drdetroit Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 4 minutes ago, johnnysd said: Most overblown criticism ever. QBs, even elite ones, lock onto to their first read ALL of the time. Fitz did it almost exclusively last year. Single read/dumpoff. Rinse/repeat. Even Aaron Rodgers has stated he rarely goes to a third read on most plays. Seems like there is this group think that QBs have to be looking somewhere else on every play and that at the last second go back to the read when the reaiity is that there is rarely time to go through several reads during the actual play. What separates the elites, is that they know which read will likely be open before the snap so locking in on them does not lead to a lot of interceptions. You want to talk about crappy logic how about the argument that any qb can be succesful with Marshall and Decker. There's a couple available in rounds 1-2 that we would be lucky to go 4-12 with Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinstar Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 25 minutes ago, drdetroit said: Simms loved Tannehill btw So did I, and I'm not loving Lynch . I can't put my finger on it, but something about him tells me that he's a spot light kid who will get his coach fired . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Brown Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 4 hours ago, jamesr said: Could we have a middle option - make a reasonable trade, but don't give up the farm?? I'd be on board with that, but the two options above are a bit extreme. Ummmmmmmm this was the first thing I thought!! It is the either or options that folks think and post out here that makes for an off center fan base at times..... Lynch I believe probably has more upside then Petty but not enough to bet the farm on IMO so we have to make reasonable efforts to get him here not outrageous ones........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyLV Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 19 minutes ago, Tinstar said: So did I, and I'm not loving Lynch . I can't put my finger on it, but something about him tells me that he's a spot light kid who will get his coach fired . See i actually get the other impression from him. I think he is a guy that in his own way will put the entire team on his back and raise the level of the entire team. I think that Lynch is going to be an elite QB in the NFL. And he is perfect for NY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradis Posted April 24, 2016 Author Share Posted April 24, 2016 4 hours ago, Maxman said: I personally would love it if they drafted him and I support moving up to get him. But I voted not because the way this is worded: Are you prepared to do whatever it takes to land Lynch? Yes - trade picks, Mo, whatever... just get us the franchise QB I am not giving up Mo and next years first rounder to get him. So we will see how the draft board plays out. to that i would say this.... Let's say we don't want to give up next year's first. TB says sure, we'll take Mo, #20, and next year's #1, and in return you get #9, and our 3rd round pick... You say no.... Then he proceeds to be drafted by Buffalo who did settle on paying for him, and he's winning division titles and making championship runs... you think in 3-4 years, we're gonna really care about giving up a 1st, when you're making AFC title runs annually? If you're not prepared to give up next year's first, then you just don't love him that much. And in that case, shouldn't even thinking about going up for him. All i'm saying is - If he's the guy, then he's the guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinstar Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 4 minutes ago, Paradis said: to that i would say this.... Let's say we don't want to give up next year's first. TB says sure, we'll take move, #20, and next year's #1, and in return you get #9, and our 3rd pick... You say no.... Then he proceeds to be drafted by Buffalo who did settle on paying for him, and he's winning division titles and making championship runs... you think in 4 years, we're gonna really care about giving up a 1st, when you're playing for AFC championship title vs IND 3 years from now? If you're not prepared to give up next year's first, then you just don't love him that much. And in that case, shouldn't even thinking about going up for him. All i'm saying is - If he's the guy, then he's the guy. I agree with this logic, but I just don't think he's the guy. If Money Mac thinks he's the guy, then he should go get him . I don't, so I say leave him be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSfaninNE Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 The 70% is eye opening and really does make you think if the Jets go get him, Gailey can start him immediately and he won't crumble under pressure. Obviously don't force him out there, give him a year if needs it but damn it is enticing and I did watch a bunch on him today. I'm pretty much in! I voted yes but not absurd crap like the next 2 1sts to get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 On behalf of Villain, where's the option "3rd for Glennon" Option? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 Is Paradis "pounding the table"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSfaninNE Posted April 24, 2016 Share Posted April 24, 2016 2 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: Is Paradis "pounding the table"? He's certainly making his case in the War Room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 1 hour ago, Paradis said: That's a load sh*t and completely inaccurate. It's kind of like when you made fun of his Proday performance, BEFORE he had a proday. A little off topic, but just an FYI. Neither Detroit nor I are opposed to trading up for a QB. Last year, Detroit would've moved up for Jameis and me for Marcus. I would've supported a deal to go get Wentz or Goff. Neither of us would select Lynch at #20 if he is there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradis Posted April 25, 2016 Author Share Posted April 25, 2016 14 minutes ago, Integrity28 said: Is Paradis "pounding the table"? like happy-hour in a whore house my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetrider Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 1 hour ago, Tinstar said: So did I, and I'm not loving Lynch . I can't put my finger on it, but something about him tells me that he's a spot light kid who will get his coach fired . A spotlight kid on the Jets? Never ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradis Posted April 25, 2016 Author Share Posted April 25, 2016 1 minute ago, RoadFan said: A little off topic, but just an FYI. Neither Detroit nor I are opposed to trading up for a QB. Last year, Detroit would've moved up for Jameis and me for Marcus. I would've supported a deal to go get Wentz or Goff. Neither of us would select Lynch at #20 if he is there. and that's OK... If you genuinely don't like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaq218 Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Aside from his ridiculous arm talent I do not see how Lynch is a better prospect than Petty. I would prefer taking a chance on Hackenberg in the 3rd or 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 1 hour ago, Tinstar said: So did I, and I'm not loving Lynch . I can't put my finger on it, but something about him tells me that he's a spot light kid who will get his coach fired . He's going to end up getting multiple coaches fired the way the hype is going Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BklynJetsFan85 Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Do not think we should trade the house... if we trade mo to move up and keep our 20 - i would be happy with that, if Lynch is there at 20 and we take him - im also fine with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYJCAP2 Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 No way would I ever trade up to get this guy. If he is there at 20, perhaps, but he needs atleast a year or 2 on the bench. This guy is not Goff or Wentz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 He's the only guy I'd accept trading up for, although going into the top 10For him would probably be tol much. That's a good stat and I think we could be an ideal fit for him. Although I would point out that Fitz was very good under pressure too. For the haters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 9 minutes ago, Irish Jet said: He's the only guy I'd accept trading up for, although going into the top 10For him would probably be tol much. That's a good stat and I think we could be an ideal fit for him. Although I would point out that Fitz was very good under pressure too. For the haters. If he is there at 10 there is a very good possibility he will be there when the Bills pick. Just have to get in front of them, so the trade up might not cost an arm and a leg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 7 minutes ago, Maxman said: If he is there at 10 there is a very good possibility he will be there when the Bills pick. Just have to get in front of them, so the trade up might not cost an arm and a leg. That would be the dumbest move ever by the bills. They can give me Tyrod Taylor if they draft that bust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detectivekimble Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 8 hours ago, Paradis said: I realize this topic has been pounded like a brothel in port-town (on wing night), but the Lynch sweepstakes officially kick off tomorrow morning, and I can't stress how many times i've pointed to this (and other similar qualities) about this dude... Despite beating those other two guys in virtually every meaningful category, you people still are "wary" of drafting the guy with:-the least turnovers-better completion %-better under pressure-better athlete-better arm talent-better decision maker-better size and strength-better improvement during college-better fit for our offense ...but that internet man....it says he's so raw... he's just... i mean....he's so raw. FINAL THOUGHTS: Yes or no... are you on board or not... no fish please. can't flip flop about "only under these conditions"... you're either in or you're out. Sounds familiar. Poise in the Pocket Smith completed 70.8 percent of his passes when opponents sent five or more pass rushers last season, the highest completion percentage against the blitz of Scouts Inc.’s top eight QB prospects. Passing vs Blitz Final College Season Smith was able to exploit blitzing defenses in much the same way that Robert Griffin III did in his final season of college. Griffin III went on to lead the NFL with a 96.8 Total QBR against the blitz. Further, Smith was sacked 19 times in 571 dropbacks last season. He was able to scramble for 253 yards when forced out of the pocket as well as complete 49.5 percent of his passes when under duress (avg FBS quarterback completed only 40 percent). http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/63943/what-proscons-come-with-geno-smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redlichtie Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 11 hours ago, johnnysd said: It would seem that Gailey's offense is the most rookie friendly offense in the NFL. Last year we ran a 80% shotgun single read offense. Even Lynch can learn that. Go get him. In which case we might already have our future on the roster in Bryce Petty. having said that I really like Lynch, I just think he's going to go way higher than we can afford to trade up to. I can't agree to selling the farm to go get him because we need pass rushers at OLB just as much as we need a QB not to mention adding talent at WR, RB, S and OL.....we don't have the ammo beyond Mo and there are intriguing QB options in Hackenberg, Brissett and Prescott elsewhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoop24 Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 10 hours ago, RoadFan said: Option 3. DO NOT DRAFT. I think Lynch plays like a coward with happy feet, afraid of getting hit. His little spiked hairdo and flavor saver facial hair thing are just so hipster though... Lmaoo yea his hair that's the perfect reason not to draft him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shockwave Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 10 hours ago, Maxman said: If he is there at 10 there is a very good possibility he will be there when the Bills pick. Just have to get in front of them, so the trade up might not cost an arm and a leg. In my final mock I have Lynch going to Chicago. I believe they are the big front runners for him(Along with Cleveland and Buffalo IMO) that no one is talking about. They have worked him out privately and have strong interest in him. As mentioned earlier if we want lynch we would likely have to move into the top 10. Lynch sits this year then Chicago can finally get rid of Cutler next year. Quote The Chicago Tribune speculates the Bears could target a quarterback in the draft. Jay Cutler has won over coach John Fox, who called him the "one of the brightest spots" of the Bears' 2015 season, but it still makes sense for Chicago to start planning for the future. The guaranteed money on Cutler's deal runs out after this season, and the 33-year-old has never truly established himself as a top-line starter. Without a solid backup on the roster, it would not be surprising if the Bears decided to grab a quarterback in the middle rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 12 hours ago, jetrider said: A spotlight kid on the Jets? Never ... Wait, he's really got this sh*t on his face??? Hard pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTL Jet Fan Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 I voted yes. The only issue will be we are going to have to jump up as high as between 4-6. He is not going to fall. I think SF would make a move for him also. I just dont think we have enough to make it happen. I wouldnt be suprised if he is taken at 2 not saying that it will happen but it wouldnt suprise me. No way he is there at 20. He might not make it pass Dallas, I know they say they love Elliot but a QB would be a smart move given Romo's health. He is basically a hard hit away from season ending IR every year.. Moving up to 3 after seeing who the first 2 QB's that get selected is the only way to ensure we get Lynch. It would cost us. I know many will disagree but its just my opinion. I would prefer we moved up to #11 as 3 is way to steep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pcola Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 I tend to agree with FTL. If Lynch makes it past SF & Cle, we should be calling TB & the NYG. Den and Cle are rumored to be trying to move up in front of the Jets in order to get him. We can't sit on our hands on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetrider Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 1 hour ago, JiF said: Wait, he's really got this sh*t on his face??? Hard pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 3 minutes ago, jetrider said: Dude, that's a grown man grizzly bear. Not some peach fuzz foomanchew ugly pubic hair type sh*t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dcat Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 I'm still reeling and dumbfounded by even the thought of trading up for Lynch. Yikes. Put all our eggs in the Lynch basket? Maybe it's us who has the 18 Wonderlich score and not Lynch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 This thread title reads like what people are going to want to do to Macc in about 83 hours when we take another 3-4 DE at 20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 pauline wrote that he thinks hackenberg will be gone by early 2nd round and could possibly be drafted ahead of lynch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainejet Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 Well, with the current compliment of picks we currently have, I would say it's either OT or edge rusher. Those would be the guys if the Jets were looking for immediate day 1 starters. But if the Jets trade Mo? Then it becomes interesting because there's a good likelihood that the Jets would have an extra 1st rounder at their disposal. If that's the case? Then I would want Lynch and an OT. That would be my ideal 1st rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green DNA Posted April 25, 2016 Share Posted April 25, 2016 The fact that there is so much debate over the value of this guy tells me that that you pick him if he is there but do not mortgage the future to move up for him. This a classic boom or bust case and we all know how those scenarios always seem to play out for the Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.