TuscanyTile2 Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 I think almost all of us would (and Maccagnan and almost every GM would), that means we went from a QB we booed out of town to an even worse QB. We'd be fortunate to be able to bring back the guy who butt-fumbled on national TV over the guy we've got now. Crazy to think about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet9 Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 No. I know exactly what I'm getting with Sanchez. I'm 95% sure what I'm getting with Geno. They both suck, but I'm reluctantly willing to give Geno a few starts under a new regime. That said, I don't want Geno as our starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 zomg YES Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 2X on $unday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Better2bgreenthanblue Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 But Genos last game was Purfect! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Hypothetically, this thread makes my dick itch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 The only starting QB worse then Sanchez is Geno Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flushing Roots Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Next question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 I would , if only to see how he plans on topping the butt fumble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obrien2Toon Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 I would also choose piss over urine if you happen to be wondering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 I would also choose piss over urine if you happen to be wondering. I like poopoo over doodoo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 I like poopoo over doodoo. I like chicken over poultry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyLV Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 No way. Geno may suck, but he is better than Sanchez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Wanting Sanchez back is one of the more imbecilic things I have read in recent weeks. And there have been many... Geno still has room to improve. I am not optimistic about his progress but have not thrown in the towel on him just yet. That said, I would still take Mariota if there isnt a big deal on the table. I know exactly what Mark is. A serviceable backup, if he has a quality cast around him, that will always commit awful turnovers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryK Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Look at us. We're like kids playing in a junkyard, turning over the same rusty broken toys hoping *this* time they'll work. Sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Would depend if we got Chip Kelly's system as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Only if the mudball wrapped in tinfoil and skate key were now off the table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section314 Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 That's like asking if you would rather get a ride home on the Titanic or the Hindenberg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Aids or Ebola, nice choice. If I had to pick one or the other, I'd pick Sanchez, barely. If managed right, I think he can win and produce at a slightly better level than Smith. But really, that's a choice between stepping in dogsh*t or stepping in horse sh*t. Either way, it's sh*t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slowmoe57 Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Would you prefer a kick in the balls or a kick in the nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Someone else said it here, sanchez is going to buffalo. Oh man it will be fun to watch the band back together upstate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Had Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Bring back Buttfumble! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Embrace the Suck Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 I think almost all of us would (and Maccagnan and almost every GM would), You are sorely mistaken. Why would I or our GM want mark back? He sucks that was established over the four years he was here. He didn't prove anything with the eagles either. In fact mark was so bad with the Jets that he jaded most of the fan base towards any young QB we have or will have. It's funny, Mark at best was average and people still think he's this misunderstood star just waiting to blossom. G Smith had two or three weeks his rookie year before most of those same people for whom mark could do no wrong were calling for G Smith to be cut. I'm not saying Geno is the guy I'm just saying Mark certainly isn't. Nothing Geno has done comes close to surpassing the ultimate embarrassing moment in sports known as The Butt Fumble. At least Geno is still on his inexpensive rookie contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loluchka80 Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 no way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 No This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 I think Geno stinks, and I would not trade him for Sanchez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyjet Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 I would take Sanchez in a blink of an eye over geno. But then again I'd take 30 other qbs over geno, maybe 46 other qbs over geno. But I don't want Winston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyjet Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 The only starting QB worse then Sanchez is Geno Nailed it..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 FOH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanatic Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 I think almost all of us would (and Maccagnan and almost every GM would), that means we went from a QB we booed out of town to an even worse QB. We'd be fortunate to be able to bring back the guy who butt-fumbled on national TV over the guy we've got now. Crazy to think about. No I wouldn't. Geno has a higher upside and hasn't played long enough to make a final determination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Been there done that. Nooooo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freemanm Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 That would be even dumber than the move Bradway made a few years ago, when he let Lavernues Coles sign with the Redskins, developed Santana Moss into a great receiver, and then traded Moss for Coles a few seasons later.m Bottom line: Geno does play very well at times, Sanchez doesn't. No way I'd make that trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashmouth Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 Sanchez - 9 games 198 / 309 64.1 % 14 TD 11 INT 2400 yds Geno - 14 games 219/367 59 % 13 TD 13 Ints 2500 yds First of all this trade would never happen because no one in their right mind would ever trade for Geno Smith. Sanchez will get some interest from other teams if Philly wants to move him. I think if he does get a chance to play a full season in Philly he could approach the 30 TD mark but that improvement would have to go along with him cutting out the stupid turnovers and that's whats plagued Mark his entire career. Sanchez has shown Improvement with a better supporting cast and his Comp. percentage has gone up almost 10 points in a better offensive system so hes not as inaccurate as some Jets fans would have you believe. That being said both QB's kill themselves with stupid turnovers and very well might continue too. Having to make a decision on the 2 its easily Sanchez anyone saying Geno is nuts since Sanchez has some nice playoff exp. and has shown at times to be a clutch performer in the playoffs/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashmouth Posted February 20, 2015 Share Posted February 20, 2015 That would be even dumber than the move Bradway made a few years ago, when he let Lavernues Coles sign with the Redskins, developed Santana Moss into a great receiver, and then traded Moss for Coles a few seasons later.m Bottom line: Geno does play very well at times, Sanchez doesn't. No way I'd make that trade. Wait what ?? Geno plays well at times but Sanchez doesn't ? Sanchez had some fantastic games this season and in prior seasons I don't remember Geno ever having a fantastic game some good ones yes but never fantastic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.