Josina Anderson: Jets Potentially Considering Quarterbacks "who are not necessarily known to be available"

[T0mShane]

WENTZZZZZ

[Tranquilo]

2 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

WENTZZZZZ

[Thai Jet]

18 hours ago, HawkeyeJet said:

If I had to make a few guesses they would be Dak, Kyler and Lance.

Good grief. If indeed those were the choices I hope we go 0 for 3. 

[Matt39]

6 hours ago, CSNY said:

Josina said absolutely nothing 

It appears the Jets may be interested in a quarterback. 

[shuler82]

18 minutes ago, Tranquilo said:

This could’ve went so many different ways…

[bla bla bla]

 

 

Here is the article the tweet links to:

 

1. Prediction: The Packers are finished with Aaron Rodgers and will trade him.

The way the 2022 season unraveled for Green Bay affirms that the Packers might have been best off trading Rodgers last offseason instead of entering into a market-setting contract extension with him. That extension does give the team all offseason to find a trading partner before a $58.3 million option bonus is due in Week 1.

“I think the Packers are done with him,” a longtime NFL team executive said on the condition of anonymity for competitive reasons. “The time to jump off was last year. They missed the ability to maximize their compensation. And they missed the playoffs. When they moved Davante (Adams), they should have moved Aaron and said, ‘We are starting over and we have all these picks.’ They could have sent him to Denver.”

The jumping-off point is even more obvious now. Rodgers’ weekly pontifications through The Pat McAfee Show have included suggestions the team should re-sign declining veteran players who are Rodgers’ friends, while questioning whether the Packers will provide the best opportunity for him to win additional MVP awards

“I think he showed his true colors last offseason when he held them hostage and took $50 million a year,” another exec said. “He knew he could get his best deal from the Packers, and now that he has it, now that he has secured the bag, he is open to leaving.”

The Jets have been rumored as a logical landing spot for Rodgers based on their need at the position and the presence of new offensive coordinator Nathaniel Hackett, who coached Rodgers in Green Bay. Execs have pointed to Tennessee as an intriguing potential landing spot. The Packers might not trade Rodgers to an NFC contender such as San Francisco even if the 49ers were interested in absorbing the contractual ramifications.

“Tennessee is a great spot for him,” the first exec said. “I could totally see that,” the second exec said. What about the Jets? “I just don’t know that he is going to want to be in New York,” the first exec said. “Mike Vrabel and Tennessee seem more his pace. Whether Vrabel wants to put up with his s—, who knows? But Matt LaFleur was the offensive coordinator with Vrabel, so Vrabel could pick his brain. Robert Saleh and LaFleur are close. Those teams all have ties.”

The Raiders are also in the market for a quarterback pending Carr’s expected departure from the team.

“Vegas would be fine for him,” the first exec said. “It just seems like a weird fit, Rodgers’ personality and Josh McDaniels. I think Josh would probably rather develop his own guy than have Rodgers, and I think he’d rather have (Jimmy) Garoppolo than Rodgers.”

Quite a few other teams need quarterbacks and could be in the mix, depending on factors that include Rodgers’ interest in those markets. The bottom line is that NFL execs think the Packers are more likely to trade Rodgers than to hold onto him.

“Who are these guys?” a veteran coach countered. “I’d love to be the hypothetical owner in Green Bay listening to the GM and president present the trade case to me so I could reply, ‘OK, in summary, you want to trade an MVP-caliber player who still creates 2-3 wins per season, so we can attempt to solidify our evaluation of our third-year drafted quarterback while he is throwing to sub-average weaponry? It sounds like we are patterning ourselves after our rivals. Which one, Chicago?

[SoFlaJets]

JP Losman Please!

[32EBoozer]

10 minutes ago, bla bla bla said:

Execs have pointed to Tennessee as an intriguing potential landing spot. The Packers might not trade Rodgers to an NFC contender such as San Francisco even if the 49ers were interested in absorbing the contractual ramifications.

“Tennessee is a great spot for him,” the first exec said. “I could totally see that,” the second exec said. What about the Jets? “I just don’t know that he is going to want to be in New York,” the first exec said. “Mike Vrabel and Tennessee seem more his pace. Whether Vrabel wants to put up with his s—, who knows? But Matt LaFleur was the offensive coordinator with Vrabel, so Vrabel could pick his brain. Robert Saleh and LaFleur are close. Those teams all have ties.”

Tennessee: Robert Woods & Treylon Burkes are WR #1 and #2. Yes you have D. Henry but when teams shut him down, the results are ugly. They can trade Tannehil for a 3rd or 4th but give that pick right back to GB.

Jets have OROY Garrett Wilson and Hall and Becton & AVT

[#27TheDominator]

19 hours ago, The Crusher said:

Lance? He’s like a taller more athletic Zach. Haha 

I was a Lance fan coming out.  He is nothing like Zach.  He is a better fullback than Josh Allen!

[The Crusher]

49 minutes ago, #27TheDominator said:

I was a Lance fan coming out.  He is nothing like Zach.  He is a better fullback than Josh Allen!

You have more snaps at QB than he does.,

[BigRy56]

Well then

[Gastineau Lives]

15 minutes ago, BigRy56 said:

Well then

The nine games he was healthy for would be the most fun I’ve had as a fan in ever

I’m in

[FlightBoyz]

If the story is true I'd seriously be on board with acquiring Jared Goff.

[BurnleyJet]

[CSNY]

2 hours ago, Matt39 said:

It appears the Jets may be interested in a quarterback. 

[CSNY]

3 hours ago, T0mShane said:

WENTZZZZZ

Even though he’s terrible he’d be the best QB in the room but if you have to give up anything I’d hold my nose and get Mayfield as he only costs money and no draft picks. Neither options are all that exciting (both options suck) but at least will give us some semblance of a QB 

[RoadFan]

 

??????????

Spanos is notoriously cheap.  He isn’t gonna want to pay $400 million plus.  Nobody goes to watch his team but visiting fans anyway…

[JTJet]

41 minutes ago, BurnleyJet said:

Yep. A disaster on par with his late night show. 

[bla bla bla]

44 minutes ago, Gastineau Lives said:

The nine games he was healthy for would be the most fun I’ve had as a fan in ever

I’m in

I get why people don't want him but man it would make Sundays exciting

[HighPitch]

I can also see dak.

big contract to dump and that rush kid? Is pretty promising

[Adoni Beast]

7 hours ago, T0mShane said:

WENTZZZZZ

[Rhg1084]

4 hours ago, BurnleyJet said:

We’ve been a disaster for about 12 years. We can take a big swing at a QB and try to actually win. And if it doesn’t work out? We’ll still be a disaster anyway, nothing new

[usanyj]

2 minutes ago, Rhg1084 said:

We’ve been a disaster for about 12 years. We can take a big swing at a QB and try to actually win. And if it doesn’t work out? We’ll still be a disaster anyway, nothing new

This has been a wild time reading this forum… as JETS FANS the amount of crap being dished at talented qbs who would elevate this franchise is astounding. 

what about dak?
He’s trash!

How about carr?!

Dead end Derek you mean? Hell no!

Lamar then?

He hasn’t won an mvp in years! No thanks! 

Aaron Rodgers then? 

he’s old and his cap hit!

kyler Murray would be solid right?

are you serious!? He’s a midget!

jared Goff?

the rams dumped him and won a Super Bowl, no thanks.

do we forget that we’ve watched years of Wilson and darnold and mccown and David fales and Tim Tebow and Christian hackenberg and Bryce petty! And people are sh*tting on talented qbs. It’s ridiculous.

[BornJetsFan1983]

On 2/10/2023 at 4:03 PM, T0mShane said:

Tannehill probably. Huge cap number, but Vrabel insists they’re hanging on to him.

We be in playoffs with tanny. Hell we win 12 games last year with him. He feed Garret like AJ brown all day. Tanny is a good qb. Literally essence of a decent to good qb every wr on the te would love him. He can make progression s and throw guys open. I be all about tanny for a year or two

 

 

[Beerfish]

Kyler would be a very viable option to be dealt but i sure would not want him.

Justin Fields could go as well if one of the draft QBs wows the Bears. (This would be a VERY unpopular move by the Bears but imo would be a smart one.)

[Jetsfan80]

8 hours ago, SoFlaJets said:

JP Losman Please!

Only if Lee Evans comes with him.  

[Untouchable]

2 hours ago, Rhg1084 said:

We’ve been a disaster for about 12 years. We can take a big swing at a QB and try to actually win. And if it doesn’t work out? We’ll still be a disaster anyway, nothing new

Seriously 

The same goofs who say adding Rodgers is going to be a disaster are the same slapdicks who want to add Gardner Minshew or retain Mike White and hope against all odds that they turn out to be anything more than career backups, which they clearly are.

This is the most delusional, dickless approach that I can fathom.

Go big or go home.

”Oh no, Rodgers might leave us after a year or two and we’ll be back to square whatever the f*ck we’ve been for the last 12 years”

Jeepers…

[Barry McCockinner]

1 minute ago, Untouchable said:

Seriously 

The same goofs who say adding Rodgers is going to be a disaster are the same slapdicks who want to add Gardner Minshew or retain Mike White and hope against all odds that they turn out to be anything more than career backups.

This is the most delusional, dickless approach that I can fathom.

Go big or go home.

”Oh no, Rodgers might leave us after a year or two and we’ll be back to square whatever the f*ck we’ve been for the last 12 years”

Jeepers…

Of we sign Minshew I'm going to find out where @Jetsfan80lives and fight him

[Maynard13]

4 hours ago, HawkeyeJet said:

Back To The Future

 

 

[#27TheDominator]

On 2/11/2023 at 4:07 PM, The Crusher said:

You have more snaps at QB than he does.,

You can honestly say that about a bunch of guys