Barry McCockinner Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RutgersJetFan Posted January 23 Popular Post Share Posted January 23 WOW that is certainly JUICY 1 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post jetspenguin Posted January 23 Popular Post Share Posted January 23 Any rumors this early I'm not believing...especially a trade down without knowing who is available at the spot we are currently at.Sent from the FOREVER AND EVER Suicide Watch desk. 8 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post T0mShane Posted January 23 Popular Post Share Posted January 23 May as well. At 10 and with no need for one of the top defensive players, you’re drafting a second round talent anyway. 8 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenFish Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 He learned from last year not to tip his hand. So he’s blowing smoke early this year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Warfish Posted January 23 Popular Post Share Posted January 23 JD trading down won;t surprise me at all. Will make drafting a bendy Edge at ~#23 who'll need several seasons and huge workouts to get game-ready much more reasonable in his eyes. 3 2 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 If the top two tackles are gone I could see it OR if a QB unexpectedly falls to our spot. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rochester Jets Posted January 23 Popular Post Share Posted January 23 We don’t currently have a 2nd round pick so maybe trading down nets a late first and a second? Not a terrible idea considering there are some big holes to fill. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sammybighead Posted January 23 Popular Post Share Posted January 23 Even if JD went on this guys podcast and announced he will trade down, it's meaningless until we're in that moment and there's an actual partner wanting to trade up. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Barry McCockinner Posted January 23 Author Popular Post Share Posted January 23 3 minutes ago, Sammybighead said: Even if JD went on this guys podcast and announced he will trade down, it's meaningless until we're in that moment and there's an actual partner wanting to trade up. finding a trade partner isn't as difficult as it's made out to be. Belichick did it almost every year. You just have to be willing to take less than what an imaginary chart says if it makes sense for you. 10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post derp Posted January 23 Popular Post Share Posted January 23 “You don’t need to trade ahead of us to get an offensive tackle because we won’t even be picking at ten.” 3 1 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slimjasi Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 I’d be all about a trade down, but it’s never too early for that SMOKE no one knows anything at this point 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Rhg1084 Posted January 23 Popular Post Share Posted January 23 Cimini has 0 inside knowledge for a report like this. Especially considering we’re still in January! Completely just making up stuff 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet2020 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Not all draft positions have finalized and Semeni thinks Jets are trading down in R1. He seems bored. Also, JD is dumb AF and wouldn’t trade down. He thinks we are one superstar away from being SB contenders. I’d put that number to around 3 just on offense alone and then probably about 10 more starting capable depth player. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Harris Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 JD wanted to trade down last year. Takes 2. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 19 minutes ago, David Harris said: JD wanted to trade down last year. Takes 2. easy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bla bla bla Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 hour ago, Barry McCockinner said: Lol 1st off, love Connor, he calls into my show. He had Mike Tanny on his show too, Cimini never responds to my requests lol 2ndly, I would 100% consider trading down. I'd drop to the early 20s if the haul was good enough. I like a lot of OL, idk if the Jets gamble on that though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 2 hours ago, T0mShane said: May as well. At 10 and with no need for one of the top defensive players, you’re drafting a second round talent anyway. Unless it’s a Georgia TE, I’d agree. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Didn’t we in essence “trade down” just last year as part of the Rodgers trade? I can see us doing something similar this year. Say swap our #10 for the Raider’s #13 (let them come up for Penix or McCarthy in front of MIN and DEN), and trade us Adams. We would also need to toss in a future 2 that could become a 1, and some other mid round pick(s), but we can get a quality starting OL later in the first. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Thornburgh Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 4 hours ago, Beerfish said: If the top two tackles are gone I could see it OR if a QB unexpectedly falls to our spot. Get a qb. Anyone. It’s the only way to guarantee we don’t have to endure watching Zachenberg for a 4th full season we can fix the OL in FA 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetPotato Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 They already traded down for some meaningless wins down the stretch 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 This isn’t a rumor, it’s something he saying to watch out for. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 9 hours ago, David Harris said: JD wanted to trade down last year. Takes 2. Technically he did trade down last year. Pick swap and got Rodgers. Much as this guy might not like it, I consider that a trade down. Even if you don't, it doesn't seem like doing something for four years warrants a "NEVER" in all caps. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPitch Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Once again, ive played the simulators dozens of times each day. No matter what you always do better with a trade down to grab a second. The difference between 10 and say 19 isnt monumental, so it makes sense and we have too many needs what dumb jd needs to do is go on a MAJOR smokescreen display and show lots of interest in QBs. At 10, if teams suspect the jets will grab their qb, they will trade. honestly a qb in round 1 is what he should do anyways but... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoni Beast Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 With the amount of offensive needs we should trade down in the 1st + tag and trade Huff + even look to trade someone like DJ Reed (who I really like but we need to focus on offense). The first 100 picks will have A LOT of OL talent and we could build a beast. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 1 minute ago, HighPitch said: Once again, ive played the simulators dozens of times each day. No matter what you always do better with a trade down to grab a second. The difference between 10 and say 19 isnt monumental, so it makes sense and we have too many needs what dumb jd needs to do is go on a MAJOR smokescreen display and show lots of interest in QBs. At 10, if teams suspect the jets will grab their qb, they will trade. honestly a qb in round 1 is what he should do anyways but... I think there’s going to be trades in place for douglas before the draft, and the condition he will have is that if one of those top 2 LTs is there, he’s taking him at 10 b/c that’s a hard position to fill long term. If both are gone, then he can trade back and get a day 2 pick and still get a good RT. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post PepPep Posted January 23 Popular Post Share Posted January 23 10 hours ago, Warfish said: JD trading down won;t surprise me at all. Will make drafting a bendy Edge at ~#23 who'll need several seasons and huge workouts to get game-ready much more reasonable in his eyes. God. Can we get just a little more originality with the JD bashing please? 7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted January 23 Author Share Posted January 23 7 hours ago, Greenseed4 said: Didn’t we in essence “trade down” just last year as part of the Rodgers trade? I can see us doing something similar this year. Say swap our #10 for the Raider’s #13 (let them come up for Penix or McCarthy in front of MIN and DEN), and trade us Adams. We would also need to toss in a future 2 that could become a 1, and some other mid round pick(s), but we can get a quality starting OL later in the first. Yes, we did trade down last year, good point. We aren't trading for Adams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GangGreened Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 This is so much juicy nothingness 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPitch Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 9 minutes ago, PepPep said: God. Can we get just a little more originality with the JD bashing please? that was actually very funny adn warfish is not that funny of a guy so give him some credit 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slimjasi Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 11 hours ago, Warfish said: JD trading down won;t surprise me at all. Will make drafting a bendy Edge at ~#23 who'll need several seasons and huge workouts to get game-ready much more reasonable in his eyes. Lol this place would spontaneously combust 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepPep Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Probably just smoke at this point, but if it's not, also makes a ton of sense with the Jets presumably missing out on the top 2 OTs. It is easier to pull off a trade where you don't get ripped off before the draft than during the draft. If JD is 80% certain that the top 2 OT's are going to be gone by pick 10 and that is the position he is targeting, makes a ton of sense to move back now, rather than wait and hope a trade materializes on draft day. I know the Jets had McDonald high on their boards. I know they were happy to draft him. But we also saw JD feverishly working the phones to move down (to no avail) when Pitt took OT-B.Jones just ahead of them. I doubt he wants that to happen again. The flip side is that pick #10 is not pick #15. And those 5 spots make a huge difference. At pick #10 it may be more prudent to wait and see how the drat develops. Crazy things always happen in the draft. I would not be surprised at all if we saw unlikely risers that end up going much higher than expected, pushing down other prospects - such as Alt or Fashanu. We all saw a number of reasonable mocks on this forum where Alt or Fashanu falls to #10. A couple of teams just have to value certain prospects a little higher than others. Bottom line. Probably too early to actually make any deal for either team but I would not be surprised if JD was in preliminary talks. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greensleeves Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 Considering this is such a strong draft for OL, this would be a great move. If the top 8 OL will be graded differently by the teams, there is no reason to stay put. I'm sure we'll be able to target more than one that fits our scheme, so a trade back may recoup a 2nd or 3rd rounder, depending on who may have slid in the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section314 Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 11 hours ago, Beerfish said: If the top two tackles are gone I could see it OR if a QB unexpectedly falls to our spot. I could also see a team trading up for an edge or cb if the draft at the top is 3 qb, 2ot, 3 Wr and te. Unlike the Jets, there are teams that have NFL quality offenses.😎 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Straw Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 If Joe Alt, Olumuyiwa Fashanu, and Taliese Fuaga are on the board, Joe D should sprint to the podium and grab one of the three. If all three are gone, the responsible thing to do is to trade down. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.