CrazyCarl40 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 lol, fml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KINGDIRK Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Oh man. I guess I need a new hobby this NFL season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prime21 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 No biggie. The Jets should show interest in all QB's that are or could be available. I'm sure there is a ranking order and a corresponding salary offer limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 As long as he is cheap and is not named the starter right away, I'm perfectly fine with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Jets fan Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 This means they are going with the kids and he is the vet back up. Perfect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, Joe Jets fan said: This means they are going with the kids and he is the vet back up. Perfect yes. maybe they think hackenberg will be ready by training camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliforniaJet Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 This would be the Jets thing to do, the next Fitz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOJOTOWNSELL Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Ive always had a soft spot for Brian Hoyer as a player.....the guy has played well and never got a fair shake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, CaliforniaJet said: This would be the Jets thing to do, the next Fitz. Why do you say that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike135 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 It's about God damn time! Should've done this or similar last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTownsell1 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, CaliforniaJet said: This would be the Jets thing to do, the next Fitz. You don't get it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Not sure why people would be upset by this. We don't have a starting-caliber QB on the roster and Hoyer will come relatively cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarletKnight89 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 If they were to sign Hoyer that's fine with me. But I want Hoyer as the backup to Hack or Petty. Don't try to sell me on Brian Hoyer as the week 1 starter. There is no point. He's the type of guy that can win you enough games to knock you out of the top 5 for the draft. No point in playing Brian Hoyer and going 5-11/6-10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, dbatesman said: Not sure why people would be upset by this. We don't have a starting-caliber QB on the roster and Hoyer will come relatively cheap. Because some people, who have been oblivious, don't see the writing on the wall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, ScarletKnight89 said: If they were to sign Hoyer that's fine with me. But I want Hoyer as the backup to Hack or Petty. Don't try to sell me on Brian Hoyer as the week 1 starter. There is no point. He's the type of guy that can win you enough games to knock you out of the top 5 for the draft. No point in playing Brian Hoyer and going 5-11/6-10. Don't name him the starter immediately and have a QB competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoni Beast Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Id like it cause for his asking price its fair value and would make our tank complete. But he'll go to SF most likely, if they cant turn a trade for Cousins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Joe Jets fan said: This means they are going with the kids and he is the vet back up. Perfect I agree. This would be a great strategy and allow them to spend on other things now. 1 minute ago, CaliforniaJet said: This would be the Jets thing to do, the next Fitz. We must remember that when the Jets traded for Fitz he was under a 2 year contract for about 4mm/year. He was a veteran backup. When it was apparent that Fitz was going to be a starter, Fitz and his agent wanted starter money, and they fought about it. We know how that ended. Hoyer may think he is going to be a starter and want more money. The fair deal would be a backup base with a bonus for games started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebag Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, UnitedWhofans said: Because some people, who have been oblivious, doesn't see the writing on the wall Kettle, meet Mr. Pot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DetroitRed Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Why bother? Why waste time and $? I'd rather suck with Hack or PettySent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 A stopgap vet? Well now that's a refreshing approach. Jst re-sign Geno on the cheap and let him pursue that elusive third "worst QB in the NFL" title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarletKnight89 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, UnitedWhofans said: Don't name him the starter immediately and have a QB competition. I don't even want Hoyer involved in a QB competition. I know where the season is going if he's the guy. Use Hoyer in mop up duty if the games get out of hand. Let Petty and Hack have the QB competition. The problem is, Hoyer could very well outplay both of them. If Hoyer is going to be our answer at QB, we might as well play the kids and worst case we end up with a top pick and a shot at Darnold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Cant wait till Todd Bowles announces him the starter for the 2017 season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, AFJF said: A stopgap vet? Well now that's a refreshing approach. Jst re-sign Geno on the cheap and let him pursue that elusive third "worst QB in the NFL" title. Geno is a stopgap vet too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbt Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, ScarletKnight89 said: If they were to sign Hoyer that's fine with me. But I want Hoyer as the backup to Hack or Petty. Don't try to sell me on Brian Hoyer as the week 1 starter. There is no point. He's the type of guy that can win you enough games to knock you out of the top 5 for the draft. No point in playing Brian Hoyer and going 5-11/6-10. Bowles will say with that stupid look on his face "Hoyer is the starter because he gives us the best chance to win" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTownsell1 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, DetroitRed said: Why bother? Why waste time and $? I'd rather suck with Hack or Petty Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app I think that is the plan, but you generally want to have at least 1 veteran QB on your roster. Hoyer makes far more sense than a Tyrod Taylor IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, Adoni Beast said: Id like it cause for his asking price its fair value and would make our tank complete. But he'll go to SF most likely, if they cant turn a trade for Cousins. Is McCown available if Hoyer is not? That to me is the right approach. Trade down, sign a CB, and draft a QB. Keep drafting QBs until they find one. As with the Patriots, they can trade Jimmy G for basically a better pick than they used to draft him, and he was a backup that won them games. And he was cheaper than a veteran backup. That is a brilliant strategy. If a good QB is available, they should take him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, ScarletKnight89 said: I don't even want Hoyer involved in a QB competition. I know where the season is going if he's the guy. Use Hoyer in mop up duty if the games get out of hand. Let Petty and Hack have the QB competition. The problem is, Hoyer could very well outplay both of them. If Hoyer is going to be our answer at QB, we might as well play the kids and worst case we end up with a top pick and a shot at Darnold. Why? If Hackenberg and Petty can't beat Brian Hoyer in a QB competition, that tells you a TON about Petty and Hackenberg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stark Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 WHY!!!!!!!!!!??????????????!!!!!!!!!!!! just stick with Petty, Hack and then draft a QB... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, Stark said: WHY!!!!!!!!!!??????????????!!!!!!!!!!!! just stick with Petty, Hack and then draft a QB... You don't want 3 young QBs on a roster. That's not a good idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRL Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Bringing him in on a one year $3 million deal, drafting a QB and having a four way battle in camp isn't the worst thing in the world. Having a QB depth chart of: Hoyer Watson / Mahomes Hackenberg Going into the season wouldn't be awful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lego My Lageman Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Im fine with this because Veteran backup or Tank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliforniaJet Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 8 minutes ago, UnitedWhofans said: Why do you say that? Because the team loves scrub veterans at QB. Just go with the young guys, enough with these scubs taking reps from the kids. If they suck they suck, but lets find out already. What do we need a veteran scrub like Hoyer for? What knowledge does he have that would help this team? Skills he has none. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, JoJoTownsell1 said: I think that is the plan, but you generally want to have at least 1 veteran QB on your roster. Hoyer makes far more sense than a Tyrod Taylor IMO. If they sign Hoyer he's going to start. Bowles is a stubborn stuck in the 1980's coach. refused to draft Lynch last year because he didnt want to play a rookie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, KRL said: Bringing him in on a one year $3 million deal, drafting a QB and having a four way battle in camp isn't the worst thing in the world. Having a QB depth chart of: Hoyer Watson / Mahomes Hackenberg Going into the season wouldn't be awful Camp is glorified OTA's these days. There arent enough reps for two QB's let alone 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.