Augustiniak Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 Just now, joewilly12 said: So how do we FIX the QB situation here not PATCH it. draft well and develop better. two things tanny's regime didn't do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 If this were the jets, you would be advising site owners "not to get their panties' in a bunch" based on your flaming. I don't use that phrase anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Mart Posted April 20, 2016 Author Share Posted April 20, 2016 25 minutes ago, Scott Dierking said: Well, last year they gave away a #2 in order to exchange Bradford for Foles. This year they created an expensive bridge in Bradford and the contract they gave him. They also signed a back-up to pretty good money (12 mill guaranteed). Now they have yielded more picks, for an unknown. If this were the jets, you would be advising site owners "not to get their panties' in a bunch" based on your flaming. I get what you're saying. Just remember. Two different regimes / decision makers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BklynJetsFan85 Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 1 minute ago, joewilly12 said: So how do we FIX the QB situation here not PATCH it. Sometimes the QBs are there - sometimes they aint - but you don't trade up to number 1 or 2 unless you are 99.9% sure you are drafting a franchise QB - not a maybe he will be good or a guy that "he will be great if he sits a year" - because that means he's not NFL ready and why the heck would you trade your future for that??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 6 minutes ago, C Mart said: I get what you're saying. Just remember. Two different regimes / decision makers. Still the same team,and it does not disguise what they have spent to get what may be their future qb. They had better hit big here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 Signs are pointing towards Glennon with the top 2 QB's gone and still no where close with Fitz lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BklynJetsFan85 Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 1 minute ago, Patriot Killa said: Signs are pointing towards Glennon with the top 2 QB's gone and still no where close with Fitz lol wouldn't mind giving up a 3rd for him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 chase daniel will be iggles starting Qb while wentz rides the pine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 i like how Jets fans with no starter, no reliable backup and probably no future (pending Petty) are sh*tting all over the Eagles who have a starter, a reliable backup and, soon, the future. We sit here and debate Fitz vs Hoyer. the joke's on us. quarterback is the most important position on the field, by far. And every year it gets more important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 bradford could also be a bronco. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 13 minutes ago, PatsFanTX said: I don't use that phrase anymore. You mentioned drafting DL and CB. Do the names Ras-I-Dowling and Easley mean anything to you? And no you can't use Tom Brady's presence as an excuse because that was not in your original statement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 As for the Patriots, they will probably win another Super Bowl but in terms of legacy, the time it took them to do it and the cheating allegations, fair or not, will rank them below the great dynasties. And if one uses winning the division so many times, congratulations, you're the Atlanta Braves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 And if one uses winning the division so many times, congratulations, you're the Atlanta Braves The Pats have won 4 Super Bowl titles in 15 years. How many World Series titles did the Braves win in 15 years? Really stupid argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 1 hour ago, Integrity28 said: I can't believe these trade-ups for QBs that don't come close to previous years QBs and guys that may not be able to start until their 2nd year. The one thing that's beneficial to the Jets is there will be 2 less teams looking for a young Franchise QB next yr. Seriously, how many teams will trade up for the kid from Clemson, or any of the others. maybe Cleveland or SF next yr if these 2 or Dallas don't take Lynch. If we go 4-12 this yr. we are a lock come next yr to get a young stud! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 crazycarl told me its for jaylon smith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 9 minutes ago, PatsFanTX said: The Pats have won 4 Super Bowl titles in 15 years. How many World Series titles did the Braves win in 15 years? Really stupid argument. What I meant was its someone were to use the argument that the Pats dominated their division to elevate them amongst the dynasties, then that is the response Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggin94it Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 at this point, these trades will force the hand of the next qb desperate team. i wonder if it's the jets. No reason it would be. None of the teams that moved leapfrogged the jets, so they're still in the same position in terms of teams likely picking qbs ahead of them. None of lynch, wentz & goff were ever getting past the Rams Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 1 minute ago, Doggin94it said: No reason it would be. None of the teams that moved leapfrogged the jets, so they're still in the same position in terms of teams likely picking qbs ahead of them. None of lynch, wentz & goff were ever getting past the Rams Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk true. but SF and cleveland pick 7/8, and there's now the reality that another team will give up a lot to trade up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRy56 Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 Will the Browns turn around and flip next years first for Mike Glennon? #TheFuture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggin94it Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 My understanding is that none of these QBs are deemed 'can't miss' prospects. The Browns made a great trade if they don't feel strongly about any of them. Sure, that leaves them with McCown next year, but it also leaves them with two picks in the 1st round next year that are likely in the top half of the draft. Hell, they could get the #1 overall next year, and get their QB then, and if they don't get #1, they have the ammo to get there. That future 1 from the Eagles is likely late in the first round, but yes, they must not like the two top guys much if they made this deal. My strong suspicion is they'll regret it down the road Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 Oy Vey the Eagles are dumb you blow up the market with that retarded Sam Bradford contract and now you trade the farm to move up 6 spots? Lmfao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 They gave up a sh*tload to move up just a few spots. The GM's an idiot. On a good note at least I don't have to read about the Jets moving up anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 1 hour ago, joewilly12 said: Trade Mo for a bunch of nobodies guys that usually dont even wind up on the roster, no thanks. Actually, Real Joe Namath, first and second round picks contribute on most teams, perhaps even this one if the brass is what I think they are. Are you proposing we DON'T trade Mo? (Don't answer, I don't care) but be prepared for a rude awakening come draft weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogglez Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 22 minutes ago, Doggin94it said: No reason it would be. None of the teams that moved leapfrogged the jets, so they're still in the same position in terms of teams likely picking qbs ahead of them. None of lynch, wentz & goff were ever getting past the Rams Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk With the Browns still being a QB needy team you could see all three of these guys go in the top ten. Barring a trade up, I think we should all get cozy with the idea of us reaching for Connor Cook or Christian Hackenberg in the first two rounds. The Eagles, with their stupidity, absolutely f*cked us today if our plan was to get one of the big three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Louie Jet Fan Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 5 minutes ago, New York Mick said: On a good note at least I don't have to read about the Jets moving up anymore. Possibly. If Mac still thinks Lynch is worth it they might make a move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowlesMovement Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 30 minutes ago, PatsFanTX said: The Pats have won 4 Super Bowl titles in 15 years. How many World Series titles did the Braves win in 15 years? Really stupid argument. We also don't have any proof the Braves cheated, the Pats have not won one SB without cheating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cant wait Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 1 hour ago, Sperm Edwards said: No, it isn't. He only gets the franchise tag if he's healthy AND if he's awesome. Since those two things aren't happening, he's not getting tagged. The contract was mindless, which is why it made everyone's jaw drop, prior to pointing and laughing, only to be outdone by signing Chase Daniels to a contract that would have paid him $15M if Bradford's injury occurred in the preseason (or if he beat out Bradford for the job outright). They may have overpaid, depending on your valuation of Bradford, but he's still a young player with upside and gives the team the flexibility to develop their young QB at their own pace. Best case scenario, Bradford has a good year, wentz looks ready and now they have a tradeable asset to get back picks next year. High risk/high reward but I'd be excited if I was an eagles fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetdawgg Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 2 hours ago, KRL said: Exactly!!! Two dumb and desperate teams (HOU & PHI) paid outrageous $$$ to unproven QB's and have totally screwed up the salary market. And now PHI has to pay through the nose for a QB who isn't a definite to be the next Luck or Manning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 this tells you all you need to know about this years QB class Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 We also don't have any proof the Braves cheated, the Pats have not won one SB without cheating And the Jets haven't even played in one in 47 years. You must be very proud of your team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 32 minutes ago, New York Mick said: They gave up a sh*tload to move up just a few spots. The GM's an idiot. On a good note at least I don't have to read about the Jets moving up anymore. Yes pls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 4 minutes ago, PatsFanTX said: And the Jets haven't even played in one in 47 years. You must be very proud of your team. Very insightful 15,000,000th post on a board of a team ur not even a fan of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 16 minutes ago, Larz said: this tells you all you need to know about this years QB class The Eagles and Rams arent exactly the best run organizations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 1 hour ago, PatsFanTX said: The Pats have won 4 Super Bowl titles in 15 years. How many World Series titles did the Braves win in 15 years? Really stupid argument. Perhaps they should have cheated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted April 20, 2016 Share Posted April 20, 2016 36 minutes ago, Greenseed4 said: Actually, Real Joe Namath, first and second round picks contribute on most teams, perhaps even this one if the brass is what I think they are. Are you proposing we DON'T trade Mo? (Don't answer, I don't care) but be prepared for a rude awakening come draft weekend. Stephen Hill,Vernon Gholston,Quinton Coples.Vlad DuCasse,Jalen Saunders,Kyle Wilson all say hello. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.