Jump to content

NY Jets Forum

Talk about Robert Saleh, Joe Douglas & the NFL in our NY Jets message board.


114,384 topics in this forum

  1. Playoff chances for Jets

    • 21 replies
    • 749 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1,692 views
    • 17 replies
    • 891 views
    • 20 replies
    • 839 views
    • 10 replies
    • 555 views
    • 5 replies
    • 290 views
  2. Strength of Schedule

    • 5 replies
    • 284 views
    • 11 replies
    • 633 views
    • 9 replies
    • 496 views
    • 9 replies
    • 366 views
    • 54 replies
    • 2,073 views
    • 8 replies
    • 534 views
    • 12 replies
    • 732 views
  3. Mangini and the Jets getting their Props

    • 1 reply
    • 205 views
    • 19 replies
    • 667 views
  4. My Super Bowl guarentee...

    • 16 replies
    • 673 views
    • 11 replies
    • 520 views
  5. Thank You Herman Edwards!!

    • 13 replies
    • 691 views
    • 9 replies
    • 506 views
  6. What if Martin?

    • 16 replies
    • 532 views
    • 25 replies
    • 842 views
    • 23 replies
    • 973 views
    • 18 replies
    • 554 views
    • 10 replies
    • 426 views
  7. Jet in Bear Country

    • 3 replies
    • 356 views
    • 30 replies
    • 906 views
    • 4 replies
    • 282 views
    • 5 replies
    • 308 views
    • 0 replies
    • 187 views
    • 8 replies
    • 282 views
  8. Sorry Chad Haters 1 2 3 4 6

    • 197 replies
    • 5,826 views
    • 10 replies
    • 669 views
  9. Tuesday Morning QB

    • 7 replies
    • 515 views
  10. Flex Schedule - 11/26

    • 17 replies
    • 780 views
    • 3 replies
    • 341 views
  • Posts

    • No, because the coach thought that the backup had earned the opportunity to challenge Zach, and he thought it would be good for Zach. It was not a negative on Zach's playing ability.
    • Your employer has no legal obligation to 'do anything' about your criminal behavior if it is on your own time and not part of the work you do for them.  Nobody is defending Echols' behavior, but you are completely misguided if you think the Jets have any more responsibility for this than Burger King would if one of their cashiers did it on their own time.  You are conflating deep pockets with increased responsibility, which is the hallowed ground of every ambulance chaser out there but, as other have said, just isn't a thing.   I don't recall hearing of the Raiders being liable for Ruggs....or the Patriots for Hernandez...and so on.  By your 'logic', the Dolphins would be responsible for child-support for Tyreek Hill's babies.  Everyone but you and the victim's attorney can see how much nonsense this is.  If it weren't the legal system would blow up with lawsuits overnight. If you want to blame the Jets for football things, go right ahead.  But this sounds like something you are trying to wish into existence.
    • You mean because he had not proven himself worthy? 
  • Available Subscriptions

×
×
  • Create New...