Jump to content

DESHAUN OFFICIALLY REQUESTS TRADE BABY


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Just for me personally, I think we should build up the OL and give Sweet Sammy another shot, we can always trade for a 25-year-old top-5 QB a year from now. JMO

MAKE EET HAPPEN JOE DOUGLAS AND STUFF @Matt39 INTO A LOCKER

Posted Images

If you are on the side of Woody Johnson on how to rebuild a team you should re-evaluate your position....giving anything more then the number two pick and two more 1sts is completely moronic.  Let JD do his job and make the decisions if Woody is getting involved we are completely fVcked. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, jetstream23 said:

If this does turn out to be true then a few thoughts:  1) None of the 1sts better be the #2.  2) The player better not be QW, Becton or Mims.  3) The 1sts in future years better be "protected" from being Top 5 picks.

1) About the only thing the Jets hold as leverage over every other team who would want Watson is the #2 pick. It will, 100%, be included in any trade compensation package we send to them. The Texans will want it to start over and pick their 2nd favorite QB in the draft.

2) I guarantee you, it will not be either Becton or Mims. QW, maybe, but even I think that QW plus the 2OA, plus 3 more 1sts is a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Guilhermezmc said:

SOURCES

“I resign as GM of NYJ.”

Seriously, I suppose they could do something with four first round picks that doesn’t include 2 overall but otherwise it’s bananas.

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The tweet is probably false, but even as much as I want Watson, I'm not unconcerned about the notion of Woody meddling this much into football affairs and JD kowtowing to the pressure. Kinda reeks.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jetstream23 said:

If it include FOUR 1st round picks one of them can't be the #2 IMO.  If they want the #2 pick then we have to back them off to two or maybe three 1sts.  And maybe I'm in the minority but I see QW being one of the best defenders in the AFC by the end of next year.

There's just no way that we land Deshaun Watson and not give up the #2. No way. Although, 4 first round picks is nearing my maximum.

A year ago I wouldn't have blinked at giving QW up in a package to land Deshaun Watson. Now, though? I admit it's a bit harder.

Now, 2 firsts, 2 thirds, and QW for Deshaun Watson? I make that deal and not look back.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thumb Down 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, jetstream23 said:

If it include FOUR 1st round picks one of them can't be the #2 IMO.  If they want the #2 pick then we have to back them off to two or maybe three 1sts.  And maybe I'm in the minority but I see QW being one of the best defenders in the AFC by the end of next year.

Would you consider #2, #34 and Next year's to #1 picks and call it a deal. Can Jet fans live with that?

If QW is included then only one #1 next year. I think Saleh and DC can work around Q being gone with some of our depth.

Gaining Watson, however, gets us to 6-10 as soon as he signs the contract!

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, 32EBoozer said:

Would you consider #2, #34 and Next year's to #1 picks and call it a deal. Can Jet fans live with that?

If QW is included then only one #1 next year. I think Saleh and DC can work around Q being gone with some of our depth.

Gaining Watson, however, gets us to 6-10 as soon as he signs the contract!

#2 this year our #1 next year and CJ Mosley  

We keep the Seattle picks. 

Giving all of it up is a lot but the way we draft comes into play. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 32EBoozer said:

Would you consider #2, #34 and Next year's to #1 picks and call it a deal. Can Jet fans live with that?

If QW is included then only one #1 next year. I think Saleh and DC can work around Q being gone with some of our depth.

Gaining Watson, however, gets us to 6-10 as soon as he signs the contract!

#2 this year to me has a value of 3 1st rounders at least.

The two 1st rounders next year could EASILY be both top 10

Just how does watson go  6-10 immediately when he won 4 games last year.

Giving up mega resources is just stupid for the shiny toy that in the end will not make you a super bowl contender imo.

We FINALLY have the resources to take a talent poor team and over a two year period up the talent level all over the place really well and we are going to toss it for a QB who alone does not make you win.

  • Upvote 1
  • Post of the Week 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 32EBoozer said:

Would you consider #2, #34 and Next year's to #1 picks and call it a deal. Can Jet fans live with that?

If QW is included then only one #1 next year. I think Saleh and DC can work around Q being gone with some of our depth.

Gaining Watson, however, gets us to 6-10 as soon as he signs the contract!

We went 7-9 without him in 2019.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we really believing that ticket sales might be a factor in this decision?  Hell, if Covid is under control this fall I might ****ing buy season tickets and walk my ass to New Jersey 8 times if I have to.

Ticket sales should be the last of any owners worries coming off the pandemic.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Patriot Killa said:

I would trade QW if they took a first rounder out of the package otherwise it’s too much 

You don't even know if Houston is going to trade him or what they want if they do.. Bottom line like it or not he signed a contract and if he don't play he don't get paid..

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Beerfish said:

#2 this year to me has a value of 3 1st rounders at least.

The two 1st rounders next year could EASILY be both top 10

Just how dos watson go  6-10 immediately when he won 4 games last year.

Giving up mega resources is just stupid for the shiny toy that in the end will not make you a super bowl contender imo.

We FINALLY have the resources to take a talent poor team and over a two year period up the talent level all over the place really well and we are going to toss it for a QB who alone does not make you win.

I agree 

We need a franchise QB but we shouldn't trade the entire franchise for one. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, T0mShane said:

It’ll be #2, #23, 2022 first, 2022 third. Then you trade Darnold for a 2 this year and walk away greezy

Think of it as #2 and Jamal Adams

You make that trade 11 times out of 10.

  • Upvote 3
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, JetPotato said:

Think of it as #2 and Jamal Adams

You make that trade 11 times out of 10.

Exactly. This is the price you pay for taking a box safety over this kid in 2017. Mistakes like that are costly.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I call bullsht.  The Johnsons would not do anything to piss Joe Douglas off.  I really dont see Woody forcing Joe Douglas to make a trade at all costs.  If that happened Douglas would quit rather than screw up his long term plans. I don't like Woody, but this is just stupid.

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...