maury77 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 To all the people criticizing this selection, what was your alternative plan? Start Brent Qvale? I saw some of his tape and it was very Adrien Clark-esque. You can't go into the NFL draft counting on getting a day 1 starter at a particular position when you are drafting at 20, there are too many variables. Let's say, hypothetically, that Tunsil, Stanley, Conklin & Decker are gone before pick 20 and one of the top 3 QBs and a pass rusher are available. Do you really want the Jets to have to reach for an OT at that point? That is not how you build a perennial winner. With the minimal cost involved (along with the modification of his existing contract), the Jets ABSOLUTELY had to make this trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 8 hours ago, Mike135 said: Don't think many would say Fitz was a "top QB" last season. Still a welcomed surprise at times, but overall, average QB at best. Depends on how you define "average" I suppose. Or what the alternative was otherwise.... Completions 14th (of 32 teams, of 44 QB's who threw over 100 attempts), Jets All Time #2 Yards 15th, Jets All Time #2 TD Passes, 10th, Jets All Time #1 Etc. Perhaps the problem here is we, as a fanbase, have been saddled with dogsh*t at QB for so long, that today's "average" looks great to some of our eyes. And we're not in a hurry to trade away average for yet more dogsh*t. Average is a hell of alot better than what we've had. Or what we will have with Geno Smith (or Mike "couldn't even start in Tampa" Glennon for that matter). But hey, lets keep deflecting away from the fact we just paid backup QB money to a guy whose only played 18 games in three season, and is in his 9th year as an O-lineman. I'm SURE there is no risk there, right? 8 hours ago, Mike135 said: We all hope Clady can bounce back. Well, we certainly have to hope that now. 8 hours ago, Mike135 said: The two season long injuries are scary, but other than those big ones, he seems to be pretty durable. Four years ago he was. Four years is an average career length in the NFL. 8 hours ago, Mike135 said: It's a feast or famine thing. Either he plays reliably week-in and week-out at an All Pro level, or he's out for seasons at a time. No, there is a host of ways he could fail. He could get hurt again. He could simply play poorly because all the miles and injuries have made him a ghost of what he was. It's most certainly not a All-Pro or Bust situation, a vs b. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 What is so hard for people to understand? Mac does not believe in having to count on rookies. He likes walking into the draft with all positions covered (this is why I have no doubt there's a handshake agreement with Fitz in place). This enables him to draft BPA, period. Get used to it, that's his modus operandi. You may not like it, but it speaks to finally having a GM who is going to having a plan and a list of contingencies in place. I love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPitch Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 6 hours ago, Powpow said: Yea its better to just go with 10 players and leave the LT position unguarded. youve added yet another old man to your roster. plus hes injury prone. good luck with that. we should be getting younger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetster Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 9 minutes ago, maury77 said: To all the people criticizing this selection, what was your alternative plan? Start Brent Qvale? I saw some of his tape and it was very Adrien Clark-esque. You can't go into the NFL draft counting on getting a day 1 starter at a particular position when you are drafting at 20, there are too many variables. Let's say, hypothetically, that Tunsil, Stanley, Conklin & Decker are gone before pick 20 and one of the top 3 QBs and a pass rusher are available. Do you really want the Jets to have to reach for an OT at that point? That is not how you build a perennial winner. With the minimal cost involved (along with the modification of his existing contract), the Jets ABSOLUTELY had to make this trade. Plus if he proves to be healthy, has a great season & with Harris contract off the books, who cares that your giving your starting LT, that's top 5 in the league 10 million? Not me, for gods sake we're paying Harris, a 2 down LB that kind of money right now. The Jets have ALWAYS overpaid for blah positions for whatever reasons. New Orleans won a Super Bowl with our castoff center Goodwin. I love Mangold & he's been a great Jet, but as long as we're paying our Center & our 2 down MLB like top 53 roster money we ain't winning diddley poo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 13 minutes ago, Sperm Edwards said: Understood, but it's a lot easier/convenient for fans to say maximum on-paper efficiency suggests we tank every season until there's a worthy QB on the team. Not so easy to do to when you're the GM. As far as this 5th rounder: 1. A 5th rounder is easy to recover with an insignificant trade-back. 2. If we keep Clady as a 2 year starter it's worth that level trade down, but even without doing that the net gain may still be nothing. If we don't exercise his option because the money is too high, he becomes a UFA, and we'd be in line for probably a 5th round compensatory pick after someone else signs him. It turns out the Jets received Denvers 1st Seventh Rd. pick (#228) in the deal. The differential in Draft value pts. is 26. Per DraftTek http://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp ROUND 1 ROUND 2 ROUND 3 ROUND 4 ROUND 5 ROUND 6 ROUND 7 PK/TM VALUE PK/TM VALUE PK/TM VALUE PK/TM VALUE PK/TM VALUE PK/TM VALUE PK/TM VALUE 1 TEN 3000 32 CLE 590 64 TEN 270 99 CLE 104 140 TEN 35.5 176 CLE 20.6 222 TEN 2.6 2 CLE 2600 33 TEN 580 65 CLE 265 100 PHI 100 141 CLE 35 177 TEN 20.2 223 CLE 2.5 3 SD 2200 34 DAL 560 66 SD 260 101 DAL 96 142 SF 34.5 178 SF 19.8 224 SD 2.4 4 DAL 1800 35 SD 550 67 DAL 255 102 SD 92 143 OAK 34 179 SD 19.4 225 SEA 2.3 5 JAX 1700 36 BAL 540 68 SF 250 103 JAX 88 144 DEN 33.5 180 MIN 19.0 226 JAX 2.2 6 BAL 1600 37 SF 530 69 JAX 245 104 BAL 86 145 SF 33 181 JAX 18.6 227 MIA 2.1 7 SF 1500 38 JAX 520 70 BAL 240 105 SF 84 146 JAX 32.6 182 BAL 18.2 228 NYJ 2.0 8 PHI 1400 39 TB 510 71 NYG 235 106 CHI 82 147 MIA 32.2 183 TB 17.8 229 PIT 1.9 9 TB 1350 40 NYG 500 72 CHI 230 107 MIA 80 148 TB 31.8 184 NYG 17.4 230 CHI 1.8 10 NYG 1300 41 CHI 490 73 MIA 225 108 TB 78 149 NYG 31.4 185 CHI 17.0 231 MIA 1.7 11 CHI 1250 42 MIA 480 74 TB 220 109 NYG 76 150 CHI 31 186 MIA 16.6 232 WAS 1.6 12 NO 1200 43 LA 470 75 OAK 215 110 LA 74 151 DET 30.6 187 WAS 16.2 233 PHI 1.5 13 MIA 1150 44 OAK 460 76 LA 210 111 DET 72 152 NO 30.2 188 PHI 15.8 234 OAK 1.4 14 OAK 1100 45 LA 450 77 PHI 205 112 NO 70 153 PHI 29.8 189 DAL 15.4 235 DEN 1.3 15 LA 1050 46 DET 440 78 NO 200 113 TEN 68 154 OAK 29.4 190 LA 15.0 236 DET 1.2 16 DET 1000 47 NO 430 79 PHI 195 114 OAK 66 155 IND 29 191 DET 14.6 237 NO 1.1 17 ATL 950 48 IND 420 80 BUF 190 115 ATL 64 156 BUF 28.6 192 BUF 14.2 238 ATL 1.0 18 IND 900 49 BUF 410 81 ATL 185 116 IND 62 157 DEN 28.2 193 TEN 13.8 239 IND 1.0 19 BUF 875 50 ATL 400 82 IND 180 117 BUF 60 158 HOU 27.8 194 OAK 13.4 240 MIN 1.0 20 NYJ 850 51 NYJ 390 83 NYJ 175 118 NYJ 58 159 WAS 27.4 195 HOU 13.0 241 NYJ 1.0 21 WAS 800 52 HOU 380 84 WAS 170 119 HOU 56 160 MIN 27 196 NE 12.6 242 WAS 1.0 22 HOU 780 53 WAS 370 85 HOU 165 120 WAS 54 161 CIN 26.6 197 TB 12.2 243 NE 1.0 23 MIN 760 54 MIN 360 86 MIN 160 121 MIN 52 162 KC 26.2 198 SD 11.8 244 MIN 1.0 24 CIN 740 55 CIN 350 87 CIN 155 122 CIN 50 163 GB 25.8 199 CIN 11.4 245 CIN 1.0 25 PIT 720 56 SEA 340 88 GB 150 123 PIT 49 164 PHI 25.4 200 GB 11.0 246 PIT 1.0 26 SEA 700 57 GB 330 89 PIT 145 124 SEA 48 165 KC 25 201 JAX 10.6 247 SEA 1.0 27 GB 680 58 PIT 320 90 SEA 140 125 GB 47 166 HOU 24.6 202 DET 10.2 248 GB 1.0 28 KC 660 59 KC 310 91 NE 136 126 KC 46 167 ARI 24.2 203 KC 9.8 249 KC 1.0 29 ARI 640 60 NE 300 92 ARI 132 127 CHI 45 168 CAR 23.8 204 NE 9.4 250 NE 1.0 30 CAR 620 61 NE 292 93 CAR 128 128 ARI 44 169 DET 23.4 205 ARI 9.0 251 PHI 1.0 31 DEN 600 62 CAR 284 94 DEN 124 129 CAR 43 170 ARI C 23 206 CHI 8.6 252 CAR 1.0 63 DEN 276 95 DET C 120 130 BAL 42 171 SEA C 22.6 207 SF 8.2 253 DEN 1.0 96 NE C 116 131 GB C 41 172 CLE C 22.2 208 NE C 7.8 97 SEA C 112 132 BAL C 40 173 CLE C 21.8 209 BAL C 7.4 98 DEN C 108 133 SF C 39 174 SF C 21.4 210 DET C 7 134 BAL C 38.5 175 SD C 21 211 SF C 6.6 135 DAL C 38.5 212 DAL C 6.2 136 DEN C 37.5 213 SF C 5.8 137 GB C 37 214 NE C 5.4 138 CLE C 36.5 215 SEA C 5 139 BUF C 36 216 DAL C 4.6 217 DAL C 4.2 218 BUF C 3.8 219 DEN C 3.4 220 PIT C 3 221 NE C 2.8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 youve added yet another old man to your roster. plus hes injury prone. good luck with that. we should be getting younger If Mac was such a genius as many have claimed in this thread, then he would have found a stud LT for the next 10-12 years in the upcoming draft. All he did was apply another band aid approach by giving up a draft pick and acquiring an aging, injury prone LT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 11 hours ago, Doggin94it said: By the way, waiting on confirmation from Jason, but I'd bet that Clady's total 2016 cap hit is only 3M, not 6 - because if that remaining 3M is tied to Clady's health via per-active-game bonuses (what I'd expect given his injury history), then those bonuses are probably considered Non-likely to be earned incentives, which do not count against this year's cap, and only count against next year's cap. I think it's that the $6M is for this year with bonus on top of that. The amount above $6M is what would hit in 2017. The $3M figure seems to just be in there to prevent us from cutting him for nothing by August (in case we draft a left tackle in 2 weeks, for example), leaving him out in the cold as a FA when everyone else has addressed his position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 One thing you're seeing is that big Jets moves like Clady are not being leaked. We are being hit with this stuff without a lot of pre notice. In Clady's case there might have been a few articles speculating that Clady was available and the Jets "should" be interested but no bonafide tips or leaks. And the usual suspects Mehta and Cimini do not seem to be in the mix anymore. So you'd have to think that whatever happens to our Qb situation there will not be very much advance notice. Mac has cleaned up the Jets front office! And the circus left last year and went to Buffalo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section314 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 4 minutes ago, PatsFanTX said: If Mac was such a genius as many have claimed in this thread, then he would have found a stud LT for the next 10-12 years in the upcoming draft. All he did was apply another band aid approach by giving up a draft pick and acquiring an aging, injury prone LT. You've seen the draft results already? Don't keep us in suspense...who did we get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 19 minutes ago, PatsFanTX said: If Mac was such a genius as many have claimed in this thread, then he would have found a stud LT for the next 10-12 years in the upcoming draft. All he did was apply another band aid approach by giving up a draft pick and acquiring an aging, injury prone LT. So he shouldn't be Proactive in getting a vet on a 1 yr deal before the draft so in case ALL the Top 3 or 4 OT are gone by the Jets pick? I can see that your definition of "Genius" is fraught withstupidity. Bellicheat gave up a promising yound DE for a "Jag" OG Mac gets a 2x All-Pro for $4m less than he was due on a 1 yr. deal and a 5th for 7th trade...... With your logic= Pats Win Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 24 minutes ago, Jetlag said: What is so hard for people to understand? Mac does not believe in having to count on rookies. He likes walking into the draft with all positions covered (this is why I have no doubt there's a handshake agreement with Fitz in place). This enables him to draft BPA, period. Get used to it, that's his modus operandi. You may not like it, but it speaks to finally having a GM who is going to having a plan and a list of contingencies in place. I love it. If he keeps doing this sh*t (and doesn't find a QB), it actually speaks to a GM that's going to necessitate an Idzik-level slash-and-burn job to fix his mess. Btw, for the "lol ya rite Macca is Tannenbaum FOH brah" crowd: the bold is a pretty apt description of Mike Tannenbaum's team-building philosophy, and it's precisely how the team got to be both bad and expensive by 2012, not to mention how he got fired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTL Jet Fan Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 8 minutes ago, PatsFanTX said: If Mac was such a genius as many have claimed in this thread, then he would have found a stud LT for the next 10-12 years in the upcoming draft. All he did was apply another band aid approach by giving up a draft pick and acquiring an aging, injury prone LT. Like it is so easy to find a Stud LT in draft when you pick at 20. The draft didn't hasn't even happened yet, why don't you wait before you judge. What would you have done if you were the Jets GM go into the draft with no LT, so all the other teams no exactly what u need. It also leave the possibility of coming away with squat. This was the right move at the right time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 The Clady signing is a 3 million dollar gamble. I don't know the ramifications on paying him if he's injured during training camp. Or never takes a snap for the Jets. If they can release him or do an injury settlement. But the team thinks he is worth it based on his previous performance as an elite OT. And I guess he passed his physical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 11 minutes ago, Rangers9 said: One thing you're seeing is that big Jets moves like Clady are not being leaked. We are being hit with this stuff without a lot of pre notice. In Clady's case there might have been a few articles speculating that Clady was available and the Jets "should" be interested but no bonafide tips or leaks. And the usual suspects Mehta and Cimini do not seem to be in the mix anymore. So you'd have to think that whatever happens to our Qb situation there will not be very much advance notice. Mac has cleaned up the Jets front office! And the circus left last year and went to Buffalo. The fact that Clady had a visit to 1 Jets Drive and nobody knew about it is "Dome of Silence" perfection! Woody and Bowles discuss the trade! LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohio State NY Jets fan Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 10 minutes ago, Rangers9 said: One thing you're seeing is that big Jets moves like Clady are not being leaked. We are being hit with this stuff without a lot of pre notice. In Clady's case there might have been a few articles speculating that Clady was available and the Jets "should" be interested but no bonafide tips or leaks. And the usual suspects Mehta and Cimini do not seem to be in the mix anymore. So you'd have to think that whatever happens to our Qb situation there will not be very much advance notice. Mac has cleaned up the Jets front office! And the circus left last year and went to Buffalo. Agree, amazing that it seems Clady was in FP taking a physical on Friday, stayed over night to finalize the deal and news did not break until the deal was filed with the NFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Just now, dbatesman said: If he keeps doing this sh*t (and doesn't find a QB), it actually speaks to a GM that's going to necessitate an Idzik-level slash-and-burn job to fix his mess. Btw, for the "lol ya rite Macca is Tannenbaum FOH brah" crowd, the bold is a prettt apt description of Mike Tannenbaum's team-building philosophy, and it's precisely how the team got to be both bad and expensive by 2012, not to mention how he got fired. Except Tannenbaum didn't have the scouting chops to follow through with the draft to replenish the teams more expensive pieces. I guess we will find out if Mac does. Tannenbaum was always about the big splash but if that fell through never had a back up. Mac seems more methodical and thought out. Who knows, maybe that's just what I want to believe. For right now the only move that seems to be biting him a little bit is that Revis contract. I will cut him some slack seeing as it was his first year and CB was a position of dire need AND he had an entire fanbase whom he just met SCREAMING for Revis to be resigned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 39 minutes ago, maury77 said: To all the people criticizing this selection, what was your alternative plan? Start Brent Qvale? I saw some of his tape and it was very Adrien Clark-esque. You can't go into the NFL draft counting on getting a day 1 starter at a particular position when you are drafting at 20, there are too many variables. Let's say, hypothetically, that Tunsil, Stanley, Conklin & Decker are gone before pick 20 and one of the top 3 QBs and a pass rusher are available. Do you really want the Jets to have to reach for an OT at that point? That is not how you build a perennial winner. With the minimal cost involved (along with the modification of his existing contract), the Jets ABSOLUTELY had to make this trade. To me there are 2 QBs worth considering. If Macc drafts Pax Lynch I'll call for Woody to bring back Idzik. Then again I'm usually wrong about QBs so it'll probably be a good thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Blast Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 50 minutes ago, Thor99 said: Until the Jets start figuring out the draft, this is what we're stuck with. Last year Mac was forced to rely on Idzik's scouts since he was hired too close to the draft to turn over the scouting staff. This year will be the first draft with his scouting choices in place. It will be interesting to see (over time) if his guys help to improve our draft selections. Here's to hoping! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 4 minutes ago, 32EBoozer said: The fact that Clady had a visitto 1 Jets Drive and nobody knew about it is "Dome of Silence" perfection! Woody and Bowles discuss the trade! LOL. Wasnt it the "cone" of silence. In any case, hilarious!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 9 minutes ago, dbatesman said: If he keeps doing this sh*t (and doesn't find a QB), it actually speaks to a GM that's going to necessitate an Idzik-level slash-and-burn job to fix his mess. Btw, for the "lol ya rite Macca is Tannenbaum FOH brah" crowd: the bold is a pretty apt description of Mike Tannenbaum's team-building philosophy, and it's precisely how the team got to be both bad and expensive by 2012, not to mention how he got fired. You're right in that if Mac blows it on signing a Qb (imo esp Fitz) and that translates into losses there will be no mercy from Jets fans. They will be flying airplanes over Met Life. But there were a few tip offs although no leaks. Recently Marshall told the media that he asked Bowles what's going on with re-signing Fitz. And Bowles told him not to worry it's going to happen. Now this is what Marshall said not the Jets FO. And word from the media after Brick announced his retirement was that he was asked to take a pay cut and was told the money would be used to re-sign Fitz. If true he obviously didn't go along with it. He wanted the money in his pocket not Fitz's . But with all this cap adjustment etc going on and possibly other players restructuring it could be just a matter of time. And Fitz isn't going crazy about this. He seems like a guy who isn't worried and maybe knows what's going to eventually happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Like it is so easy to find a Stud LT in draft when you pick at 20. The draft didn't hasn't even happened yet, why don't you wait before you judge. What would you have done if you were the Jets GM go into the draft with no LT, so all the other teams no exactly what u need. It also leave the possibility of coming away with squat. This was the right move at the right time. You are missing my point. Jets LT decides to retire leaving a gaping hole on the most important position on the Oline. MAC addresses the situation and fills the position with the best option available. Any of the other 31 GM's would have done the same thing. This move was out of necessity, and not some shrewd move by a savvy GM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohio State NY Jets fan Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 8 minutes ago, dbatesman said: If he keeps doing this sh*t (and doesn't find a QB), it actually speaks to a GM that's going to necessitate an Idzik-level slash-and-burn job to fix his mess. Btw, for the "lol ya rite Macca is Tannenbaum FOH brah" crowd, the bold is a prettt apt description of Mike Tannenbaum's team-building philosophy, and it's precisely how the team got to be both bad and expensive by 2012, not to mention how he got fired. Good point, I think one major difference is shorter deals with escape options (helped with Cro, not so much with Fitz) As TT stated above; time will tell on the contribution of draft selections Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 4 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said: Wasnt it the "cone" of silence. In any case, hilarious!! My Bad.... you're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 4 minutes ago, PatsFanTX said: You are missing my point. Jets LT decides to retire leaving a gaping hole on the most important position on the Oline. MAC addresses the situation and fills the position with the best option available. Any of the other 31 GM's would have done the same thing. This move was out of necessity, and not some shrewd move by a savvy GM. Clady has been out there a while and available and there are plenty of NFL teams who need a good LT. So you can't not give credit to Mac. And he got a better O-lineman than Belichick got from the Cardinals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRL Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 55 minutes ago, maury77 said: To all the people criticizing this selection, what was your alternative plan? Start Brent Qvale? I saw some of his tape and it was very Adrien Clark-esque. You can't go into the NFL draft counting on getting a day 1 starter at a particular position when you are drafting at 20, there are too many variables. Let's say, hypothetically, that Tunsil, Stanley, Conklin & Decker are gone before pick 20 and one of the top 3 QBs and a pass rusher are available. Do you really want the Jets to have to reach for an OT at that point? That is not how you build a perennial winner. With the minimal cost involved (along with the modification of his existing contract), the Jets ABSOLUTELY had to make this trade. People are complaining about the trade because there are no "stats" or "YouTube videos" associated with OLinemen. Therefore people are in an uproar because he's been injured recently. Yes that's a concern BUT people are totally overlooking the potentially MASSIVE upgrade at the position. People didn't complain as much when we got Marshall because they were able to look at his "stats" and see what his production was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 1 hour ago, Miss Lonelyhearts said: That simply isn't true. Draft picks help the team merely by being used. I apologize, I thought we were talking about the Marshall trade specifically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 1 minute ago, KRL said: People are complaining about the trade because there are no "stats" or "YouTube videos" associated with OLinemen. Therefore people are in an uproar because he's been injured recently. Yes that's a concern BUT people are totally overlooking the potentially MASSIVE upgrade at the position. People didn't complain as much when we got Marshall because they were able to look at his "stats" and see what his production was If healthy, Jet fans will immediately see the benefit of Clady over Brick! Fitz and the entire Offense will benefit from this move.... if he remains healthy. Having an extra second or 2 will make a huge difference to the passing game and being a better Run Blocker than Brick will help the running game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Blast Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 31 minutes ago, dbatesman said: If he keeps doing this sh*t (and doesn't find a QB), it actually speaks to a GM that's going to necessitate an Idzik-level slash-and-burn job to fix his mess. Btw, for the "lol ya rite Macca is Tannenbaum FOH brah" crowd: the bold is a pretty apt description of Mike Tannenbaum's team-building philosophy, and it's precisely how the team got to be both bad and expensive by 2012, not to mention how he got fired. It seems to me that Mac is trying his best to field a competitive team while building for the future. When he took over there was little if any depth in most positions. That is something that will take at least 3 or 4... or maybe even 5 years to correct through the draft. So then the question becomes, how does one field a decent team in the interim, while trying to build through the draft? His solution is to plug in some free agents and trades to fill the holes, even if they are older. BUT... he has been getting draft picks back in these trades (albeit lower ones, but still bodies) AND... the contracts with these guys have been low risk and short term, so as not to tie up the future. For those reasons, I disagree with your premise that this will lead to a gutting and total rebuild. I think his philosophy is right on target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 29 minutes ago, dbatesman said: If he keeps doing this sh*t (and doesn't find a QB), it actually speaks to a GM that's going to necessitate an Idzik-level slash-and-burn job to fix his mess. Btw, for the "lol ya rite Macca is Tannenbaum FOH brah" crowd: the bold is a pretty apt description of Mike Tannenbaum's team-building philosophy, and it's precisely how the team got to be both bad and expensive by 2012, not to mention how he got fired. Finding a QB is what he's trying to do, not overpaying for one is being avoided so it seems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 Clady and Carpenter on the "Blind Side" will give Fitz no more "Fits" at night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 this is a lateral move at best ... a disaster at worst Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 3 minutes ago, 32EBoozer said: If healthy, Jet fans will immediately see the benefit of Clady over Brick! Fitz and the entire Offense will benefit from this move.... if he remains healthy. Having an extra second or 2 will make a huge difference to the passing game and being a better Run Blocker than Brick will help the running game. Why do you speak using Fitzpatrick as the QB he is not a member of this team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolot Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 I'm fine with the move , but to act like this is some huge upgrade over Brick is absurd . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Brown Posted April 10, 2016 Share Posted April 10, 2016 1 minute ago, KRL said: People are complaining about the trade because there are no "stats" or "YouTube videos" associated with OLinemen. Therefore people are in an uproar because he's been injured recently. Yes that's a concern BUT people are totally overlooking the potentially MASSIVE upgrade at the position. People didn't complain as much when we got Marshall because they were able to look at his "stats" and see what his production was You are right but there were people complaining about the Marshall trade. In fact one poster yesterday said seeing how Marshall played it was still a bad trade!!! Some who are against this trade seem to yearn for the days when the Jets openly misled players, had the Clarkes, Vlads and turnstile Hunters on the team with a FO that assured us year after year after year that these guys were "really good you know" and who couldn't wait to leak their every move so that they could see their. names the next day in the paper. I for one am glad that we no longer have FO like that. We have to wait for the results for sure but you can't in good conscious knock the effort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.