Jump to content

Anyone have any idea why this might be?


Recommended Posts

I found this quite strange because we know the pressuring the QB has no impact on the game. I wonder why the disparity.

Completion pct with clean pocket vs under pressure:

Pat Mahomes: 76.2/48.9

Lamar Jackson: 73.1/50

Jalen Hurts: 74.7/49.5

Aaron Rodgers (2022): 69.4/47

Josh Allen: 74.4/49.2

Jared Goff: 75.8/49.8


Thinking Idk GIF by Ryan The Creative


 

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, AFJF said:

I found this quite strange because we know the pressuring the QB has no impact on the game. I wonder why the disparity.

Completion pct with clean pocket vs under pressure:

Pat Mahomes: 76.2/48.9

Lamar Jackson: 73.1/50

Jalen Hurts: 74.7/49.5

Aaron Rodgers (2022): 69.4/47

Josh Allen: 74.4/49.2

Jared Goff: 75.8/49.8


Thinking Idk GIF by Ryan The Creative


 

One of life’s great mysteries, because as you said pressuring the QB has no impact on the game.

Odd

200.gif?cid=d9212ad9ukl0j1vobiusojx1sp7z

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AFJF said:

I found this quite strange because we know the pressuring the QB has no impact on the game. I wonder why the disparity.

Completion pct with clean pocket vs under pressure:

Pat Mahomes: 76.2/48.9

Lamar Jackson: 73.1/50

Jalen Hurts: 74.7/49.5

Aaron Rodgers (2022): 69.4/47

Josh Allen: 74.4/49.2

Jared Goff: 75.8/49.8


Thinking Idk GIF by Ryan The Creative


 

There’s everybody else’s QB pressure stat, and then there’s the Jets QB pressure stat.

Other team’s pressure brings about victories, where as Jets’ is of no value in the W-L column .

Easy-peasy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was there a recent  debate that brought this thread? Or is it the age old pressure vs. sack debate?

1 sack is better than than 1 pressure.

Pressures are important. Not sure anyone would say otherwise.

The question is how many pressures are needed to equate to 1 sack?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, GreenFish said:

Was there a recent  debate that brought this thread? Or is it the age old pressure vs. sack debate?

1 sack is better than than 1 pressure.

Pressures are important. Not sure anyone would say otherwise.

The question is how many pressures are needed to equate to 1 sack?

1.543. Based on the ever reliable eyeball test.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dunnie said:

Completion rate for QBs with no offensive line at all ??

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

Don't say that around here.  The only acceptable answer is "He is the worst ever".  And don't you dare bring up that we rebuilt 3/5 of the OL, including both OTs and also drafted an OT at 1.10.

He's the worst ever!  Got it?

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GreenFish said:

Was there a recent  debate that brought this thread? Or is it the age old pressure vs. sack debate?

1 sack is better than than 1 pressure.

Pressures are important. Not sure anyone would say otherwise.

The question is how many pressures are needed to equate to 1 sack?

Agreed. And its a weird thing to bring up NOW. The Jets moved on from the pressure king who did not get a ton of sacks - Huff, and instead traded for a guy who gets a lot of sacks and has a tendency to force fumbles - Reddick. 

So yeah, pressures are good. Sacks (and turnovers) are better. And it seems like the Jets agree. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AFJF said:

I found this quite strange because we know the pressuring the QB has no impact on the game.

 

9 hours ago, Jet Nut said:

One of life’s great mysteries, because as you said pressuring the QB has no impact on the game.

 

5 hours ago, 32EBoozer said:

There’s everybody else’s QB pressure stat, and then there’s the Jets QB pressure stat.

Other team’s pressure brings about victories, where as Jets’ is of no value in the W-L column .

IMG_7608.jpeg.f1560084459cbcf0965f340a22ca9bd8.jpeg

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Larz said:

I definitely missed the origin story here 

That's the beautiful thing about this thread.  Nobody knows the origin story.  The whole thread just emerged from the ether.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jets fans this week acting like JFM was Aaron Donald and we should retire #s from anyone who was good.

Let's raise the bar a little more fellas... you are showing how battered you are 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jet Nut said:

.....because as you said pressuring the QB has no impact on the game.

I'll take "Straw Man Arguments No One Has Actually Ever Made" for $1,000, Alex.

Of course Pressure "effects the game".

But simply citing "player X had a pressure" without citing the result of the play he had that pressure on is telling only half the story.

Once again, it's entirely possible (and the OP data shows that clearly) to have a defender get a "pressure" and the QB to still throw a 70 yard pass for a TD.  In such a case, did that "pressure" effect the play?  Yes.  Did that effect lead to a positive outcome?  Absolutely not.

It's funny how so many folks here just hate the whole story, and want to cherry pick partial "stats" trying to defend guys who don't complete enough sacks, lol.

Because a sack is definitive.  The completion percentage of sacks is 0.0%.  0 TD's.  0 Long Passes.

The argument that HAS been made is "Sacks > Pressures" and guys who get pressures without getting many sacks aren't as valuable as all that, especially without a detailed analysis of the results of those pressures.

Far too much nuance for this simplistic place, of course, lol.

  • Upvote 1
  • Post of the Week 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, AFJF said:

I found this quite strange because we know the pressuring the QB has no impact on the game. I wonder why the disparity.

Completion pct with clean pocket vs under pressure:

Pat Mahomes: 76.2/48.9

Lamar Jackson: 73.1/50

Jalen Hurts: 74.7/49.5

Aaron Rodgers (2022): 69.4/47

Josh Allen: 74.4/49.2

Jared Goff: 75.8/49.8


Thinking Idk GIF by Ryan The Creative


 

Link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, AFJF said:

I found this quite strange because we know the pressuring the QB has no impact on the game. I wonder why the disparity.

Completion pct with clean pocket vs under pressure:

Pat Mahomes: 76.2/48.9

Lamar Jackson: 73.1/50

Jalen Hurts: 74.7/49.5

Aaron Rodgers (2022): 69.4/47

Josh Allen: 74.4/49.2

Jared Goff: 75.8/49.8


Thinking Idk GIF by Ryan The Creative


 

ZachagainsttheDolphinspassrush.Notascreen.jpg.519984b919b68d7d2b28edcac4d2611d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate click bait.  But I hate myself more when I click-knowing it's probably click bait.

Probably how a largemouth bass feels before, during, and after biting a rubber worm.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TuscanyTile2 said:

That's the beautiful thing about this thread.  Nobody knows the origin story.  The whole thread just emerged from the ether.

I see posts like this as an estoeric defense of Zach wilson 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets Add another Tier to the OP's numbers:

Completion pct with clean pocket vs under pressure vs. after being sacked:

Pat Mahomes: 76.2/48.9/0.0

Lamar Jackson: 73.1/50/0.0

Jalen Hurts: 74.7/49.5/0.0

Aaron Rodgers (2022): 69.4/47/0.0

Josh Allen: 74.4/49.2/0.0

Jared Goff: 75.8/49.8/0.0

Wow, that's a huge difference between the lowered comp. % of pressure vs. the lowered completion rate after being sacked.

Now, I wonder how many passing yards and TD's these QB's got from their "under pressure" lower comp. % vs. how many passing yards and TD's they got after they were sacked.

Oh wait, I know that second part.  It's 0 yards and 0 TD's.  Actually it's better than that, it's negative yards!

Yup, sacks really are A LOT better than just pressures.  A lot.  Just like we said (and yall didn't understand).

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I really need to dumb this down for some folks:

Question - Please choose your desired outcome of a Defensive play for your team:

A. Defender pressures QB, QB completes pass for 70 yards and a TD.

B. Defender pressures QB, QB throws an incompletion.

C. Defender sacks QB.  Offenses loses 8 yards.

I vote C.  Anyone want to disagree, and claim A or B is better?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I really need to dumb this down for some folks:
Question - Please choose your desired outcome of a Defensive play for your team:
A. Defender pressures QB, QB completes pass for 70 yards and a TD.
B. Defender pressures QB, QB throws an incompletion.
C. Defender sacks QB.  Offenses loses 8 yards.
I vote C.  Anyone want to disagree, and claim A or B is better?
 
Purely playing devil's advocate ...

A. Defender pressures QB, QB throws an INT which is returned for a TD
B. Defender sacks QB for a loss of 4 yards on the play

Context is also important. A third down pressure which forces an incompletion and a punt is far better than a 10 yard sack if the QB throws for 20 yards and a first down on the next play. Which we've seen way too many times.

Now I'm not expecting that there's a notably high % rate of pressures to INTs. Though I'd be interested to know if it's better than, worse than, or similar to the rate of fumble recoveries off of sacks. Might need to do some digging on that one.



Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Warfish said:

I'll take "Straw Man Arguments No One Has Actually Ever Made" for $1,000, Alex.

Of course Pressure "effects the game".

But simply citing "player X had a pressure" without citing the result of the play he had that pressure on is telling only half the story.

Once again, it's entirely possible (and the OP data shows that clearly) to have a defender get a "pressure" and the QB to still throw a 70 yard pass for a TD.  In such a case, did that "pressure" effect the play?  Yes.  Did that effect lead to a positive outcome?  Absolutely not.

It's funny how so many folks here just hate the whole story, and want to cherry pick partial "stats" trying to defend guys who don't complete enough sacks, lol.

Because a sack is definitive.  The completion percentage of sacks is 0.0%.  0 TD's.  0 Long Passes.

The argument that HAS been made is "Sacks > Pressures" and guys who get pressures without getting many sacks aren't as valuable as all that, especially without a detailed analysis of the results of those pressures.

Far too much nuance for this simplistic place, of course, lol.

From my side it was a joke. Sarcasm.  In response to @AFJF’s post.  
I could care less that you believe pressure doesn’t include sacks and that pressure has to lead to a negative play to be worthy of praise.  As if constant pressure without a sack or inc pass won’t lead to a bad play or changes to game plan, etc.

Didn’t need multiple posts trying to downplay the value of pressure vs sacks.  No shlt, really.  Doesn’t change the value of pressuring a QB.  

Regardless you missed the point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, jamesr said:

Purely playing devil's advocate ... emoji6.png

A. Defender pressures QB, QB throws an INT which is returned for a TD
B. Defender sacks QB for a loss of 4 yards on the play

Context is also important. A third down pressure which forces an incompletion and a punt is far better than a 10 yard sack if the QB throws for 20 yards and a first down on the next play. Which we've seen way too many times.

Now I'm not expecting that there's a notably high % rate of pressures to INTs. Though I'd be interested to know if it's better than, worse than, or similar to the rate of fumble recoveries off of sacks. Might need to do some digging on that one.



Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

Exactly!  It can work both ways.

A 'pressure' cited alone, without knowing the results of the play(s), is not enough info to judge it's worth/value.

  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GreenFish said:

Was there a recent  debate that brought this thread? Or is it the age old pressure vs. sack debate?

1 sack is better than than 1 pressure.

Pressures are important. Not sure anyone would say otherwise.

The question is how many pressures are needed to equate to 1 sack?

Which is better, 1 sack or 1 pressure that caused a pick 6 (scratch that), a pick?

Wait, which is more important, a sack fumble, or a pressure that creates a pick?

I guess a sack fumble is more points in fantasy, so I'll go with sack fumble.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hawk said:

Which is better, 1 sack or 1 pressure that caused a pick 6 (scratch that), a pick?

Wait, which is more important, a sack fumble, or a pressure that creates a pick?

I guess a sack fumble is more points in fantasy, so I'll go with sack fumble.

What about a sack vs a completion that came under pressure?

Or a sack vs a TD than came from a play where the QB was under pressure?

A pick under pressure is the only scenario where a pressure is likely more valuable than a sack.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...