on Francessa's show today, supposedly DAL wants to jump back into the bottom of the first round and has talked to the Jets. If it goes down DAL would have to give us their #2, #3 and #6 picks based on the value chart It's a no brainer the Jets should take that offer if it's true. Paxton Lynch has BUST written all over him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.