JetsAddict Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalcott Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 He would not do well in the NY fishbowl.. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JoeNamathsFurCoat Posted January 23, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted January 23, 2023 60M payout in ‘23 for a 40-year old QB is absurd The only guys I would even consider at that cost is Mahomes or Burrow, and that’s obviously not happening Let another team be a sucker and bail out the Packers Rodgers at this point is a guy who won’t do OTAs and you’d be lucky if he shows up to camp on time He has zero chemistry with any WRs on the Jets and his game is entirely based on timing and anticipation and him being able to rely on his WRs to run exactly what he’s expecting in his mind, whatever that is Knowing the Jets luck, they’d swoop in and give up 3 firsts or something stupid like that and Rodgers would either retire during training camp or after going 1 and done in the playoffs 4 2 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JoJoTownsell1 Posted January 23, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted January 23, 2023 2 minutes ago, JoeNamathsFurCoat said: 60M payout in ‘23 for a 40-year old QB is absurd The only guys I would even consider at that cost is Mahomes or Burrow Let another team be a sucker and bail out the Packers Knowing the Jets luck, they’d swoop in and give up 3 firsts or something stupid like that and Rodgers would either retire during training camp or after going 1 and done in the playoffs His contract is why the trade cost will be far lower than the media is reporting. 10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeNamathsFurCoat Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 5 minutes ago, JoJoTownsell1 said: His contract is why the trade cost will be far lower than the media is reporting. You’d still be on the hook for 50M per for a mercurial guy who’s one bad haircut away from retirement (or threatening retirement or holdout or demanding Randall Cobb be signed or whatever) and at his age, the cliff could come at any time The decline has arguably already started Just in football terms, if you’re asking whether I’d want Rodgers or Zach Wilson as the ‘23 QB, obviously that’s a no brainer But it’s not that simple 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 Matt LaFleur and Gutenkunst out here BEGGING for a Russell Wilson package is too funny 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greasyt Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 I think he's our best option of all the qb's that will be available......................I also know that if we somehow trade for him, he's a broken collarbone waiting to happen. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyT Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 There was no breakdown other we would have to pay him 60mil and give up a 1st and probably more. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bla bla bla Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 20 minutes ago, JoeNamathsFurCoat said: 60M payout in ‘23 for a 40-year old QB is absurd The only guys I would even consider at that cost is Mahomes or Burrow, and that’s obviously not happening Let another team be a sucker and bail out the Packers Rodgers at this point is a guy who won’t do OTAs and you’d be lucky if he shows up to camp on time He has zero chemistry with any WRs on the Jets and his game is entirely based on timing and anticipation and him being able to rely on his WRs to run exactly what he’s expecting in his mind, whatever that is Knowing the Jets luck, they’d swoop in and give up 3 firsts or something stupid like that and Rodgers would either retire during training camp or after going 1 and done in the playoffs The $60m would be spread over 2 years. I think it's like $15m 2023 and like $45m in 2024 but that would be dead cap. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bla bla bla Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 Rodgers = Home Run Move + 2024 punt Jackson = Home Run Move + handcuff Carr = Long term + maybe develop a QB under less pressure Garoppolo = Steady eddy but want to see Zach again 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PS17 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 6 minutes ago, bla bla bla said: Rodgers = Home Run Move + 2024 punt Jackson = Home Run Move + handcuff Carr = Long term + maybe develop a QB under less pressure Garoppolo = Steady eddy but want to see Zach again You had me until the Z word 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JustInFudge Posted January 23, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted January 23, 2023 2 minutes ago, bla bla bla said: Rodgers = Home Run Move + 2024 punt Jackson = Home Run Move + handcuff Carr = Long term + maybe develop a QB under less pressure Garoppolo = Steady eddy but want to see Zach again Rodgers = Super Bowl expectations for 2 years Jackson = sustained winning franchise w/ yearly playoff/Super Bowl aspirations Carr = battle for a playoff spot and maybe if everything goes right, get in and win a game Garoppolo = better have a good back up 10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 Imagine what we have to pay to retain sauce breece JJ etc in 2-3 years. Go all in now 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornJetsFan1983 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 13 minutes ago, TommyT said: There was no breakdown other we would have to pay him 60mil and give up a 1st and probably more. those terms are not acceptable to me. I love to have him but 60 mil for him is crazy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsAddict Posted January 23, 2023 Author Share Posted January 23, 2023 29 minutes ago, JoJoTownsell1 said: His contract is why the trade cost will be far lower than the media is reporting. Send Ambassador Johnson to handle the difficult negotiation 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, JiFields said: Rodgers = Super Bowl expectations for 2 years Jackson = sustained winning franchise w/ yearly playoff/Super Bowl aspirations Carr = battle for a playoff spot and maybe if everything goes right, get in and win a game Garoppolo = better have a good back up Rodgers has benefited from being on mostly good teams in a bad division since 2009. He has been to the Super Bowl exactly once. He doesn’t play well when his team has to come from behind, and as soon as a couple of things go wrong he pouts and points a finger at everyone but himself. He would join a strong division in the AFCE and have to go through Burrow, Mahomes and Allen. I would not have “SB expectations” with him because it is a guarantee he would have to win a couple of games when things aren’t always going according to plan. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maynard13 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 45 minutes ago, JoeNamathsFurCoat said: 60M payout in ‘23 for a 40-year old QB is absurd The only guys I would even consider at that cost is Mahomes or Burrow, and that’s obviously not happening Let another team be a sucker and bail out the Packers Rodgers at this point is a guy who won’t do OTAs and you’d be lucky if he shows up to camp on time He has zero chemistry with any WRs on the Jets and his game is entirely based on timing and anticipation and him being able to rely on his WRs to run exactly what he’s expecting in his mind, whatever that is Knowing the Jets luck, they’d swoop in and give up 3 firsts or something stupid like that and Rodgers would either retire during training camp or after going 1 and done in the playoffs And he’d want that fur coat thrown in as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeNamathsFurCoat Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 39 minutes ago, T0mShane said: Matt LaFleur and Gutenkunst out here BEGGING for a Russell Wilson package is too funny It's funny unless Woody is the one who ends up taking the bait. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, JetsAddict said: Roofie him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeNamathsFurCoat Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 15 minutes ago, Maynard13 said: And he’d want that fur coat thrown in as well Yeah, and just wait til Rodgers rolls into to camp at his first presser and puts Joe Douglas on blast for not having acquired Randall Cobb. Rodgers' personality doesn't even bother me. It's just hard to imagine it working out. If you do that, you have to win it all in '23 or '24 (under the constraints of severe cap limitations because of his contract) before Rodger's arm falls off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAM SAM HE'S OUR MAN Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, JetsAddict said: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peekskill68 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 Woody doesn't have the cajones to go all in on Rodgers for a 2-year push to a title (like Tampa did with Brady/Rams did with Stafford, etc). I'm curious to see what Jerry Jones does since he's 80 years old and he has to realize he's never going to get by the Eagles with McCarthy and Prescott... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeNamathsFurCoat Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 ok so, some fact-checking. Spotrac says Rodgers' cap hit would be 31.6 M in '23. That's fine. https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/aaron-rodgers-3745/ But LOL if the Packers were to cut him in the offseason, his dead cap charge would be an absolute joke: 100M ($99,778,568) The real issues loom in '24 and '25 with the gargantuan cap hits (40.7M and 59.3M) and potential dead cap (24.48 M and 16.32 M) if he falls off a cliff at any point between now and then. Brady is the ultimate anomaly, and even he finally looks washed at 45. Rodgers turns 40 in December. The odds of him regaining / sustaining anything close to his MVP form in '23 and beyond are slim to none. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docdhc Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 39 minutes ago, RoadFan said: Rodgers has benefited from being on mostly good teams in a bad division since 2009. He has been to the Super Bowl exactly once. He doesn’t play well when his team has to come from behind, and as soon as a couple of things go wrong he pouts and points fingers at everyone but himself. He would join a strong division in the AFCE and have to go through Burrow, Mahomes and Allen. I would not have “SB expectations” with him because it is a guarantee he would have to win a couple of games when things aren’t always going according to plan. He also doesn’t like to do off season work anymore so imagine him trying to learn a new offense and get used to new receivers in 5 weeks of training camp. It’s a recipe for disaster. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhg1084 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 If we could fit him in with the salary cap and bring back essentially the same team from last year at the same time go for it why not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 45 minutes ago, RoadFan said: Rodgers has benefited from being on mostly good teams in a bad division since 2009. He has been to the Super Bowl exactly once. He doesn’t play well when his team has to come from behind, and as soon as a couple of things go wrong he pouts and points fingers at everyone but himself. He would join a strong division in the AFCE and have to go through Burrow, Mahomes and Allen. I would not have “SB expectations” with him because it is a guarantee he would have to win a couple of games when things aren’t always going according to plan. All true, you still have Super Bowl expectations when you sign a future HOF'er in an offseason, kind of goes without saying, especially to a team w/ a top 5 D and seemingly some solid young skills players that is only "average QB play away". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyT Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 7 minutes ago, docdhc said: He also doesn’t like to do off season work anymore so imagine him trying to learn a new offense and get used to new receivers in 5 weeks of training camp. It’s a recipe for disaster. I would guess him and Hackett would be a package deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titan24 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, Kalcott said: He would not do well in the NY fishbowl.. Why? Guy is one of best to ever do it….been there done that…..pretty sure he could handle it. In fact 90% of whomever media, fans etc would be kissing his a$% 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 1 hour ago, T0mShane said: Matt LaFleur and Gutenkunst You and your big words 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xtina Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 28 minutes ago, Gastineau Lives said: You and your big words I thought it was a new version of Zeitgeist 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost420 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 1st rounder for Rodgers is absurd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlito1171 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 I don't understand why the Packers didn't throw Rodgers outta Lambeau last year and turn to Love like they did Farve..... The extension made absolutely no sense....they don't even have the roster to take advantage of Rodgers last dance Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyT Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 If we do pick up Rodgers I would also consider signing Allen Lazard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRy56 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 7 minutes ago, TommyT said: If we do pick up Rodgers I would also consider signing Allen Lazard. I would think that would be a borderline certainty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saul Goodman Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 Trading a few 1st round picks and paying Rodgers $40 million/year would be a disaster. He’s far past his prime, and it’d be a stretch to think he could just join a new franchise and give us immediate top-tier production. Very much against acquiring him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.