T0mShane Posted February 19, 2021 Author Share Posted February 19, 2021 3 minutes ago, Seibelt said: am starting to come around to your way of thinking. You sorry son of a bitch! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 32 minutes ago, Spoot-Face said: Tom Shanes better half 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
undertow Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 If you are on the side of Woody Johnson on how to rebuild a team you should re-evaluate your position....giving anything more then the number two pick and two more 1sts is completely moronic. Let JD do his job and make the decisions if Woody is getting involved we are completely fVcked. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seibelt Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 5 minutes ago, T0mShane said: You sorry son of a bitch! You have to admit that is WAY too high and as Jetstream23 mentioned, our starting point?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 10 minutes ago, jetstream23 said: If this does turn out to be true then a few thoughts: 1) None of the 1sts better be the #2. 2) The player better not be QW, Becton or Mims. 3) The 1sts in future years better be "protected" from being Top 5 picks. 1) About the only thing the Jets hold as leverage over every other team who would want Watson is the #2 pick. It will, 100%, be included in any trade compensation package we send to them. The Texans will want it to start over and pick their 2nd favorite QB in the draft. 2) I guarantee you, it will not be either Becton or Mims. QW, maybe, but even I think that QW plus the 2OA, plus 3 more 1sts is a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derp Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 53 minutes ago, Guilhermezmc said: SOURCES “I resign as GM of NYJ.” Seriously, I suppose they could do something with four first round picks that doesn’t include 2 overall but otherwise it’s bananas. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 The tweet is probably false, but even as much as I want Watson, I'm not unconcerned about the notion of Woody meddling this much into football affairs and JD kowtowing to the pressure. Kinda reeks. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post jetstream23 Posted February 19, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted February 19, 2021 2 minutes ago, Spoot-Face said: 1) About the only thing the Jets hold as leverage over every other team who would want Watson is the #2 pick. It will, 100%, be included in any trade compensation package we send to them. The Texans will want it to start over and pick their 2nd favorite QB in the draft. 2) I guarantee you, it will not be either Becton or Mims. QW, maybe, but even I think that QW plus the 2OA, plus 3 more 1sts is a lot. If it include FOUR 1st round picks one of them can't be the #2 IMO. If they want the #2 pick then we have to back them off to two or maybe three 1sts. And maybe I'm in the minority but I see QW being one of the best defenders in the AFC by the end of next year. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoot-Face Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 3 minutes ago, jetstream23 said: If it include FOUR 1st round picks one of them can't be the #2 IMO. If they want the #2 pick then we have to back them off to two or maybe three 1sts. And maybe I'm in the minority but I see QW being one of the best defenders in the AFC by the end of next year. There's just no way that we land Deshaun Watson and not give up the #2. No way. Although, 4 first round picks is nearing my maximum. A year ago I wouldn't have blinked at giving QW up in a package to land Deshaun Watson. Now, though? I admit it's a bit harder. Now, 2 firsts, 2 thirds, and QW for Deshaun Watson? I make that deal and not look back. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 22 minutes ago, 32EBoozer said: Tom Shanes better half I thought he was dating @kelly 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetstream23 Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Guilhermezmc said: SOURCES Incarcerated Wesley has now replaced Incarcerated Bob. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
32EBoozer Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 15 minutes ago, jetstream23 said: If it include FOUR 1st round picks one of them can't be the #2 IMO. If they want the #2 pick then we have to back them off to two or maybe three 1sts. And maybe I'm in the minority but I see QW being one of the best defenders in the AFC by the end of next year. Would you consider #2, #34 and Next year's to #1 picks and call it a deal. Can Jet fans live with that? If QW is included then only one #1 next year. I think Saleh and DC can work around Q being gone with some of our depth. Gaining Watson, however, gets us to 6-10 as soon as he signs the contract! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcJet Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 3 hours ago, Mike135 said: Crap, it's all our fault for not going to more games. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted February 19, 2021 Author Share Posted February 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Seibelt said: You have to admit that is WAY too high and as Jetstream23 mentioned, our starting point?? I just meant agreeing with @Beerfish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 40 minutes ago, 32EBoozer said: Would you consider #2, #34 and Next year's to #1 picks and call it a deal. Can Jet fans live with that? If QW is included then only one #1 next year. I think Saleh and DC can work around Q being gone with some of our depth. Gaining Watson, however, gets us to 6-10 as soon as he signs the contract! #2 this year our #1 next year and CJ Mosley We keep the Seattle picks. Giving all of it up is a lot but the way we draft comes into play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 2 hours ago, 32EBoozer said: Would you consider #2, #34 and Next year's to #1 picks and call it a deal. Can Jet fans live with that? If QW is included then only one #1 next year. I think Saleh and DC can work around Q being gone with some of our depth. Gaining Watson, however, gets us to 6-10 as soon as he signs the contract! #2 this year to me has a value of 3 1st rounders at least. The two 1st rounders next year could EASILY be both top 10 Just how does watson go 6-10 immediately when he won 4 games last year. Giving up mega resources is just stupid for the shiny toy that in the end will not make you a super bowl contender imo. We FINALLY have the resources to take a talent poor team and over a two year period up the talent level all over the place really well and we are going to toss it for a QB who alone does not make you win. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRy56 Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 This is all just foreplay we all know Watson is a Jet 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetswinbaby! Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Mike135 said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedBeardedSavage Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 Woody Johnson is Kendall Roy and he's about to overpay for Vaulter. Someone in this organization needs to talk him down. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage69 Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 1 hour ago, 32EBoozer said: Would you consider #2, #34 and Next year's to #1 picks and call it a deal. Can Jet fans live with that? If QW is included then only one #1 next year. I think Saleh and DC can work around Q being gone with some of our depth. Gaining Watson, however, gets us to 6-10 as soon as he signs the contract! We went 7-9 without him in 2019. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebag Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 The big kicker here is that Watson controls where he goes. If there's a hold up over draft picks, Deshaun can put pressure on both sides.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 I would trade QW if they took a first rounder out of the package otherwise it’s too much 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawkeyeJet Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 Are we really believing that ticket sales might be a factor in this decision? Hell, if Covid is under control this fall I might ****ing buy season tickets and walk my ass to New Jersey 8 times if I have to. Ticket sales should be the last of any owners worries coming off the pandemic. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage69 Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 1 minute ago, Patriot Killa said: I would trade QW if they took a first rounder out of the package otherwise it’s too much You don't even know if Houston is going to trade him or what they want if they do.. Bottom line like it or not he signed a contract and if he don't play he don't get paid.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 Heyyy, remember when Carson Wentz was going for two 1st round picks and a player. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UntouchableCrew Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 That dude has 38 followers. Unconcerned. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 26 minutes ago, Beerfish said: #2 this year to me has a value of 3 1st rounders at least. The two 1st rounders next year could EASILY be both top 10 Just how dos watson go 6-10 immediately when he won 4 games last year. Giving up mega resources is just stupid for the shiny toy that in the end will not make you a super bowl contender imo. We FINALLY have the resources to take a talent poor team and over a two year period up the talent level all over the place really well and we are going to toss it for a QB who alone does not make you win. I agree We need a franchise QB but we shouldn't trade the entire franchise for one. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redlichtie Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Beerfish said: I will be enraged if the Jets do this, totally enraged. You’ll have plenty of company 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted February 19, 2021 Author Share Posted February 19, 2021 It’ll be #2, #23, 2022 first, 2022 third. Then you trade Darnold for a 2 this year and walk away greezy 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 8 minutes ago, T0mShane said: It’ll be #2, #23, 2022 first, 2022 third. Then you trade Darnold for a 2 this year and walk away greezy Looks good on paper. 3 #1s OUCH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetPotato Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 14 minutes ago, T0mShane said: It’ll be #2, #23, 2022 first, 2022 third. Then you trade Darnold for a 2 this year and walk away greezy Think of it as #2 and Jamal Adams You make that trade 11 times out of 10. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sourceworx Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 2 minutes ago, JetPotato said: Think of it as #2 and Jamal Adams You make that trade 11 times out of 10. Exactly. This is the price you pay for taking a box safety over this kid in 2017. Mistakes like that are costly. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TokyoJetsFan Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 I call bullsht. The Johnsons would not do anything to piss Joe Douglas off. I really dont see Woody forcing Joe Douglas to make a trade at all costs. If that happened Douglas would quit rather than screw up his long term plans. I don't like Woody, but this is just stupid. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Blitz Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 3 hours ago, Guilhermezmc said: SOURCES Dear lord I hope this is BS. Not sure what’s worse, giving up that capital or the suggestion of that idiot interfering with JDs running of the team. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derp Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 20 minutes ago, JetPotato said: Think of it as #2 and Jamal Adams You make that trade 11 times out of 10. Probably a little more than 11 times out of 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.