Warfish Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 I ask, because I really think it is. Never in my lifetime can I recall a time where Jets Fan Nation was so deeply, aggressively, and passionately split on who should play QB for our team. Fitz? Geno? Glennon? Petty? Draft Pick? There are folks deeply entrenched in each of these options, and they seemingly denounce every other option completely and utterly. I think we're all well aware we, as a franchise, have a weak and limited history of quality QB play. Namath, of course, and some other guys and thats about it. But can you recall a time where the fanbase was this divided over this many potential options before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 "Alex, I'll take 'someone who doesn't suck' for $500." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebag Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 No, 1976 to present. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 The Chad. People either thought Pennington was elite as f*ck or the single worst human being to ever draw breath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section314 Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 I can think of one right off the top of my head. 1979...Matt Robinson v Richard Todd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike135 Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Does seem pretty divisive around here. I know I'm just mainly against paying Fitz (or any other team's hand-me-down) anything over 4mil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 7 hours ago, Irish Jet said: The Chad. People either thought Pennington was elite as f*ck or the single worst human being to ever draw breath. And Sanchez. He was either a victim of his own suck or a victim of the suck of the team and coaches around him. (I mean, there still is this controversy for some). I think the intensity of these prior "controversies" just get forgotten about, even after only a few years go by. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainejet Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 9 minutes ago, Warfish said: I ask, because I really think it is. Never in my lifetime can I recall a time where Jets Fan Nation was so deeply, aggressively, and passionately split on who should play QB for our team. Fitz? Geno? Glennon? Petty? Draft Pick? There are folks deeply entrenched in each of these options, and they seemingly denounce every other option completely and utterly. I think we're all well aware we, as a franchise, have a weak and limited history of quality QB play. Namath, of course, and some other guys and thats about it. But can you recall a time where the fanbase was this divided over this many potential options before? The ONLY logical solution, at least for right now, is RYAN FITZPATRICK. Geno has already shown that he is very irresponsible both on and off the field, and his play has always been subpar. The only problem with that is, as much as every reporter is optimistic that eventually Fitz and the Jets will come to an agreement, Fitz is starting to have hard feelings. That is what I heard watching NFL network a few days ago. When you have a good QB in your midst you MUST take advantage of that. Good QB's do NOT grow on trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage69 Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 1 minute ago, Mainejet said: The ONLY logical solution, at least for right now, is RYAN FITZPATRICK. Geno has already shown that he is very irresponsible both on and off the field, and his play has always been subpar. The only problem with that is, as much as every reporter is optimistic that eventually Fitz and the Jets will come to an agreement, Fitz is starting to have hard feelings. That is what I heard watching NFL network a few days ago. When you have a good QB in your midst you MUST take advantage of that. Good QB's do NOT grow on trees. True but a few we have had came from a Lemon tree.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe W. Namath Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Chad/Clemens Sanchez/Tebow this isnt even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradis Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 no, the days of Penningtologists vs the people raged on forever... Sanchez was more just frustration on varying levels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 the pennington debates were legendary on JI. hope we draft someone to have more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 It's so divisive because every one of these options each suck in their own special way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 sh*t vs. sh*t is a tough decision when you think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Yes, this is by far the most divisive I've seen since I started following the Jets which admittedly is a lot shorter of a time than most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EM31 Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Not sure how so much energy is being poured into what is essentially a consensus "none of the above" slate of candidates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenwichjetfan Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Fist: I'm sure you remember the "Penningtonlogists" vs "Anti Chad Militia". Pretty sure anytime you have two groups of people willing to start, name, and organize within two opposing clans on an internet messageboard, it's serious stuff. Moreso than the various factions we've got going on now between all of the different options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chirorob Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 6 minutes ago, JiF said: sh*t vs. sh*t is a tough decision when you think about it. My thing, is it isn't crap vs crap. Fitz is not bad. No, he should not get 15 millions. But he had a good year. The team won 10 games. Beat the Giants. Beat the Pats. Some good wins. He played through a tough hand injury. People act like he's crap, he isn't . They act like it's sign Fitz or sign that 23 year old Franchise QB. It isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyLV Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 I am anti Fitz and think he is a complete JAG and last year was an illusion created by good coaching (which would apply to any Jets QB), Brandon Marshall and his influence on the offense (which would apply to to any Jets QB) and the fact that we literally had the easiest schedule in recent NFL history, despite playing NE twice (which will apply to NO Jets QB this year.) I am especially opposed to Fitz at ANY salary that uses future cap space and think that even $7 million a year is completely NUTS for Fitz. I believe that the combination of Gailey with Decker/Marshall would make any QB we throw out there successful. I think we would have as good of a record if not better with Geno at the helm last year. It was an offense very suited to him. I do not think Geno is necessarily the answer but because our staff was too short sighted to play him once healthy, we do not know. In 2016, I think any competent QB will play at least as well as Fitz will in 2016. And I think it is completely unrealistic and goes against proven history to think that he will play anywhere near as well as he did next year. I am not a fan of Glennon. I would not trade for him. I would be OK with Geno starting and seeing what he can do. I would be OK with Bryce starting and seeing what he can do. I would be OK with whatever price it takes to get Wentz IF AND ONLY IF the Jets FO is completely unanimous in their belief that he is a 10 year franchise guy. Three first rounders? Fine. If you believe firmly he is the guy long term the loss of 2 first rounders is a pittance. BTW, people forget that. The cost of giving three first rounders to get to #1 is not 3 #1s really but 2 as we get one back. Seems to me there is more than a 30% chance that the next 2 first round picks will be busts or JAGS anyway. I am NOT OK with Fitz starting again. It continues the cycle of spinning our wheels at QB and accomplishes nothing to make this team better in the long term. Oh and before you say it, would rather have a Hasselback as the veteran presence if needed for a rookie or 2nd year QB like Bryce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 17 hours ago, Mainejet said: The ONLY logical solution, at least for right now, is RYAN FITZPATRICK. Geno has already shown that he is very irresponsible both on and off the field, and his play has always been subpar. The only problem with that is, as much as every reporter is optimistic that eventually Fitz and the Jets will come to an agreement, Fitz is starting to have hard feelings. That is what I heard watching NFL network a few days ago. When you have a good QB in your midst you MUST take advantage of that. Good QB's do NOT grow on trees. It is not at all "the only logical solution," and even such "only logical solution" solutions cease to be so if the money is too high (which it is). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike135 Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 50 minutes ago, Mainejet said: Good QB's do NOT grow on trees. Or, apparently, in Harvard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Just now, Mike135 said: Or, apparently, in Harvard. lol ok that one was funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Richard "toad" Todd vs. Matt Robinson was pretty divisive according to my father, who was adamant it should have been Robinson for the record... Idzik's father preferred "Toad." Shocker... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanatic Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 1 minute ago, RoadFan said: Richard "toad" Todd vs. Matt Robinson was pretty divisive according to my father, who was adamant it should have been Robinson for the record... I lived it, it was extremely divisive. I still remember the "We want Matt" chants after Michaels benched him for lying to him on how he suffered his thumb injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ylekram Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 22 minutes ago, johnnysd said: I am anti Fitz and think he is a complete JAG and last year was an illusion created by good coaching (which would apply to any Jets QB), Brandon Marshall and his influence on the offense (which would apply to to any Jets QB) and the fact that we literally had the easiest schedule in recent NFL history, despite playing NE twice (which will apply to NO Jets QB this year.) I am especially opposed to Fitz at ANY salary that uses future cap space and think that even $7 million a year is completely NUTS for Fitz. I believe that the combination of Gailey with Decker/Marshall would make any QB we throw out there successful. I think we would have as good of a record if not better with Geno at the helm last year. It was an offense very suited to him. I do not think Geno is necessarily the answer but because our staff was too short sighted to play him once healthy, we do not know. In 2016, I think any competent QB will play at least as well as Fitz will in 2016. And I think it is completely unrealistic and goes against proven history to think that he will play anywhere near as well as he did next year. I am not a fan of Glennon. I would not trade for him. I would be OK with Geno starting and seeing what he can do. I would be OK with Bryce starting and seeing what he can do. I would be OK with whatever price it takes to get Wentz IF AND ONLY IF the Jets FO is completely unanimous in their belief that he is a 10 year franchise guy. Three first rounders? Fine. If you believe firmly he is the guy long term the loss of 2 first rounders is a pittance. BTW, people forget that. The cost of giving three first rounders to get to #1 is not 3 #1s really but 2 as we get one back. Seems to me there is more than a 30% chance that the next 2 first round picks will be busts or JAGS anyway. I am NOT OK with Fitz starting again. It continues the cycle of spinning our wheels at QB and accomplishes nothing to make this team better in the long term. Oh and before you say it, would rather have a Hasselback as the veteran presence if needed for a rookie or 2nd year QB like Bryce. yes, johnny. its year 4 in genos nfl career, and wie still dont know what geno is. WE MUST FIND OUT!!! i hear that its the 4th gifted starting job that determines everything in this league Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 59 minutes ago, Mainejet said: The ONLY logical solution, at least for right now, is RYAN FITZPATRICK. You must be smoking the crack that Geno sold you! lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 52 minutes ago, Mainejet said: The ONLY logical solution, at least for right now, is RYAN FITZPATRICK. Geno has already shown that he is very irresponsible both on and off the field, and his play has always been subpar. The only problem with that is, as much as every reporter is optimistic that eventually Fitz and the Jets will come to an agreement, Fitz is starting to have hard feelings. That is what I heard watching NFL network a few days ago. When you have a good QB in your midst you MUST take advantage of that. Good QB's do NOT grow on trees. Lol. I so do not care about Fitz's feelings. Not one single GM is willing to give him what he wants. Not a single one has offered more than the Jets have. He needs to put his feelings aside and recognize reality; this is a business, and this is his worth to that business. His hard negotiating stance is leading the Jets to look in other directions. He could easily find himself making less than the reported $7/8M, or out of work altogether if his ego won't accept that. He and his agent have overvalued their position, and misplayed their hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 The problem is people dismiss Geno and Glennon think they know everything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRy56 Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Pennington debate > Sanchez debate > Fitz debate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, slats said: Lol. I so do not care about Fitz's feelings. Not one single GM is willing to give him what he wants. Not a single one has offered more than the Jets have. He needs to put his feelings aside and recognize reality; this is a business, and this is his worth to that business. His hard negotiating stance is leading the Jets to look in other directions. He could easily find himself making less than the reported $7/8M, or out of work altogether if his ego won't accept that. He and his agent have overvalued their position, and misplayed their hand. Of all people who should understand this, it should be Ryan Fitzpatrick. He's a Harvard grad. I was reminded every time I wanted to watch a damn Jets game last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 1 hour ago, Irish Jet said: The Chad. People either thought Pennington was elite as f*ck or the single worst human being to ever draw breath. this lol.. someone wasn't on jets message boards from 2002-2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bergen Jet Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Since I know you were on the boards back during the Pennington days... what the hell are you smoking my friend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebag Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 We should pay Fitz 1 million dollars per playoff game he's won or participated in.....wait...wut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 This isn't really that divisive of an issue. It's like the same 7-8 people who keep calling for Geno in every thread and most of the fanbase realizes the guy's not a starter and a pretty big doucher. I think the majority of the fanbase seems content with the idea of not wrecking the cap to pay Fitz a gazillion dollars and the Jets moving forward into the unknown and starting to finally find a QB for the future. If they can get Fitz back at a reasonable price, great. If not, fine. But anything other than wasting yet another year to see if Geno Smith knows how to not throw a billion turnovers and act like an adult when he steps off the field. The fact that they're not as vocal as a very small minority is probably just indicative of people not wanting to waste their time over a very stupid topic. I mean come on, Geno Smith? Who the hell wants to spend this much time talking about Geno Smith? Guy's been nothing but a bane of existence since he was babied into and handed a job and is trash on the field to boot. Blech. Next quarterback and more importantly next topic please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted April 1, 2016 Share Posted April 1, 2016 Yeah, usually we just have ONE sh*tty choice. Sent from my VS930 4G using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.