Jump to content

You’re the GM - Cut 2 Players


Recommended Posts

The CBA only allows a team to designate two players for a post June 1 cut. This usually offers the biggest savings.

Cimini speculated high profile names being cut for cap flexibility.

With that who are you cutting and why? Replacements, go!

image001.png.e03822b0b54086fa8ae4d628566117c2.png

Numbers from overthecap.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No reason not to cut all 4.  The only one that even gives me pause is Tomlinson because we don't actually have much behind him.  Assuming we address OG between FA and the draft, he can go.  JFM is productive, but if we could keep Huff by cutting him, I will run with the scissors up to JD's desk.  The other two can go.  They were invisible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, slimjasi said:

Of those players?

Definitely Tomlinson and Uzomah 

not particularly close, IMO

JFM and mosely are overpaid but they each make the occasional play 

Laken and cj are checked out complete waste of roster spots 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, HawkeyeJet said:

JFM and Uzomah.

Uzomah is a no brainer for me.  I think JFM is a better player than Tomlinson by a good margin, but he’s not worth what we are paying and have several players in his mold that I think could fill in adequately. 

Tomlinson, who has not been great, is at least available, which needs to be considered with our OL history.
 

 

You stole my answer.  Like you say, Uzomah is a no brainer.  As much as I am looking forward to the end of Tomlinson's contract, we need OL.  We are better positioned to deal with the loss of JFM along the defensive front 7 than Tomlinson on the OL.

  • Upvote 1
  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NYJCAP2 said:

The CBA only allows a team to designate two players for a post June 1 cut. This usually offers the biggest savings.

Cimini speculated high profile names being cut for cap flexibility.

With that who are you cutting and why? Replacements, go!

image001.png.e03822b0b54086fa8ae4d628566117c2.png

Numbers from overthecap.

 

Tomlinson & Uzoma

Promote Dr. Schweitzer &...

KUNTZ !!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HawkeyeJet said:

JFM and Uzomah.

Uzomah is a no brainer for me.  I think JFM is a better player than Tomlinson by a good margin, but he’s not worth what we are paying and have several players in his mold that I think could fill in adequately. 

Tomlinson, who has not been great, is at least available, which needs to be considered with our OL history.
 

 

Tomlinson is part of the problem with the offensive line.  He might be available, but so what?  If he is one of the contributors to the poor offensive line, than cutting him to save over $13M dollars is an absolute no-brainer to me.  

While I would cut Uzomah, putting him down as one of the 2 post June 1st cuts doesn't save us a hell of a lot of money.

Mosely, while I love the guy and respect him, saves us $17M bucks.  He is on the down swing of his career in my opinion.  Either he takes a cut in pay, or I cut him and Tomlinson, saving us a whooping $30,000,000.00 dollars!!!!

Cutting Uzomah after June 1st only saves the Jets an additional  $2M I believe.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barry McCockinner said:

tomlinson & uzomah for me. I'm not the biggest Mosely fan but at least he's useful and a respected leader. I'm taking at least one G/C in the draft. Uzomah doesn't need to be replaced he should have been demoted before the injury but our CS is clueless with offensive personnel decisions.

they say the best ability is availability but it can't be your only ability - looking at you tomlinson.

This.

Mosley is polarizing and obviously very overpaid but he’s a leader and the coaches love him. JFM is overpaid but a good part of the DL rotation.

Romlinson and Uzomah stink and shouldn’t be starting for us.

  • Upvote 1
  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the first 3 guys you try to reestructure or tell'em to take a paycut, uzomah is the most cutable player in recent jet history.

Cutting CJ Mosley would make a huge hole that we don't really have the money or picks to fill, I hate Laken but he's the only OL that can stay healthy as for JFM he's easily replaceable for a veteran that would make 1/4 of what we're paying him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Alka said:

Tomlinson is part of the problem with the offensive line.  He might be available, but so what?  If he is one of the contributors to the poor offensive line, than cutting him to save over $13M dollars is an absolute no-brainer to me.  

While I would cut Uzomah, putting him down as one of the 2 post June 1st cuts doesn't save us a hell of a lot of money.

Mosely, while I love the guy and respect him, saves us $17M bucks.  He is on the down swing of his career in my opinion.  Either he takes a cut in pay, or I cut him and Tomlinson, saving us a whooping $30,000,000.00 dollars!!!!

Cutting Uzomah after June 1st only saves the Jets an additional  $2M I believe.  

While I don’t share the sentiment on Mosely, this is exactly why I posted the question. 
 

Exactly.. do you just cut Uzomah before June 1 and save more with another bloated salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NYJCAP2 said:

The CBA only allows a team to designate two players for a post June 1 cut. This usually offers the biggest savings.

Cimini speculated high profile names being cut for cap flexibility.

With that who are you cutting and why? Replacements, go!

image001.png.e03822b0b54086fa8ae4d628566117c2.png

Numbers from overthecap.

 

I don't obsess over dead cap on the current vs next year's cap, since it's the same amount & you can just move others' hits around instead with the same net result, but since you asked, this one is easy:

  1. Post-6/1 = Mosley + Tomlinson. Clears $30MM between them.
  2. Pre-6/1 = Uzomah. Clears his preposterous $8MM salary
  3. Restructure JFM, ideally with a pay cut in exchange for guarantee, which he shouldn't balk at like CJM did over this past summer. Just time it right, where you don't wait until there's no one else on the roster to fill his role, so he calls our bluff. No one else is paying Franklin-Myers $14MM for the season after a 3.5-sack season where he gets 1 solo and 1 assisted tackle per game, and he probably knows it (or anyway, his agent would). He's not Richard Seymour, but he's a good player and after a pay cut the premium isn't that bad over his veteran replacement, as the team seeks to sift McDonald in more without being outright forced to do so, ready or not.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alka said:

Tomlinson is part of the problem with the offensive line.  He might be available, but so what?  If he is one of the contributors to the poor offensive line, than cutting him to save over $13M dollars is an absolute no-brainer to me.  

While I would cut Uzomah, putting him down as one of the 2 post June 1st cuts doesn't save us a hell of a lot of money.

Mosely, while I love the guy and respect him, saves us $17M bucks.  He is on the down swing of his career in my opinion.  Either he takes a cut in pay, or I cut him and Tomlinson, saving us a whooping $30,000,000.00 dollars!!!!

Cutting Uzomah after June 1st only saves the Jets an additional  $2M I believe.  

To each their own.  Tomlinson would start for more teams than just the Jets.  Maybe not a lot, but he’s a fringe starter.  Most teams have a performer like Tomlinson on their OL.

You can be a good offensive line with Tomlinson, but he’s gotta be your 5th best.

I won't go nuts if they cut him, but if they do that leaves 3 empty spots on the starting OL depth chart to fill this off-season.  That’s presuming they are penciling in Tippmann, which I think they will.

Adding 3 starting caliber players in one offseason is a lot easier said than done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HawkeyeJet said:

JFM and Uzomah.

Uzomah is a no brainer for me.  I think JFM is a better player than Tomlinson by a good margin, but he’s not worth what we are paying and have several players in his mold that I think could fill in adequately. 

Tomlinson, who has not been great, is at least available, which needs to be considered with our OL history.
 

 

No way Tomlinson is here.  Sure he plays….unfortunately not well or average 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...