T0mShane Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 The Team With The Most Improved Super Bowl LII Odds After The Dravt May Surprise You by John Breech http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/the-team-with-most-improved-super-bowl-lii-odds-after-the-draft-might-surprise-you/ No starting quarterback over the age of 40 has ever won a Super Bowl, but don't tell that to the oddsmakers in Las Vegas, because they clearly don't care. In their latest Super Bowl odds, the William Hill sportsbook in Nevada has listed the Patriots as a heavy favorite to win it all next season, despite the fact that Tom Brady will be 40 by the time his team kicks off the regular season in September. The odds released by William Hill this week are the first ones to come out since the NFL Draft ended back on April 29. The Patriots, who were originally listed as a 4-1 favorite to win it all when William Hill first released its odds in February, are now being given 3-1 odds. That's the best odds of any team. The latest odds take into account what each team did both in free agency and during the draft. So who's the biggest winner in William Hill's post-draft odds? That would be the Houston Texans . The Texans saw their odds drastically improve after they traded up to grab Deshaun Watson during the first round of the NFL Draft on April 27. The Texans, who opened at 40-1 to win Super Bowl LII, are now listed at 20-1. That's the largest jump that any team made in William Hill's latest odds. Basically, getting rid of Brock Osweiler and adding a quarterback who's not Brock Osweiler did wonders for the Texans' odds. The Browns should think about doing the same thing. The Giants and Eagles were two other teams who saw their odds improve. As a matter of fact, the NFC East was one of just two divisions -- along with the AFC West -- where every team had an odds change over the past three months. In the NFC East, the Cowboys ' odds got slightly worse (from 7-1 to 8-1), which probably had a lot to do with the fact that the Giants and Eagles both improved. Oddsmakers clearly loved the fact that Carson Wentz now has more weapons, because the Eagles went from 50-1 to 40-1. That was the second-best improvement by any team. In something that was somewhat of a surprise, the Giants saw their odds go from 25-1 to 18-1. That 18-to-1 listing makes the Giants one of the top eight favorites to win it all next season. By the way, since we're talking about New York, now seems like the time to bring up the Jets , who have turned into a laughingstock in Vegas. The oddsmakers clearly hated the Jets' draft, what they did in free agency and the fact they don't have a starting quarterback, because the Jets' odds tumbled. The Jets went from 75-1 in February to 200-1 as of this week. Not only did the Jets have the ugliest drop on William Hill's list, but they have the second-worst odds of any team (in news that probably won't surprise you, the Browns are the worst at 250-1). The oddsmakers also had a good laugh at the Bears ' expense. Following a draft where Chicago pulled off one of the most questionable trades in recent NFL history, the Bears' odds fell from 100-1 to 125-1. It appears that oddsmakers don't think the team has any hope in 2017 with Mike Glennon or Mitchell Trubisky. Anyway, the most popular team to bet on over the past three months has been the Raiders , who've pulled in 11 percent of the Super Bowl bets at William Hill. Packers and Cowboys fans have also been active, with seven percent of Super Bowl bets being placed on each of those two teams. The Patriots and Seahawks are next on the list, with each team getting six percent of all Super Bowl bets at William Hill. Although the Patriots haven't been the most popular team to bet on, they are pulling in the big bettors. Through three months, the Patriots have pulled in 23 percent of the money wagered at William Hill, which is the highest of any NFL team. Basically, the six percent of fans who have bet on the Patriots have bet 23 percent of the money, while the 11 percent of Raiders fans who have bet on Oakland have only bet nine percent of the money. Packers and Cowboys fans have also been betting big, with each team pulling in eight percent of the money on Super Bowl LII bets. You can see the Super Bowl odds for every team listed below. Super Bowl LII will kick off on Feb. 4, 2018, in Minneapolis. Super Bowl LII odds (via William Hill) Patriots: 3-1 (Opened: 4-1) Raiders: 15-2 (Opened: 12-1) Cowboys: 8-1 (Opened: 7-1) Packers: 17-2 (Opened: 12-1) Steelers : 12-1 Falcons : 12-1 Seahawks: 12-1 Giants: 18-1 (Opened: 25-1) Texans: 20-1 (Opened: 40-1) Broncos : 25-1 (Opened: 20-1) Vikings : 25-1 Chiefs : 30-1 (Opened: 20-1) Cardinals : 30-1 (Opened: 20-1) Buccaneers : 30-1 Colts : 40-1 (Opened: 20-1) Panthers : 40-1 (Opened: 20-1) Ravens : 40-1 (Opened: 30-1) Eagles: 40-1 (Opened: 50-1) Dolphins : 40-1 Lions : 50-1 Titans : 50-1 Saints : 50-1 Redskins : 60-1 (Opened: 50-1) Bengals : 60-1 (Opened: 50-1) Bills : 100-1 (Opened: 50-1) Chargers : 100-1 (Opened: 60-1) Jaguars : 100-1 Rams : 125-1 (Opened: 100-1) Bears: 125-1 (Opened: 100-1) 49ers: 150-1 Jets: 200-1 (Opened: 75-1) Browns: 250-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LAD_Brooklyn Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Why have full year scouts? Woody maybe better off just hiring these "experts" from Vegas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Solid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 The real mystery is how they were ever 75-1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe W. Namath Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Jets will be the worst team in the nfl. This is a 1-15 type season. This is not news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pac Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 fake news... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 35 minutes ago, CTM said: Solid Except Browns > Jets situationally. Better draft, Better Roster, Better Coach, Better front office and Have an extra 1 next year to get one of the bluechip QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 47 minutes ago, T0mShane said: By the way, since we're talking about New York, now seems like the time to bring up the Jets , who have turned into a laughingstock in Vegas. The oddsmakers clearly hated the Jets' draft, what they did in free agency and the fact they don't have a starting quarterback, because the Jets' odds tumbled. The Jets went from 75-1 in February to 200-1 as of this week. Not only did the Jets have the ugliest drop on William Hill's list, but they have the second-worst odds of any team (in news that probably won't surprise you, the Browns are the worst at 250-1). "Unconscionable Skeptics" of the Two-Safety Strategy? lol In fairness, the unconscionable skeptics are the betting public. The odds are made based on how they think the people will bet. If they didn't move the odds down, too few people would bet on the Jets at the previous, now-too-high odds. Or that's what Vegas believes. Then again, I'd "bet" a disproportionate percentage people to bet on the Jets to win the SB in general are Jets fans (in contrast to those betting on the Pats or other good teams that actually have a chance). In conclusion, the "unconscionable skeptics" are therefore the (betting) Jets fans themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetFaninMI Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 One thing my daddy always told me in no uncertain terms NEVER PUT MONEY ON THE JETS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fibonacci Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 11 minutes ago, JetFaninMI said: One thing my daddy always told me in no uncertain terms NEVER PUT MONEY ON THE JETS. Bad advice. Always put money on Jets losing. In the long run, you will always win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetdawgg Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 55 minutes ago, slats said: The real mystery is how they were ever 75-1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Earth to dipsh*t. The point is to lose the games next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SickJetFan Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Buy low sell high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Long Island Leprechaun Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 I would have felt so much better if the Jets were merely 100-1. That way they would have been neck and neck with the Jags, who must be thrilled to be so close to winning it all. For once, we are where we want to be. I would think any intelligent fan would be content with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoBowles Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 NFL is a copycat league, after we get Darnold next year, many teams will start drafting S with their top two draft picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
win4ever Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 It's quite clear we are in a rebuilding year, so I'm not surprised about the lack of faith in them. However, Vegas odds aren't really as much about their predictions based on expert research, because they really aren't in the business of football. They are in the business of gambling, and reading reactions. Right now Houston made a big move with Watson, already have a top tier team everywhere else so they are going to be a sleeper team now (especially since Watson is a known name) and many bettors will see that they gave the Pats the most trouble in the AFC Playoffs last year, and think Watson could elevate them. That's why they moved, because they are going to be a dark horse darling now in that division. The team that improved the most is really the Bucs this year, because imagine stopping Mike Evans, DeSean Jackson, Chris Goodwin, OJ Howard, with Doug Martin in the backfield. That team is going to move up as well because the money is going to come in hard for them. If anyone Bets on the Jets to win the superbowl this year, they should get some gambling addiction counseling because unless Hackenberg or Petty turn to Tom Brady, we don't have a shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiminy Cricket Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 2 hours ago, T0mShane said: No starting quarterback over the age of 40 has ever won a Super Bowl Don't pay any attention to the men behind the curtain, they are merely manipulating you into betting on the team they have chosen for you. I live in Vegas where it is well known that the odds are actually set by the illuminati. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 2 hours ago, slats said: The real mystery is how they were ever 75-1. They probably thought Fitz was coming back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billo83 Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Honestly, who cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thshadow Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Tom Brady is 40??? The NFL clearly needs better drug testing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTownsell1 Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 I like how some of you are acting like this is a bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 4 hours ago, The Crusher said: Except Browns > Jets situationally. Better draft, Better Roster, Better Coach, Better front office and Have an extra 1 next year to get one of the bluechip QBs. I suggest you lay next seasons fried pork products budget on the Jets. Easy winner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Ahem... That's The Two Safety AND Josh McCown Strategy, pal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DetroitRed Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Fake news, Browns are betterSent from my iPad using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 51 minutes ago, DetroitRed said: Fake news, Browns are better Sent from my iPad using JetNation.com mobile app Maybe, but there's exactly 0% chance the Jets get #1 spot with a once in a decade type QB prospect available. Browns neither, look for SF to land it if Darnold holds up and enters draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 tom its ok to think positive about the team and praise isn't a curse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted May 5, 2017 Author Share Posted May 5, 2017 37 minutes ago, Larz said: tom its ok to think positive about the team and praise isn't a curse I know I wield tremendous influence on both coasts, but even my vast intellectual capital doesn't impact the wiseguys in Vegas, Larz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Weird. I thought Watson sucked so how did the Texans jump so much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoBowles Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 14 minutes ago, JiF said: Weird. I thought Watson sucked so how did the Texans jump so much? Watson is better than anything else they had on their roster, that improves them. Still does not mean he is a franchise QB. Besides, Houston probably gets extra credit for their QB prowess. After all, the last QB they went after was a grand slam for them, so they get the benefit of the doubt here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 4 minutes ago, NoBowles said: Watson is better than anything else they had on their roster, that improves them. Still does not mean he is a franchise QB. Besides, Houston probably gets extra credit for their QB prowess. After all, the last QB they went after was a grand slam for them, so they get the benefit of the doubt here. 40-1 to 20-1? Vegas is saying they found a franchise QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoBowles Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, JiF said: 40-1 to 20-1? Vegas is saying they found a franchise QB. Well, there you have it, I guess anyone questioning Watson as a franchise QB, was flat our wrong. I guess we all have to eat our crow now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 4 minutes ago, NoBowles said: Well, there you have it, I guess anyone questioning Watson as a franchise QB, was flat our wrong. I guess we all have to eat our crow now. I think Vegas is smarter than you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoBowles Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 Just now, JiF said: I think Vegas is smarter than you. Agree completely, they are significantly smarter then me. They got a much higher SAT score than I did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southparkcpa Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 13 hours ago, Joe W. Namath said: Jets will be the worst team in the nfl. This is a 1-15 type season. This is not news. Agreed... the Browns should be above the JETS in that poll. Good job Woody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mphtrilogy Posted May 5, 2017 Share Posted May 5, 2017 I wouldn't mind a 1-15 season to get the top pick, but I think this team will be better than that.. 7-9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.