Jump to content
joewilly12

FREE AGENT NEWS

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, jgb said:

Maybe we should focus on improving enough to exit "laughingstock" territory first

I haven't laughed since the 80s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to go. Day one of free agency "negotiations" -- not signings, and the unrealistic expectations and unjustified panic on this board has reached biblical proportions.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Sonny Werblin said:

I have to go. Day one of free agency "negotiations" -- not signings, and the unrealistic expectations and unjustified panic on this board has reached biblical proportions.

But really who is left out there from the FA pool as it stands right now? A couple of CBs, DL, that's about it. Nothing on offense really with the exception of Jansen and Mac ain't getting that done. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sully80 said:

But really who is left out there from the FA pool as it stands right now? A couple of CBs, DL, that's about it. Nothing on offense really with the exception of Jansen and Mac ain't getting that done. 

same reason chubb will 'fall' to us at 6.  offensive weapons are prioritized, this is the new nfl, you need guys who can score and guys who can get first downs.  they're worth money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, jgb said:

Maybe we should focus on improving enough to exit "laughingstock" territory first

Come on man! Its only year 4 of the rebuild.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Crusher said:

Come on man! Its only year 4 of the rebuild.

Sobering thought... it only took the Egyptians 20 years to build the Great Pyramid

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the money in the league, and we aren't in on any of the top free agents as of yet. Incredible. Players don't want to play for Bowles. This is an absolute farce. I guess this is where the Johnsons extend Bowles again. Unreal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, pointman said:

All the money in the league, and we aren't in on any of the top free agents as of yet. Incredible. Players don't want to play for Bowles. This is an absolute farce. I guess this is where the Johnsons extend Bowles again. Unreal.

giphy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Prior to the start of last season supposedly GMs were laughing at our roster saying how pathetic it was. We are going to head into this season, largely unchanged fielding the same ragtag bunch of youngsters and castaway no name vets but hey we will be a young team. Something needs to change and change fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Matt39 said:

 

I'm glad he's going there. He probably would have been my least favorite QB for us to bring in this offseason.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradford to Arizona, which means the Bills are about to trade right the **** up, baby.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, T0mShane said:

Bradford to Arizona, which means the Bills are about to trade right the **** up, baby.

I pray they lose their marbles and trade for Foles.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, T0mShane said:

Bradford to Arizona, which means the Bills are about to trade right the **** up, baby.

Bills/Giants trade is inevitable.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, pointman said:

But but Cousins sister lives in Arizona. Didn't they get the memo??

Whatever, Bradford is infinitely better than Bridgewater or Mccown. His only downside is injury and that would probably be a good thing for the Jets because it would allow whichever rookie we draft to get a shot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JoJoTownsell1 said:

Whatever, Bradford is infinitely better than Bridgewater or Mccown. His only downside is injury and that would probably be a good thing for the Jets because it would allow whichever rookie we draft to get a shot. 

lol who argued your point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gen X Jet said:

Bills/Giants trade is inevitable.  

It’s the only way this ends. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Gen X Jet said:

Bills/Giants trade is inevitable.  

I just can't believe the giants would be dumb enough to pass on a QB by moving down.  Unless they are really convinced Davis Webb can play and I don't know how they determine that w/ a new staff that hasn't really seen him but I hope they are dumb enough to think Eli has a few years left when he hasn't been good in a long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Gen X Jet said:

Bills/Giants trade is inevitable.  

I don't see it happening. Giants are either trying to win now (so they will go after Barkley/Chubb) or they are looking to build towards the future and will grab one of the QBs. Trading down to 12 makes no sense for a team that is never at the top of the draft. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, just great. At this point, I feel like those monks standing there, legs spread, repeatedly getting kicked in the nuts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bradford to the cards.  Mac don’t rush this...wait and  take last guy available.  

  • Thumb Down 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BigRy56 said:

Great, just great. At this point, I feel like those monks standing there, legs spread, repeatedly getting kicked in the nuts

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, nyjunc said:

I just can't believe the giants would be dumb enough to pass on a QB by moving down.  Unless they are really convinced Davis Webb can play and I don't know how they determine that w/ a new staff that hasn't really seen him but I hope they are dumb enough to think Eli has a few years left when he hasn't been good in a long time.

Giants need a lot more help than a QB.  Gettleman is an old salt who will know better than to let it all ride on an unknown Rookie QB his first year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, JoJoTownsell1 said:

I don't see it happening. Giants are either trying to win now (so they will go after Barkley/Chubb) or they are looking to build towards the future and will grab one of the QBs. Trading down to 12 makes no sense for a team that is never at the top of the draft. 

The Giants can also be in a win-now mode and get multiple first-round picks to shore up one of their many holes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Macc is so freaking reactive How many years in a row do we get the LAST QB standing in the FA carousel? He either doesn't understand market price or doesn't care and just scrapes up whoever is left when the music stops. He'll stand pat at 6 and do the same bloody thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




Content Partnership

Yes Network

Site Sponsor

MILE-Social - NJ Social Media & SEO company
×
×
  • Create New...